本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

product-marketing

When the user wants to create or update their product marketing context document. Also use when the user mentions 'product context,' 'marketing context,' 'set up context,' 'positioning,' 'who is my target audience,' 'describe my product,' 'ICP,' 'ideal customer profile,' or wants to avoid repeating foundational information across marketing tasks. Use this at the start of any new project before using other marketing skills — it creates `.agents/product-marketing.md` that all other skills reference for product, audience, and positioning context.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md7.5 KB
  • evals/evals.json5.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Product Marketing Context

You help users create and maintain a product marketing context document. This captures foundational positioning and messaging information that other marketing skills reference, so users don't repeat themselves.

The document is stored at .agents/product-marketing.md.

Workflow

Step 1: Check for Existing Context

First, check if .agents/product-marketing.md already exists. Also check .claude/product-marketing.md and the legacy filename product-marketing-context.md (in either .agents/ or .claude/) for older setups — if found anywhere other than .agents/product-marketing.md, offer to move it to the canonical location.

If it exists:

  • Read it and summarize what's captured
  • Ask which sections they want to update
  • Only gather info for those sections

If it doesn't exist, offer two options:

  1. Auto-draft from codebase (recommended): You'll study the repo—README, landing pages, marketing copy, package.json, etc.—and draft a V1 of the context document. The user then reviews, corrects, and fills gaps. This is faster than starting from scratch.

  2. Start from scratch: Walk through each section conversationally, gathering info one section at a time.

Most users prefer option 1. After presenting the draft, ask: "What needs correcting? What's missing?"

Step 2: Gather Information

If auto-drafting:

  1. Read the codebase: README, landing pages, marketing copy, about pages, meta descriptions, package.json, any existing docs
  2. Draft all sections based on what you find
  3. Present the draft and ask what needs correcting or is missing
  4. Iterate until the user is satisfied

If starting from scratch: Walk through each section below conversationally, one at a time. Don't dump all questions at once.

For each section:

  1. Briefly explain what you're capturing
  2. Ask relevant questions
  3. Confirm accuracy
  4. Move to the next

Push for verbatim customer language — exact phrases are more valuable than polished descriptions because they reflect how customers actually think and speak, which makes copy more resonant.


Sections to Capture

1. Product Overview

  • One-line description
  • What it does (2-3 sentences)
  • Product category (what "shelf" you sit on—how customers search for you)
  • Product type (SaaS, marketplace, e-commerce, service, etc.)
  • Business model and pricing

2. Target Audience

  • Target company type (industry, size, stage)
  • Target decision-makers (roles, departments)
  • Primary use case (the main problem you solve)
  • Jobs to be done (2-3 things customers "hire" you for)
  • Specific use cases or scenarios

3. Personas (B2B only)

If multiple stakeholders are involved in buying, capture for each:

  • User, Champion, Decision Maker, Financial Buyer, Technical Influencer
  • What each cares about, their challenge, and the value you promise them

4. Problems & Pain Points

  • Core challenge customers face before finding you
  • Why current solutions fall short
  • What it costs them (time, money, opportunities)
  • Emotional tension (stress, fear, doubt)

5. Competitive Landscape

  • Direct competitors: Same solution, same problem (e.g., Calendly vs SavvyCal)
  • Secondary competitors: Different solution, same problem (e.g., Calendly vs Superhuman scheduling)
  • Indirect competitors: Conflicting approach (e.g., Calendly vs personal assistant)
  • How each falls short for customers

6. Differentiation

  • Key differentiators (capabilities alternatives lack)
  • How you solve it differently
  • Why that's better (benefits)
  • Why customers choose you over alternatives

7. Objections & Anti-Personas

  • Top 3 objections heard in sales and how to address them
  • Who is NOT a good fit (anti-persona)

8. Switching Dynamics

The JTBD Four Forces:

  • Push: What frustrations drive them away from current solution
  • Pull: What attracts them to you
  • Habit: What keeps them stuck with current approach
  • Anxiety: What worries them about switching

9. Customer Language

  • How customers describe the problem (verbatim)
  • How they describe your solution (verbatim)
  • Words/phrases to use
  • Words/phrases to avoid
  • Glossary of product-specific terms

10. Brand Voice

  • Tone (professional, casual, playful, etc.)
  • Communication style (direct, conversational, technical)
  • Brand personality (3-5 adjectives)

11. Proof Points

  • Key metrics or results to cite
  • Notable customers/logos
  • Testimonial snippets
  • Main value themes and supporting evidence

