Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Use valid ARIA role values. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Invalid or misspelled ARIA roles are ignored by browsers and assistive technologies, rendering the intended accessibility features useless and potentially confusing users.
checkbox, not check-box)Search for any role attributes that use non-standard or misspelled ARIA role values.
Replace invalid ARIA roles with the correct, standard values from the WAI-ARIA specification. When a native <button>, <input>, <select>, or other semantic element can replace the custom widget, prefer that change over adding more ARIA.
Explain why using standardized ARIA roles is critical for ensuring that assistive technologies can interpret and announce elements correctly, and why native HTML controls are usually more reliable than recreating them with ARIA.
Review the rendered markup and interactive states that affect Use valid ARIA role values. Flag exact elements, roles, labels, focus behavior, or keyboard interactions that violate the rule, and note how to verify the fix with browser accessibility tooling or assistive tech.
For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance,
see references/rule.md.
Rule page: https://frontendchecklist.io/rules/accessibility/aria-roles
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Create a custom 404 error page. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability related to Create a dedicated About page. Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response rather than relying only on source files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing component libraries, page flows, or CI pipelines that need repeatable accessibility checks. Automated testing is strongest at catching structural and attribute-level issues; it does not replace keyboard, screen reader, and manual UX testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing sign-in, sign-up, MFA, CAPTCHA, recovery, and re-auth flows. Evaluate the full authentication path, including error handling and backup methods, not just the primary login form.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Make notifications accessible. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Use semantic table markup for screen readers. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。