Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
EMR/EHR development patterns for healthcare applications. Clinical safety, encounter workflows, prescription generation, clinical decision support integration, and accessibility-first UI for medical data entry.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Patterns for building Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems. Prioritizes patient safety, clinical accuracy, and practitioner efficiency.
Every design decision must be evaluated against: "Could this harm a patient?"
Clinical encounters should flow vertically on a single page — no tab switching:
Patient Header (sticky — always visible)
├── Demographics, allergies, active medications
│
Encounter Flow (vertical scroll)
├── 1. Chief Complaint (structured templates + free text)
├── 2. History of Present Illness
├── 3. Physical Examination (system-wise)
├── 4. Vitals (auto-trigger clinical scoring)
├── 5. Diagnosis (ICD-10/SNOMED search)
├── 6. Medications (drug DB + interaction check)
├── 7. Investigations (lab/radiology orders)
├── 8. Plan & Follow-up
└── 9. Sign / Lock / Print
interface ClinicalTemplate {
id: string;
name: string; // e.g., "Chest Pain"
chips: string[]; // clickable symptom chips
requiredFields: string[]; // mandatory data points
redFlags: string[]; // triggers non-dismissable alert
icdSuggestions: string[]; // pre-mapped diagnosis codes
}
Red flags in any template must trigger a visible, non-dismissable alert — NOT a toast notification.
User selects drug
→ Check current medications for interactions
→ Check encounter medications for interactions
→ Check patient allergies
→ Validate dose against weight/age/renal function
→ If CRITICAL interaction: BLOCK prescribing entirely
→ Clinician must document override reason to proceed past a block
→ If MAJOR interaction: display warning, require acknowledgment
→ Log all alerts and override reasons in audit trail
Critical interactions block prescribing by default. The clinician must explicitly override with a documented reason stored in the audit trail. The system never silently allows a critical interaction.
Once a clinical encounter is signed:
Vitals Display: Current values with normal range highlighting (green/yellow/red), trend arrows vs previous, clinical scoring auto-calculated (NEWS2, qSOFA), escalation guidance inline.
Lab Results Display: Normal range highlighting, previous value comparison, critical values with non-dismissable alert, collection/analysis timestamps, pending orders with expected turnaround.
Prescription PDF: One-click generation with patient demographics, allergies, diagnosis, drug details (generic + brand, dose, route, frequency, duration), clinician signature block.
Healthcare UIs have stricter requirements than typical web apps:
any type for clinical data structuresDoctor opens encounter for Patient #4521
→ Sticky header shows: "Rajesh M, 58M, Allergies: Penicillin, Active Meds: Metformin 500mg"
→ Chief Complaint: selects "Chest Pain" template
→ Clicks chips: "substernal", "radiating to left arm", "crushing"
→ Red flag "crushing substernal chest pain" triggers non-dismissable alert
→ Examination: CVS system — "S1 S2 normal, no murmur"
→ Vitals: HR 110, BP 90/60, SpO2 94%
→ NEWS2 auto-calculates: score 8, risk HIGH, escalation alert shown
→ Diagnosis: searches "ACS" → selects ICD-10 I21.9
→ Medications: selects Aspirin 300mg
→ CDSS checks against Metformin: no interaction
→ Signs encounter → locked, addendum-only from this point
Doctor prescribes Warfarin for Patient #4521
→ CDSS detects: Warfarin + Aspirin = CRITICAL interaction
→ UI: red non-dismissable modal blocks prescribing
→ Doctor clicks "Override with reason"
→ Types: "Benefits outweigh risks — monitored INR protocol"
→ Override reason + alert stored in audit trail
→ Prescription proceeds with documented override
Encounter #E-2024-0891 signed by Dr. Shah at 14:30
→ All fields locked — no edit buttons visible
→ "Add Addendum" button available
→ Dr. Shah clicks addendum, adds: "Lab results received — Troponin elevated"
→ New record E-2024-0891-A1 linked to original
→ Timeline shows both: original encounter + addendum with timestamps
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Regression check — diff a live page's web accessibility (a11y) violations against a baseline. By default it compares your uncommitted changes (stash-based); pass `--branch [<name>]` to compare against a branch. Reports the new WCAG violations introduced, the ones fixed, and the count of pre-existing ones. Use it for 'did my change break accessibility', 'what a11y issues did this PR add', or as a CI gate. For a full scan of one page use `accessibility-scan`; for a whole site use `accessibility-audit`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。