本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

google-cloud-waf-performance-optimization

Generates performance-focused guidance for Google Cloud workloads based on the design principles and recommendations in the Performance Optimization pillar of the Google Cloud Well-Architected Framework (WAF). Use this skill to evaluate a workload, identify performance requirements, and provide actionable recommendations for resource allocation, modular design, and elasticity.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md7.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Google Cloud Well-Architected Framework skill for the Performance Optimization pillar

Overview

The Performance Optimization pillar of the Google Cloud Well-Architected Framework provides principles and recommendations to help you design, build, and operate high-performing workloads. It focuses on efficiently allocating resources, leveraging modular architectures, and using data-driven insights to continuously monitor and improve performance as your business needs evolve.

Core principles

The recommendations in the performance optimization pillar of the Well-Architected Framework are aligned with the following core principles:

Relevant Google Cloud products

The following are examples of Google Cloud products and features that are relevant to performance optimization:

  • Compute and scaling

    • Compute Engine (MIGs): Managed instance groups that support autoscaling and load balancing for VM-based workloads.
    • Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE): Provides container orchestration with horizontal and vertical pod autoscaling.
    • Cloud Run: A fully managed serverless platform that automatically scales containers to zero or up based on traffic.
  • Data and caching

    • Cloud CDN: Low-latency content delivery network to cache static and dynamic content closer to end-users.
    • Memorystore: Managed in-memory data store for Valkey and Redis to provide sub-millisecond data access.
    • Bigtable: NoSQL database service for analytical and operational workloads requiring low latency and high throughput.
    • Spanner: RDBMS that provides global consistency, high availability, and horizontal scaling for mission-critical transactional applications.
  • Performance analysis and monitoring

    • Cloud Trace: Distributed tracing system that helps identify latency bottlenecks.
    • Cloud Profiler: Continuous CPU and memory profiling to identify resource-heavy application code.
    • Cloud Monitoring: Provides dashboards and alerts based on performance KPIs like latency and throughput.

Workload assessment questions

Ask appropriate questions to understand the performance-related requirements and constraints of the workload and the user's organization. Choose questions from the following list:

  • Plan resource allocation

    • When initially provisioning compute resources for a new application, which approach do you use to determine the required capacity for expected peak loads?
    • Which caching strategies (browser, in-memory, CDN, database) do you utilize to improve performance and responsiveness?
    • How do you optimize the performance of your data storage solutions (e.g., SSD vs HDD, storage classes) for your applications?
  • Promote modular design

    • Which architectural patterns (microservices, asynchronous messaging, stateless servers) do you employ to enhance performance and resilience?
    • How do you design your application to minimize the impact of failures in one part of the system on other parts?
  • Continuously monitor and improve performance

    • How frequently do you review and analyze the performance of your production applications and infrastructure?
    • Which tools or techniques (APM, distributed tracing, load testing) do you use to proactively identify and diagnose performance bottlenecks?
    • How do you incorporate performance considerations into your software development lifecycle (SDLC)?
  • Take advantage of elasticity

    • Which methods do you use to manage and optimize the cost of your cloud resources while maintaining performance?
    • How do you typically handle sudden spikes in traffic or workload on your applications?

Validation checklist

Use the following checklist to evaluate the architecture's alignment with performance optimization recommendations:

  • Resource allocation

    • Initial provisioning is based on load testing or historical data rather than general estimates.
    • Caching is implemented at multiple layers (CDN, in-memory, or browser) to offload backend systems.
    • Storage types (SSD/HDD) and classes are selected based on the specific I/O requirements of the workload.
  • Modular design

    • The architecture uses microservices or decoupled components to allow independent scaling.
    • Circuit breakers or bulkheads are implemented to isolate failures and prevent performance degradation across the system.
  • Monitoring and continuous improvement

    • Automated dashboards and alerts are configured for key performance indicators (KPIs).
    • Distributed tracing and profiling tools are used to identify code-level bottlenecks.
    • Performance testing (unit and integration) is integrated into the software development lifecycle.
  • Elasticity

    • Auto-scaling rules are configured and validated to handle variable demand.
    • The architecture leverages serverless or managed services to dynamically match capacity to load.
    • Resource utilization is reviewed regularly to eliminate idle overhead and balance cost with performance.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

Regression check — diff a live page's web accessibility (a11y) violations against a baseline. By default it compares your uncommitted changes (stash-based); pass `--branch [<name>]` to compare against a branch. Reports the new WCAG violations introduced, the ones fixed, and the count of pre-existing ones. Use it for 'did my change break accessibility', 'what a11y issues did this PR add', or as a CI gate. For a full scan of one page use `accessibility-scan`; for a whole site use `accessibility-audit`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

tensology のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する