Use when reviewing a website for layout and functionality issues caused by adblocker filter rules targeting common ad-related class names and IDs.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
If your cookie consent banner has class .cookie-banner or ID #consent-popup, adblockers may hide it — users never see the consent notice, which can cause GDPR compliance issues and broken UX for ~30-40% of desktop users.
.ad, .ads, .advertisement, .banner, #ad, #ads, #banner, .sponsorReview the HTML source for element IDs and class names that match common adblocker patterns: .ad, .ads, .advertisement, .banner, .sponsor, #ad, #banner, .cookie-notice, .consent. Test the page with uBlock Origin enabled in a browser to identify elements that are hidden.
Rename affected elements using specific, content-focused class names that do not match adblocker patterns. For cookie consent banners specifically, use class names like .privacy-controls or .cookie-preferences instead of .cookie-banner or .gdpr-notice.
Explain how adblocker filter lists work, which HTML class names and IDs are commonly blocked, and how to rename elements to avoid false-positive blocking while maintaining their function.
Review server config, headers, forms, and integration points related to Adblock Element Hiding. Flag exact responses, cookies, or browser behaviors that violate the rule, and verify them against the effective production-like response.
For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance,
see references/rule.md.
Rule page: https://frontendchecklist.io/rules/security/element-hiding
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Create a custom 404 error page. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability related to Create a dedicated About page. Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response rather than relying only on source files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing component libraries, page flows, or CI pipelines that need repeatable accessibility checks. Automated testing is strongest at catching structural and attribute-level issues; it does not replace keyboard, screen reader, and manual UX testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing sign-in, sign-up, MFA, CAPTCHA, recovery, and re-auth flows. Evaluate the full authentication path, including error handling and backup methods, not just the primary login form.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Make notifications accessible. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Use semantic table markup for screen readers. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。