本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

ln-624-code-quality-auditor

Checks cyclomatic complexity, nesting, long methods, god classes, method signatures, O(n²), N+1 queries, constants management. Returns findings.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md12.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Paths: File paths (shared/, references/, ../ln-*) are relative to skills repo root. If not found at CWD, locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root.

Code Quality Auditor (L3 Worker)

Specialized worker auditing code complexity, method signatures, algorithms, and constants management.

Purpose & Scope

  • Worker in ln-620 coordinator pipeline - invoked by ln-620-codebase-auditor
  • Audit code quality (Categories 5+6+NEW: Medium Priority)
  • Check complexity metrics, method signature quality, algorithmic efficiency, constants management
  • Return structured findings with severity, location, effort, recommendations
  • Calculate compliance score (X/10) for Code Quality category

Inputs (from Coordinator)

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.

Receives contextStore with: tech_stack, best_practices, principles, codebase_root, output_dir.

Domain-aware: Supports domain_mode + current_domain (see audit_output_schema.md#domain-aware-worker-output).

Workflow

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/two_layer_detection.md for detection methodology.

  1. Parse context — extract fields, determine scan_path (domain-aware if specified), extract output_dir
  2. Scan codebase for violations (Layer 1)
    • All Grep/Glob patterns use scan_path (not codebase_root)
    • Example: Grep(pattern="if.*if.*if", path=scan_path) for nesting detection
  3. Analyze context per candidate (Layer 2 — MANDATORY) Layer 1 finding without Layer 2 = NOT a valid finding. Before reporting, ask: "Is this violation intentional or justified by design?"
    • Cyclomatic complexity: is complexity from switch/case on enum (valid) or deeply nested conditions (bad)? Enum dispatch → downgrade to LOW or skip
    • O(n²): read context — what's n? If bounded (n < 100), downgrade severity
    • N+1: read ORM config — does it have eager loading configured elsewhere? Admin-only endpoint → downgrade severity
    • God class: is it a config/schema/builder class? → downgrade
    • Cascade depth: already traces calls (implicit Layer 2). Orchestrator function → SEB does NOT apply (see Conflict Resolution in ARCH-AI-SEB)
  4. Collect findings with severity, location, effort, recommendation
    • Tag each finding with domain: domain_name (if domain-aware)
  5. Calculate score using penalty algorithm
  6. Write Report: Build full markdown report in memory per shared/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md, write to {output_dir}/624-quality-{domain}.md (or 624-quality.md in global mode) in single Write call
  7. Return Summary: Return minimal summary to coordinator (see Output Format)

Audit Rules (Priority: MEDIUM)

1. Cyclomatic Complexity

What: Too many decision points in single function (> 10)

Detection:

  • Count if/else, switch/case, ternary, &&, ||, for, while
  • Use tools: eslint-plugin-complexity, radon (Python), gocyclo (Go)

Severity:

  • HIGH: Complexity > 20 (extremely hard to test)
  • MEDIUM: Complexity 11-20 (refactor recommended)
  • LOW: Complexity 8-10 (acceptable but monitor)
  • Downgrade when: Enum/switch dispatch, state machines, parser grammars → downgrade to LOW or skip

Recommendation: Split function, extract helper methods, use early returns

Effort: M-L (depends on complexity)

2. Deep Nesting (> 4 levels)

What: Nested if/for/while blocks too deep

Detection:

  • Count indentation levels
  • Pattern: if { if { if { if { if { ... } } } } }

Severity:

  • HIGH: > 6 levels (unreadable)
  • MEDIUM: 5-6 levels
  • LOW: 4 levels
  • Downgrade when: Nesting from early-return guard clauses (structurally deep but linear logic) → downgrade

Recommendation: Extract functions, use guard clauses, invert conditions

Effort: M (refactor structure)

3. Long Methods (> 50 lines)

What: Functions too long, doing too much

Detection:

  • Count lines between function start and end
  • Exclude comments, blank lines

Severity:

  • HIGH: > 100 lines
  • MEDIUM: 51-100 lines
  • LOW: 40-50 lines (borderline)
  • Downgrade when: Orchestrator functions with sequential delegation; data transformation pipelines → downgrade

