Use when reviewing utility functions, component props, or template strings that format numbers, prices, or dates to check whether Intl APIs are used correctly.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Number and currency formatting rules differ significantly across locales — a value formatted as "$1,234.56" in the US is written "1.234,56 $" in Germany and "¥1,235" in Japan. Hardcoded formatting causes incorrect display for international users and is expensive to maintain manually as you add locales.
Identify all places in this codebase where numbers, currencies, or dates are formatted manually instead of using Intl.NumberFormat or Intl.DateTimeFormat. Also flag locale-sensitive sorting that uses plain string comparison instead of Intl.Collator and any formatter that lacks a fallback locale.
Replace manual number and currency formatting with Intl.NumberFormat and replace manual date formatting with Intl.DateTimeFormat, passing the user locale explicitly. Use Intl.Collator for locale-aware sorting and resolve a supported fallback locale when the requested locale is unavailable.
Explain why locale-aware formatting with Intl APIs is required for international applications, what goes wrong when formatting is hardcoded, and why sorting/searching should also use locale-aware comparison.
Review utility functions and components that render numbers, prices, percentages, or dates. Flag any hardcoded currency symbols, separators, or date format strings, and show Intl-based alternatives.
For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance,
see references/rule.md.
Rule page: https://frontendchecklist.io/rules/i18n/currency-formatting
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Create a custom 404 error page. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability related to Create a dedicated About page. Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response rather than relying only on source files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing component libraries, page flows, or CI pipelines that need repeatable accessibility checks. Automated testing is strongest at catching structural and attribute-level issues; it does not replace keyboard, screen reader, and manual UX testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing sign-in, sign-up, MFA, CAPTCHA, recovery, and re-auth flows. Evaluate the full authentication path, including error handling and backup methods, not just the primary login form.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Make notifications accessible. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Use semantic table markup for screen readers. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。