12. Goals

  • Primary business goal
  • Key conversion action (what you want people to do)
  • Current metrics (if known)

Step 3: Create the Document

After gathering information, create .agents/product-marketing.md with this structure:

# Product Marketing Context

*Last updated: [date]*

## Product Overview
**One-liner:**
**What it does:**
**Product category:**
**Product type:**
**Business model:**

## Target Audience
**Target companies:**
**Decision-makers:**
**Primary use case:**
**Jobs to be done:**
-
**Use cases:**
-

## Personas
| Persona | Cares about | Challenge | Value we promise |
|---------|-------------|-----------|------------------|
| | | | |

## Problems & Pain Points
**Core problem:**
**Why alternatives fall short:**
-
**What it costs them:**
**Emotional tension:**

## Competitive Landscape
**Direct:** [Competitor] — falls short because...
**Secondary:** [Approach] — falls short because...
**Indirect:** [Alternative] — falls short because...

## Differentiation
**Key differentiators:**
-
**How we do it differently:**
**Why that's better:**
**Why customers choose us:**

## Objections
| Objection | Response |
|-----------|----------|
| | |

**Anti-persona:**

## Switching Dynamics
**Push:**
**Pull:**
**Habit:**
**Anxiety:**

## Customer Language
**How they describe the problem:**
- "[verbatim]"
**How they describe us:**
- "[verbatim]"
**Words to use:**
**Words to avoid:**
**Glossary:**
| Term | Meaning |
|------|---------|
| | |

## Brand Voice
**Tone:**
**Style:**
**Personality:**

## Proof Points
**Metrics:**
**Customers:**
**Testimonials:**
> "[quote]" — [who]
**Value themes:**
| Theme | Proof |
|-------|-------|
| | |

## Goals
**Business goal:**
**Conversion action:**
**Current metrics:**

Step 4: Confirm and Save

  • Show the completed document
  • Ask if anything needs adjustment
  • Save to .agents/product-marketing.md
  • Tell them: "Other marketing skills will now use this context automatically. Run /product-marketing anytime to update it."

Tips

  • Be specific: Ask "What's the #1 frustration that brings them to you?" not "What problem do they solve?"
  • Capture exact words: Customer language beats polished descriptions
  • Ask for examples: "Can you give me an example?" unlocks better answers
  • Validate as you go: Summarize each section and confirm before moving on
  • Skip what doesn't apply: Not every product needs all sections (e.g., Personas for B2C)

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA standards. Use this skill to generate semantic ARIA for Web and accessibility traits for Web and Native platforms (iOS/Android).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

Regression check — diff a live page's web accessibility (a11y) violations against a baseline. By default it compares your uncommitted changes (stash-based); pass `--branch [<name>]` to compare against a branch. Reports the new WCAG violations introduced, the ones fixed, and the count of pre-existing ones. Use it for 'did my change break accessibility', 'what a11y issues did this PR add', or as a CI gate. For a full scan of one page use `accessibility-scan`; for a whole site use `accessibility-audit`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

Remediation only — repair web accessibility (a11y) violations against WCAG 2.2 with a baseline, edit, and verify loop. Takes a target (URL, files, directory) or a findings worklist from `accessibility-scan`/`accessibility-inspect`/`accessibility-audit`, applies mechanical fixes as given, leaves TODOs for visual or contextual judgment, and verifies by re-running the baseline check. It only fixes. To find issues use `accessibility-scan` (one page, automated), `accessibility-inspect` (one page, manual), or `accessibility-audit` (whole site, WCAG-EM); to check for regressions use `accessibility-diff`. Use it for 'fix the a11y issues in X', 'make this accessible', 'add missing alt text and labels', 'apply these accessibility fixes', 'remediate these violations'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

One page, automated tier — run the web accessibility (a11y) rule engine against a live page and locate every violation it can detect mechanically. Pass a URL, a config target name (e.g. `accesslint:accessibility-scan dev`), or nothing to use the default target from `accesslint.config.json`. Ensures a debuggable Chrome, runs the @accesslint/core engine over CDP, and returns a worklist of live-DOM WCAG 2.2 violations, each grounded to its DOM selector and source `file:line`. Locates; doesn't edit. Use it for 'is this page accessible', 'check a11y on this URL', 'find contrast and alt-text issues', or to verify a UI change. For hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`; for a whole site or product use `accessibility-audit`; to diff against uncommitted changes or a branch use `accessibility-diff`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

tensology のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する