Recommendation: Split into smaller functions, apply Single Responsibility

Effort: M (extract logic)

4. God Classes/Modules (> 500 lines)

What: Files with too many responsibilities

Detection:

  • Count lines in file (exclude comments)
  • Check number of public methods/functions

Severity:

  • HIGH: > 1000 lines
  • MEDIUM: 501-1000 lines
  • LOW: 400-500 lines
  • Downgrade when: Config/schema/migration files, generated code, barrel/index files → skip

Recommendation: Split into multiple files, apply separation of concerns

Effort: L (major refactor)

5. Too Many Parameters (> 5)

What: Functions with excessive parameters

Detection:

  • Count function parameters
  • Check constructors, methods

Severity:

  • MEDIUM: 6-8 parameters
  • LOW: 5 parameters (borderline)
  • Downgrade when: Builder/options pattern constructor; framework-required signatures (middleware, hooks) → skip

Recommendation: Use parameter object, builder pattern, default parameters

Effort: S-M (refactor signature + calls)

6. O(n²) or Worse Algorithms

What: Inefficient nested loops over collections

Detection:

  • Nested for loops: for (i) { for (j) { ... } }
  • Nested array methods: arr.map(x => arr.filter(...))

Severity:

  • HIGH: O(n²) in hot path (API request handler)
  • MEDIUM: O(n²) in occasional operations
  • LOW: O(n²) on small datasets (n < 100)
  • Downgrade when: Bounded n (n < 100 guaranteed by domain); one-time init/migration code → downgrade to LOW or skip

Recommendation: Use hash maps, optimize with single pass, use better data structures

Effort: M (algorithm redesign)

7. N+1 Query Patterns

What: ORM lazy loading causing N+1 queries

Detection:

  • Find loops with database queries inside
  • Check ORM patterns: users.forEach(u => u.getPosts())

Severity:

  • CRITICAL: N+1 in API endpoint (performance disaster)
  • HIGH: N+1 in frequent operations
  • MEDIUM: N+1 in admin panel
  • Downgrade when: Admin-only endpoint called ≤1x/day → downgrade to LOW. Eager loading configured elsewhere in ORM → skip

Recommendation: Use eager loading, batch queries, JOIN

Effort: M (change ORM query)

8. Constants Management (NEW)

What: Magic numbers/strings, decentralized constants, duplicates

Detection:

IssuePatternExample
Magic numbersHardcoded numbers in conditions/calculationsif (status === 2)
Magic stringsHardcoded strings in comparisonsif (role === 'admin')
DecentralizedConstants scattered across filesMAX_SIZE = 100 in 5 files
DuplicatesSame value multiple timesSTATUS_ACTIVE = 1 in 3 places
No central fileMissing constants.ts or config.pyNo single source of truth

Severity:

  • HIGH: Magic numbers in business logic (payment amounts, statuses)
  • MEDIUM: Duplicate constants (same value defined 3+ times)
  • MEDIUM: No central constants file
  • LOW: Magic strings in logging/debugging
  • Downgrade when: HTTP status codes (200, 404, 500) → skip. Math constants (0, 1, -1) in algorithms → skip. Test data → skip

Recommendation:

  • Create central constants file (constants.ts, config.py, constants.go)
  • Extract magic numbers to named constants: const STATUS_ACTIVE = 1
  • Consolidate duplicates, import from central file
  • Use enums for related constants

Effort: M (extract constants, update imports, consolidate)

9. Method Signature Quality

What: Poor method contracts reducing readability and maintainability

Detection:

IssuePatternExample
Boolean flag params>=2 boolean params in signaturedef process(data, is_async: bool, skip_validation: bool)
Too many optional params>=3 optional params with defaultsdef query(db, limit=10, offset=0, sort="id", order="asc")
Inconsistent verb namingDifferent verbs for same operation type in one moduleget_user() vs fetch_account() vs load_profile()
Unclear return type-> dict, -> Any, -> tuple without TypedDict/NamedTupledef get_stats() -> dict instead of -> StatsResponse

