Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Use logical heading hierarchy. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Screen reader users navigate by headings like a table of contents—skipping levels or poor hierarchy makes content impossible to understand and navigate.
Verify pages have exactly one h1, headings follow sequential order without skipping levels (h1 → h2 → h3), and heading text clearly describes the content that follows. Use accessibility tools to generate a heading outline.
Structure headings to reflect content hierarchy. Start with h1 for the page title, use h2 for major sections, h3 for subsections. Never skip heading levels or use headings purely for visual styling.
Explain how screen reader users navigate by headings like a table of contents, and why skipped levels or missing structure forces users to work harder to understand page organization.
Review the rendered markup and interactive states that affect Use logical heading hierarchy. Flag exact elements, roles, labels, focus behavior, or keyboard interactions that violate the rule, and note how to verify the fix with browser accessibility tooling or assistive tech.
For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance,
see references/rule.md.
Rule page: https://frontendchecklist.io/rules/accessibility/heading-hierarchy
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Create a custom 404 error page. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability related to Create a dedicated About page. Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response rather than relying only on source files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing component libraries, page flows, or CI pipelines that need repeatable accessibility checks. Automated testing is strongest at catching structural and attribute-level issues; it does not replace keyboard, screen reader, and manual UX testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing sign-in, sign-up, MFA, CAPTCHA, recovery, and re-auth flows. Evaluate the full authentication path, including error handling and backup methods, not just the primary login form.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Make notifications accessible. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Use semantic table markup for screen readers. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。