Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Ensure logical focus order. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
When focus jumps unexpectedly, keyboard users get disoriented and can't find content—mismatched visual and focus order makes navigation impossible.
Tab through the page and verify focus moves in a logical sequence matching visual layout. Check that modals trap focus appropriately, and focus returns to triggering elements when dialogs close.
Order DOM elements to match visual layout. Avoid positive tabindex values which override natural order. Use tabindex='0' for custom interactive elements and tabindex='-1' for programmatic focus management.
Explain how keyboard users rely on predictable tab order to navigate efficiently, and why mismatched visual and focus order creates confusion and reduces usability for assistive technology users.
Review the rendered markup and interactive states that affect Ensure logical focus order. Flag exact elements, roles, labels, focus behavior, or keyboard interactions that violate the rule, and note how to verify the fix with browser accessibility tooling or assistive tech.
For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance,
see references/rule.md.
Rule page: https://frontendchecklist.io/rules/accessibility/focus-order
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Create a custom 404 error page. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability related to Create a dedicated About page. Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response rather than relying only on source files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing component libraries, page flows, or CI pipelines that need repeatable accessibility checks. Automated testing is strongest at catching structural and attribute-level issues; it does not replace keyboard, screen reader, and manual UX testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing sign-in, sign-up, MFA, CAPTCHA, recovery, and re-auth flows. Evaluate the full authentication path, including error handling and backup methods, not just the primary login form.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Make notifications accessible. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Use semantic table markup for screen readers. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。