本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

domain-name-brainstormer

Generates creative, research-backed domain name ideas and checks availability with competitor analysis, pattern recognition, and quality scoring. Use when brainstorming brandable domains for a product or project.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md8.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Domain Name Brainstormer v2

Find the perfect domain through research-backed naming strategies, competitor analysis, and intelligent pattern matching.

What's New in v2

  • Competitor Pattern Analysis: Study what works in your space
  • Naming Strategy Frameworks: Different approaches for different goals
  • Quality Scoring: Rate suggestions on memorability, length, pronounceability
  • Book/Product/Personal Brand Modes: Different strategies for different contexts
  • Smart Availability Checking: Guide users to verify, not guess

Step 1: Understand the Context

Before generating names, gather essential context:

CRITICAL QUESTIONS:
1. What are you building? (book, product, personal brand, company)
2. Who is your audience? (developers, consumers, businesses)
3. What's the primary goal? (sales, authority, community)
4. What's your name/brand already? (existing recognition)
5. Will this be your ONLY project or one of many?
6. Is this a standalone product or part of a larger ecosystem?

Determine the Pattern Type

TypeExamplesDomain Strategy
Personal Brandjamesclear.com, wesbos.comYourName.com
Book as Productrefactoringui.com, eloquentjavascript.netBookName.com or concept.com
Multi-Book Authorpatterns.addy.ie, prodengineer.orgTopic-specific domains
Company/Toolstripe.com, vercel.comBrandable made-up word
Community/Contentjavascript.info, css-tricks.comDescriptive + .com/.info

Step 2: Research Competitors

For Books:

Research 5-10 successful books in your niche:
1. What domains do they use?
2. Is it personal name or book-specific?
3. Do they use .com, .dev, .net, or other?
4. What's the pattern? (short, descriptive, brandable)
5. What do you want to emulate vs avoid?

For Products:

Research direct competitors and adjacent tools:
1. What naming conventions dominate?
2. Are they descriptive (stripe.com) or brandable (vercel.com)?
3. What TLDs are standard in this space?
4. Are there naming trends to follow or buck?

Step 3: Generate Names Using Frameworks

Framework A: The Compound

Combine two relevant words.

Examples:
- code + academy = codecademy.com
- web + flow = webflow.com
- git + hub = github.com

Pattern: [word1][word2].com
Quality: High if both words are short and common

Framework B: The Modifier

Add a modifier to a core word.

Modifiers: get, go, try, use, hey, hi, my, the, up

Examples:
- getdropbox.com (now dropbox.com)
- golang.org
- try figma.com

Pattern: [modifier][word].com or [word][modifier].com
Quality: Medium - can feel generic if overused

Framework C: The Abbreviation

Shorten long words or phrases.

Examples:
- practical junior devs → pjd.dev, prac.dev
- frontend checklist → fc.dev, feck.dev
- international business machines → ibm.com

Pattern: First letters or syllable reduction
Quality: High if pronounceable, low if random letters

Framework D: The Foreign Word

Use Latin, Greek, or other roots.

Examples:
- nova (new)
- altus (high)
- primus (first)
- ars (art)

Pattern: [latin/greek word].com
Quality: High for international appeal, low if obscure

Framework E: The Abstract/Brandable

Create a unique, memorable made-up word.

Examples:
- stripe, vercel, notion, linear

Techniques:
- Remove vowels: flickr, tumblr
- Add suffix: shopify, spotify
- Combine syllables: pinterest (pin + interest)

Pattern: [unique word].com
Quality: High for differentiation, requires marketing investment

Framework F: The Exact Match

Exactly what people search for.

Examples:
- javascript.info
- howtogeek.com
- learnpython.org

Pattern: [exact search term].com/.org/.info
Quality: High for SEO, low for brandability

Step 4: Quality Score Each Suggestion

Rate every suggestion on a 1-10 scale for:

CriteriaWeightQuestions
LengthHighUnder 10 chars? Easy to type?
MemorabilityHighWill they remember it tomorrow?
PronounceabilityHighCan you say it on a podcast?
SpellingMediumCan they spell it after hearing it?
UniquenessMediumDistinct from competitors?
TLD FitLowDoes .com/.dev/.io fit the audience?

Minimum viable score: 7/10


Step 5: Present Structured Recommendations

Format:

🎯 ANALYSIS: [Project type determined]
Based on your [book/product/personal brand] and research on [competitors],
here are domain strategies that fit:

## Option 1: [Strategy Name]
[Domain].com
Score: X/10
- Why: [reasoning]
- Pros: [benefits]
- Cons: [drawbacks]
- Availability: Check at [link]

## Option 2: [Strategy Name]
[Domain].com
Score: X/10
- Why: [reasoning]
- Pros: [benefits]
- Cons: [drawbacks]
- Availability: Check at [link]

## Option 3: [Strategy Name]
[Domain].com
Score: X/10
- Why: [reasoning]
- Pros: [benefits]
- Cons: [drawbacks]
- Availability: Check at [link]

