Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Checks layer leakage in method signatures, missing DTOs, entity leakage to API, inconsistent error contracts. Returns findings with penalty-based scoring.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Paths: File paths (
shared/,references/,../ln-*) are relative to skills repo root. If not found at CWD, locate this SKILL.md directory and go up one level for repo root.
Specialized worker auditing API contracts, method signatures at service boundaries, and DTO usage patterns.
Out of Scope (owned by ln-623-code-principles-auditor):
- pattern: "API Contracts" # Pattern name
- locations: string[] # Service/API directories
- adr_reference: string # Path to related ADR
- bestPractices: object # Best practices from MCP Ref/Context7
- output_dir: string # e.g., "docs/project/.audit/ln-640/{YYYY-MM-DD}"
# Domain-aware (optional, from coordinator)
- domain_mode: "global" | "domain-aware" # Default: "global"
- current_domain: string # e.g., "users", "billing" (only if domain-aware)
- scan_path: string # e.g., "src/users/" (only if domain-aware)
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/two_layer_detection.md for detection methodology. Load references/detection_patterns.md — language-specific Grep patterns for all 5 rules.
scan_root = scan_path IF domain_mode == "domain-aware" ELSE codebase_root
1. Find API layer: Glob("**/api/**/*.py", "**/routes/**/*.ts", "**/controllers/**/*.ts", root=scan_root)
2. Find service layer: Glob("**/services/**/*.py", "**/services/**/*.ts", root=scan_root)
3. Find domain layer: Glob("**/domain/**/*.py", "**/models/**/*.py", root=scan_root)
4. Map: which services are called by which API endpoints
MANDATORY READ: Use detection_patterns.md for language-specific Grep patterns per rule.
| # | Rule | Severity | What to Check |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Layer Leakage | HIGH/MEDIUM | Service/domain accepts HTTP types (Request, parsed_body, headers) |
| 2 | Missing DTO | MEDIUM/LOW | 4+ params repeated in 2+ methods without grouping DTO |
| 3 | Entity Leakage | HIGH/MEDIUM | ORM entity returned from API without response DTO. Downgrade when: internal API with no external consumers → LOW |
| 4 | Error Contracts | MEDIUM/LOW | Mixed error patterns (raise + return None) in same service |
| 5 | Redundant Overloads | LOW/MEDIUM | Method pairs with _with_/_and_ suffix differing by 1-2 params |
| 6 | Architectural Honesty | HIGH/MEDIUM | Read-named function (get_/find_/check_/validate_/is_/has_) body contains write side-effects. Exclusions per shared/references/ai_ready_architecture.md |
Scope boundary: SKIP DUPLICATION findings (owned by ln-623), REPORT only ARCHITECTURE BOUNDARY findings.
Compliance Score (0-100):
| Criterion | Points |
|---|---|
| No layer leakage (HTTP types in service) | +35 |
| Consistent error handling pattern | +25 |
| Follows project naming conventions | +10 |
| No hidden side-effects in read-named functions | +10 |
| No entity leakage to API | +20 |
Completeness Score (0-100):
| Criterion | Points |
|---|---|
| All service methods have typed params | +30 |
| All service methods have typed returns | +30 |
| DTOs defined for complex data | +20 |
| Error types documented/typed | +20 |
Quality Score (0-100):
| Criterion | Points |
|---|---|
| No boolean flag params in service methods | +15 |
| No opaque return types hiding write actions | +10 |
| No methods with >5 params without DTO | +25 |
| Consistent naming across module | +25 |
| No redundant overloads | +25 |
Implementation Score (0-100):
| Criterion | Points |
|---|---|
| DTOs/schemas exist and are used | +30 |
| Type annotations present | +25 |
| Validation at boundaries (Pydantic, Zod) | +25 |
| API response DTOs separate from domain | +20 |
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md and shared/references/audit_scoring.md.
Primary score uses penalty formula (same as all workers):
penalty = (critical × 2.0) + (high × 1.0) + (medium × 0.5) + (low × 0.2)
score = max(0, 10 - penalty)
Diagnostic sub-scores (0-100 each) are calculated separately and reported in AUDIT-META for diagnostic purposes only.
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md and shared/templates/audit_worker_report_template.md.
# Build markdown report in memory with:
# - AUDIT-META (extended: score [penalty-based] + diagnostic score_compliance/completeness/quality/implementation)
# - Checks table (layer_leakage, missing_dto, entity_leakage, error_contracts, redundant_overloads)
# - Findings table (issues sorted by severity)
# - DATA-EXTENDED: issues array with principle + domain fields (for cross-domain aggregation)
IF domain_mode == "domain-aware":
Write to {output_dir}/643-api-contract-{current_domain}.md
ELSE:
Write to {output_dir}/643-api-contract.md
Report written: docs/project/.audit/ln-640/{YYYY-MM-DD}/643-api-contract-users.md
Score: 6.75/10 (C:65 K:70 Q:55 I:80) | Issues: 4 (H:2 M:1 L:1)
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.
MANDATORY READ: Load shared/references/audit_worker_core_contract.md.
{output_dir}/643-api-contract[-{domain}].md (atomic single Write call)references/detection_patterns.md../ln-640-pattern-evolution-auditor/references/scoring_rules.md../ln-640-pattern-evolution-auditor/references/pattern_library.mdVersion: 2.0.0 Last Updated: 2026-02-08
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Regression check — diff a live page's web accessibility (a11y) violations against a baseline. By default it compares your uncommitted changes (stash-based); pass `--branch [<name>]` to compare against a branch. Reports the new WCAG violations introduced, the ones fixed, and the count of pre-existing ones. Use it for 'did my change break accessibility', 'what a11y issues did this PR add', or as a CI gate. For a full scan of one page use `accessibility-scan`; for a whole site use `accessibility-audit`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。