本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

ln-627-observability-auditor

Checks structured logging, health check endpoints, metrics collection, request tracing, log levels. Returns findings with severity, location, effort, recommendations.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md5.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Paths: File paths (shared/, references/, ../ln-*) are relative to skills repo root. If not found at CWD, locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root.

Observability Auditor (L3 Worker)

Specialized worker auditing logging, monitoring, and observability.

Purpose & Scope

  • Worker in ln-620 coordinator pipeline
  • Audit observability (Category 10: Medium Priority)
  • Check logging, health checks, metrics, tracing
  • Calculate compliance score (X/10)

Inputs (from Coordinator)

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.

Receives contextStore with tech stack, framework, codebase root, output_dir.

Workflow

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/two_layer_detection.md for detection methodology.

  1. Parse context + output_dir
  2. Determine project type (Layer 2 pre-check): Is this a web service (all checks apply), CLI tool (health/probes not applicable), or library (most checks optional)? Adjust applicable checks accordingly.
  3. Check observability patterns (Layer 1: grep)
  4. Analyze context per candidate (Layer 2):
    • Structured logging: is this a library (no logging OK) or a service (logging required)?
    • Health endpoints: web service → required. CLI/library → skip
    • Request tracing: monolith → less needed. Microservice → critical
  5. Collect confirmed findings
  6. Calculate score
  7. Write Report: Build full markdown report in memory per shared/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md, write to {output_dir}/627-observability.md in single Write call
  8. Return Summary: Return minimal summary to coordinator

Audit Rules

1. Structured Logging

Detection:

  • Grep for console.log (unstructured)
  • Check for proper logger: winston, pino, logrus, zap

Severity:

  • MEDIUM: Production code using console.log
  • LOW: Dev code using console.log

Recommendation: Use structured logger (winston, pino)

Effort: M (add logger, replace calls)

2. Health Check Endpoints

Detection:

  • Grep for /health, /ready, /live routes
  • Check API route definitions

Severity:

  • HIGH: No health check endpoint (monitoring blind spot)

Recommendation: Add /health endpoint

Effort: S (add simple route)

3. Metrics Collection

Detection:

  • Check for Prometheus client, StatsD, CloudWatch
  • Grep for metric recording: histogram, counter

Severity:

  • MEDIUM: No metrics instrumentation

Recommendation: Add Prometheus metrics

Effort: M (instrument code)

4. Request Tracing

Detection:

  • Check for correlation IDs in logs
  • Verify trace propagation (OpenTelemetry, Zipkin)

Severity:

  • MEDIUM: No correlation IDs (hard to debug distributed systems)

Recommendation: Add request ID middleware

Effort: M (add middleware, propagate IDs)

5. Log Levels

Detection:

  • Check if logger supports levels (info, warn, error, debug)
  • Verify proper level usage

Severity:

  • LOW: Only error logging (insufficient visibility)

Recommendation: Add info/debug logs

Effort: S (add log statements)

Scoring Algorithm

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md and shared/references/audit_scoring.md.

Output Format

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md and shared/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md.

Write report to {output_dir}/627-observability.md with category: "Observability" and checks: structured_logging, health_endpoints, metrics_collection, request_tracing, log_levels.

Return summary to coordinator:

Report written: docs/project/.audit/ln-620/{YYYY-MM-DD}/627-observability.md
Score: X.X/10 | Issues: N (C:N H:N M:N L:N)

Reference Files

  • Audit output schema: shared/references/audit_output_schema.md

Critical Rules

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.

  • Do not auto-fix: Report only, never inject logging or endpoints
  • Framework-aware detection: Adapt patterns to project's tech stack (winston/pino for Node, logrus/zap for Go, etc.)
  • Effort realism: S = <1h, M = 1-4h, L = >4h
  • Exclusions: Skip test files for console.log detection, skip dev-only scripts
  • Context-sensitive severity: console.log in production code = MEDIUM, in dev utilities = LOW

Definition of Done

MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.

  • contextStore parsed (tech stack, framework, output_dir)
  • All 5 checks completed (structured logging, health endpoints, metrics, request tracing, log levels)
  • Findings collected with severity, location, effort, recommendation
  • Score calculated per shared/references/audit_scoring.md
  • Report written to {output_dir}/627-observability.md (atomic single Write call)
  • Summary returned to coordinator

Version: 3.0.0 Last Updated: 2025-12-23

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

Regression check — diff a live page's web accessibility (a11y) violations against a baseline. By default it compares your uncommitted changes (stash-based); pass `--branch [<name>]` to compare against a branch. Reports the new WCAG violations introduced, the ones fixed, and the count of pre-existing ones. Use it for 'did my change break accessibility', 'what a11y issues did this PR add', or as a CI gate. For a full scan of one page use `accessibility-scan`; for a whole site use `accessibility-audit`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

tensology のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する