🏆 RECOMMENDATION: [Domain]
Rationale: [why this fits best]

Next Steps:
1. Check availability at porkbun.com or namecheap.com
2. Verify social media handles (@domain on X/Twitter, Instagram)
3. Say it out loud 3 times
4. Ask 2 people to spell it after hearing it
5. Register immediately if available

Step 6: Avoid Common Mistakes

❌ Don't Suggest:

  • Hyphens (hard to communicate)
  • Numbers (is it "4" or "four"?)
  • Homophones (to/too/two, hear/here)
  • Double letters (bookkeeper - easy to misspell)
  • Trademarked terms
  • Obscure words requiring explanation
  • Long domains over 15 characters

❌ Don't Claim:

  • "This is available" without checking
  • "This is the best" without context
  • Specific pricing without current data

✅ Always:

  • Provide reasoning for each suggestion
  • Suggest 3-5 quality options, not 20 mediocre ones
  • Guide users to verify availability themselves
  • Consider the full brand (domain + social handles)
  • Think about the 5-year future, not just today

Example Output (Quality)

User: "I need a domain for my junior developer book"

Research:

  • Competitors: personal domains dominate (wesbos.com, jamesclear.com)
  • Exceptions: book-as-product uses book domains (refactoringui.com)
  • Your context: single book, direct sales, standalone product

Analysis: Book-as-product pattern fits best

Suggestions:

Option 1: The Abbreviation

jrdevpath.com Score: 8/10

  • Why: Short, clear, outcome-focused (path to junior dev)
  • Pros: 10 chars, memorable, action-oriented
  • Cons: "jr" abbreviation might confuse some
  • Check: porkbun.com/domain/jrdevpath.com

Option 2: The Outcome

firstdevjob.com Score: 7/10

  • Why: Direct outcome readers want
  • Pros: Clear value proposition, SEO-friendly
  • Cons: 12 chars, limiting (only about first job)
  • Check: porkbun.com/domain/firstdevjob.com

Option 3: The Concept

devstart.com Score: 8/10

  • Why: Universal concept, works in multiple languages
  • Pros: Short, brandable, room to grow
  • Cons: Generic, might be taken
  • Check: porkbun.com/domain/devstart.com

🏆 RECOMMENDATION: jrdevpath.com Rationale: Balances brevity with clarity. "Jr dev" is standard shorthand, "path" implies journey/process which matches book content. Can expand to courses/community later.


Availability Checking (Manual)

Since automated availability checking requires API keys and rate limits:

Step 1: Go to instantdomainsearch.com Step 2: Type each suggestion Step 3: Green = available, Red = taken Step 4: If taken, try variations (add "the", "my", try different TLD)

Alternative checkers:

  • porkbun.com (clean interface, good prices)
  • namecheap.com (reliable, popular)
  • domains.google (now Squarespace, simple)

Version History

v2.0 - Current

  • Added competitor research framework
  • Added 6 naming frameworks (Compound, Modifier, Abbreviation, Foreign, Abstract, Exact Match)
  • Added quality scoring system
  • Added pattern types (Personal Brand, Book as Product, etc.)
  • Improved recommendation format
  • Removed false "availability checking" claims

v1.0 - Original

  • Basic domain brainstorming
  • Generic suggestions without research
  • Claimed to check availability (false)

Inspired by: Ben Aiad's use case from Lenny's Newsletter Research contributors: Fury (competitor analysis), David Dias (pattern validation)

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use when working with the 1Password CLI (`op` command) for secrets management, retrieving API keys, injecting secrets into development environments, or any task involving 1Password vault operations. Triggers on: "1password", "op command", "secrets management", "api keys from vault", "op run", "op read", "service account token".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

thedaviddias/agent-forge32026年5月18日 更新

Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting data, testing web apps, or automating any browser task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "scrape data from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

thedaviddias/agent-forge32026年5月18日 更新

Create and manage teams of specialized AI agents that work together on tasks. Use when setting up multi-agent workflows, agent squads for content/marketing/research pipelines, configuring heartbeat-based agent coordination, or managing agent personalities via SOUL.md files. Enables orchestration of multiple OpenClaw sessions as a coordinated team with shared task systems (Linear, Trello, etc.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

thedaviddias/agent-forge32026年5月18日 更新

Create algorithmic art using p5.js with seeded randomness and interactive parameter exploration. Use when users request generative art, algorithmic art, flow fields, or particle systems. Create original works rather than copying existing artists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

thedaviddias/agent-forge32026年5月18日 更新

CSS and UI animation patterns for responsive, polished interfaces. Use when implementing hover effects, tooltips, button feedback, transitions, or fixing animation issues like flicker and shakiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

thedaviddias/agent-forge32026年5月18日 更新

Use when starting creative work (features, components, functionality, or behavior changes) to clarify user intent, requirements, and design before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

thedaviddias/agent-forge32026年5月18日 更新

thedaviddias のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する