本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

ln-513-regression-checker

Worker that runs existing tests to catch regressions. Auto-detects framework, reports pass/fail. No status changes or task creation.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md3.0 KB
  • references/pytest_configuration.md4.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Paths: File paths (shared/, references/, ../ln-*) are relative to skills repo root. If not found at CWD, locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root.

Regression Checker

Runs the existing test suite to ensure no regressions after implementation changes.

Inputs

InputRequiredSourceDescription
storyIdYesargs, git branch, kanban, userStory to process

Resolution: Story Resolution Chain. Status filter: To Review

Purpose & Scope

  • Detect test framework (pytest/jest/vitest/go test/etc.) and test dirs.
  • Execute full suite; capture stdout/stderr for Story quality gate.
  • Return PASS/FAIL with counts/log excerpts; never modifies Linear or kanban.
  • Preserve full stdout/stderr output for downstream log analysis.

When to Use

  • After code quality checks pass
  • Code quality check passed

Workflow

Phase 0: Resolve Inputs

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/input_resolution_pattern.md, shared/references/ci_tool_detection.md

  1. Resolve storyId: Run Story Resolution Chain per guide (status filter: [To Review]).

Phase 1: Execute Tests

MANDATORY READ: Load docs/project/infrastructure.md, docs/project/runbook.md, shared/references/output_normalization.md

  1. Auto-discover test framework per ci_tool_detection.md Command Registry (Test Frameworks section).
  2. Get service endpoints, port allocation from infrastructure.md. Get exact test commands, Docker setup, environment variables from runbook.md. Runbook commands take priority over auto-detection (per ci_tool_detection.md Discovery Hierarchy).
  3. Build appropriate test command; run with timeout (5min per ci_tool_detection.md); capture stdout/stderr.
  4. Parse results: passed/failed counts; key failing tests.
  5. Normalize + group failures: Apply shared/references/output_normalization.md §1-§3 to test output. Group failing tests by error category (Import/Module, Assertion, Timeout, Type, Connection, Runtime). Report grouped: e.g., "3 Import errors in auth/, 2 Assertion mismatches in payment/".
  6. Output verdict JSON (PASS or FAIL + grouped failures list) and add Linear comment.

Critical Rules

  • No selective test runs; run full suite.
  • Do not fix tests or change status; only report.
  • Language preservation in comment (EN/RU).

Definition of Done

  • Framework detected; command executed
  • Results parsed; verdict produced with failing tests (if any)
  • Linear comment posted with summary

Reference Files

  • Risk-based limits used downstream: shared/references/risk_based_testing_guide.md
  • CI tool detection: shared/references/ci_tool_detection.md
  • Output normalization: shared/references/output_normalization.md
  • Pytest patterns: references/pytest_configuration.md

Version: 3.1.0 Last Updated: 2026-01-09

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

Regression check — diff a live page's web accessibility (a11y) violations against a baseline. By default it compares your uncommitted changes (stash-based); pass `--branch [<name>]` to compare against a branch. Reports the new WCAG violations introduced, the ones fixed, and the count of pre-existing ones. Use it for 'did my change break accessibility', 'what a11y issues did this PR add', or as a CI gate. For a full scan of one page use `accessibility-scan`; for a whole site use `accessibility-audit`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

tensology のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する