Severity:

  • MEDIUM: Boolean flag params (use enum/strategy), unclear return types
  • LOW: Too many optional params, inconsistent naming

Recommendation:

  • Boolean flags: replace with enum, strategy pattern, or separate methods
  • Optional params: group into config/options dataclass
  • Naming: standardize verb conventions per module (get_ for sync, fetch_ for async, etc.)
  • Return types: use TypedDict, NamedTuple, or dataclass instead of raw dict/tuple

Effort: S-M (refactor signatures + callers)

10. Side-Effect Cascade Depth

What: Functions triggering cascading chains of external side-effects (DB writes → notifications → metrics → limits).

Detection: MANDATORY READ: shared/references/ai_ready_architecture.md for side-effect markers, false positive exclusions, and opaque sink rules.

  • Glob **/services/**/*.{py,ts,js,cs,java} to find service files
  • For each public function: check body for side-effect markers (per reference)
  • Recursively follow called internal functions for additional markers
  • Calculate max chain depth from entry point

Severity:

  • HIGH: cascade_depth >= 4
  • MEDIUM: cascade_depth = 3
  • OK: depth <= 2
  • Downgrade when: Orchestrator/coordinator functions (imports 3+ services AND delegates sequentially) → skip. Depth from opaque sinks (logging, metrics) → skip

Conflict Resolution: IF function is an orchestrator/coordinator (imports 3+ services AND delegates to them sequentially) → ARCH-AI-SEB does NOT apply. Orchestrators are EXPECTED to have multiple side-effect categories. Only flag SEB for leaf functions.

Recommendation: Refactor to flat orchestration — extract side-effects into independent sink functions. See reference.

Effort: M-L

Output: Also generate summary Pipe/Sink table per module:

ModuleSinks (0-1)Shallow Pipes (2)Deep Pipes (3+)Sink Ratio

Scoring Algorithm

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md and shared/references/audit_scoring.md.

Output Format

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md and shared/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md.

Write report to {output_dir}/624-quality-{domain}.md (or 624-quality.md in global mode) with category: "Code Quality" and checks: cyclomatic_complexity, deep_nesting, long_methods, god_classes, too_many_params, quadratic_algorithms, n_plus_one, magic_numbers, method_signatures, cascade_depth.

Return summary to coordinator:

Report written: docs/project/.audit/ln-620/{YYYY-MM-DD}/624-quality-orders.md
Score: X.X/10 | Issues: N (C:N H:N M:N L:N)

Critical Rules

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.

  • Do not auto-fix: Report only
  • Domain-aware scanning: If domain_mode="domain-aware", scan ONLY scan_path (not entire codebase)
  • Tag findings: Include domain field in each finding when domain-aware
  • Context-aware: Small functions (n < 100) with O(n²) may be acceptable
  • Constants detection: Exclude test files, configs, examples
  • Metrics tools: Use existing tools when available (ESLint complexity plugin, radon, gocyclo)

Definition of Done

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.

  • contextStore parsed (including domain_mode, current_domain, output_dir)
  • scan_path determined (domain path or codebase root)
  • All 10 checks completed (scoped to scan_path):
    • complexity, nesting, length, god classes, parameters, O(n²), N+1, constants, method signatures, cascade depth
  • Findings collected with severity, location, effort, recommendation, domain
  • Score calculated
  • Report written to {output_dir}/624-quality-{domain}.md (atomic single Write call)
  • Summary returned to coordinator

Reference Files

  • Audit output schema: shared/references/audit_output_schema.md

Version: 3.0.0 Last Updated: 2025-12-23

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

Regression check — diff a live page's web accessibility (a11y) violations against a baseline. By default it compares your uncommitted changes (stash-based); pass `--branch [<name>]` to compare against a branch. Reports the new WCAG violations introduced, the ones fixed, and the count of pre-existing ones. Use it for 'did my change break accessibility', 'what a11y issues did this PR add', or as a CI gate. For a full scan of one page use `accessibility-scan`; for a whole site use `accessibility-audit`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

tensology のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する