Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates test documentation (testing-strategy.md + tests/README.md). Establishes testing philosophy and Story-Level Test Task Pattern.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Paths: File paths (
shared/,references/,../ln-*) are relative to skills repo root. If not found at CWD, locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root.
This skill creates and validates test documentation: testing-strategy.md (universal testing philosophy) + tests/README.md (test organization structure and Story-Level Test Task Pattern).
Creates and validates test documentation (testing-strategy.md + tests/README.md) establishing universal testing philosophy, Risk-Based Testing strategy, and Story-Level Test Task Pattern for any project.
This skill is a L2 WORKER invoked by ln-100-documents-pipeline orchestrator.
This skill should be used directly when:
The skill follows a 3-phase workflow: CREATE → VALIDATE STRUCTURE → VALIDATE CONTENT. Each phase builds on the previous, ensuring complete structure and semantic validation.
Objective: Establish test philosophy and documentation structure.
Process:
1.1 Check & create directories:
docs/reference/guides/ exists → create if missingtests/ exists → create if missingtests/manual/ exists → create if missingtests/manual/results/ exists → create if missingtests/manual/results/ to project .gitignore if not present1.2 Check & create documentation files:
Check if docs/reference/guides/testing-strategy.md exists
If exists:
If NOT exists:
ln-114-test-docs-creator/references/testing_strategy_template.md → docs/reference/guides/testing-strategy.md[CURRENT_DATE] — current date (YYYY-MM-DD)Check if tests/README.md exists
If exists:
If NOT exists:
ln-114-test-docs-creator/references/tests_readme_template.md → tests/README.md{{DATE}} — current date (YYYY-MM-DD)1.3 Output:
docs/reference/guides/
└── testing-strategy.md # Created or existing
tests/
├── README.md # Created or existing
└── manual/
└── results/ # Created, added to .gitignore
Objective: Ensure test documentation files comply with structural requirements and auto-fix violations.
Process:
2.1 Check SCOPE tags:
<!-- SCOPE: ... --> tag in each<!-- SCOPE: Universal testing philosophy (Risk-Based Testing, test pyramid, isolation patterns) --><!-- SCOPE: Test organization structure (directory layout, Story-Level Test Task Pattern) -->scope_tags_added += 12.2 Check required sections:
references/questions.md## [Section Name] header existsmissing_sections += 12.3 Check Maintenance section:
## Maintenance header## Maintenance
**Last Updated:** [current date]
**Update Triggers:**
- Test framework changes
- Test organization changes
- New test patterns introduced
**Verification:**
- [ ] All test examples follow current framework syntax
- [ ] Directory structure matches actual tests/
- [ ] Test runner commands are current
maintenance_added += 12.4 Check POSIX file endings:
posix_fixed += 12.5 Report validation:
✅ Structure validation complete:
- SCOPE tags: [added N / already present]
- Missing sections: [added N sections]
- Maintenance sections: [added N / already present]
- POSIX endings: [fixed N / compliant]
Objective: Ensure each section answers its questions with meaningful content and populate test-specific sections from auto-discovery.
Process:
3.1 Load validation spec:
references/questions.md3.2 Validate testing-strategy.md sections:
For this file, use standard template content (no auto-discovery needed):
Testing Philosophy section:
Test Levels section:
Note: testing-strategy.md is universal philosophy - no project-specific auto-discovery needed.
3.3 Validate tests/README.md sections with auto-discovery:
Section: Test Organization
Auto-discover test framework:
package.json → "devDependencies" and "dependencies":
requirements.txt (if Python project):
go.mod (if Go project):
framework_detected = "[framework]"framework_detected = NoneAuto-discover test directory structure:
"tests/e2e/**/*.{js,ts,py,go}""tests/integration/**/*.{js,ts,py,go}""tests/unit/**/*.{js,ts,py,go}"e2e_count = len(e2e_files)integration_count = len(integration_files)unit_count = len(unit_files)tests/
e2e/ (empty, ready for E2E tests)
integration/ (empty, ready for Integration tests)
unit/ (empty, ready for Unit tests)
Auto-discover naming conventions:
*.test.js → "*.test.js" convention*.spec.ts → "*.spec.ts" conventiontest_*.py → "test_*.py" convention*_test.go → "*_test.go" conventionCheck Test Organization section content:
Section: Running Tests
Auto-discover test runner command:
package.json → "scripts" → "test""jest" → Test runner: "npm test" (runs jest)"vitest" → Test runner: "npm test" (runs vitest)"mocha" → Test runner: "npm test" (runs mocha)Auto-discover coverage command (optional):
package.json → "scripts" for:
Check Running Tests section content:
3.4 Report content validation:
✅ Content validation complete:
- testing-strategy.md: [2 sections checked]
- tests/README.md: [2 sections checked]
- Test framework: [detected framework or "Not detected"]
- Test structure: [e2e/integration/unit counts or "Created placeholder"]
- Naming convention: [pattern or "Framework default"]
- Test runner: [command]
- Coverage command: [command]
docs/reference/guides/
└── testing-strategy.md # Universal testing philosophy (465 lines)
tests/
└── README.md # Test organization + Story-Level Pattern (112 lines)
Note: Actual test directories (e2e/, integration/, unit/) created during Story test task execution or Phase 3 if missing.
<!-- SCOPE: ... --> tag in first 5 linesshared/references/risk_based_testing_guide.mdTesting Strategy Template:
references/testing_strategy_template.md - Universal testing philosophy with:
Tests README Template:
references/tests_readme_template.md - Test organization with:
Validation Specification:
references/questions.md (v1.0.0) - Question-driven validation:
Invoked by: ln-110-documents-pipeline orchestrator
Requires:
docs/reference/guides/ directory (created by ln-112-reference-docs-creator or Phase 1 if missing)Creates:
docs/reference/guides/testing-strategy.md (universal testing philosophy)tests/README.md (test organization structure)Before completing work, verify ALL checkpoints:
✅ Structure Created (Phase 1):
docs/reference/guides/ directory existstests/ directory existstests/manual/ directory existstests/manual/results/ directory existstests/manual/results/ added to .gitignoretesting-strategy.md exists (created or existing)tests/README.md exists (created or existing)✅ Structure Validated (Phase 2):
✅ Content Validated (Phase 3):
✅ Reporting:
Standards:
Language: English only
Auto-Discovery Support:
Version: 7.2.0 Last Updated: 2026-01-15
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Regression check — diff a live page's web accessibility (a11y) violations against a baseline. By default it compares your uncommitted changes (stash-based); pass `--branch [<name>]` to compare against a branch. Reports the new WCAG violations introduced, the ones fixed, and the count of pre-existing ones. Use it for 'did my change break accessibility', 'what a11y issues did this PR add', or as a CI gate. For a full scan of one page use `accessibility-scan`; for a whole site use `accessibility-audit`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。