Use when reviewing slow initial loads caused by optional features. Prioritize code that is expensive to download or execute and not required for the first viewport, first input, or core task completion.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Users should not pay the download, parse, and execution cost for features they may never use. Import-on-interaction shrinks initial JavaScript, reduces main-thread work during page load, and keeps the first view focused on content that matters immediately.
Inspect this route or component for heavy modules, widgets, or third-party scripts that load on first render but are only needed after a user clicks, focuses, hovers, or opens a panel.
Move the non-critical dependency behind a user-triggered dynamic import(), add immediate loading feedback, and ensure the initial render still works without the deferred feature.
Explain import-on-interaction, why it improves initial performance, and which features are safe to defer until the user shows intent.
Inspect event handlers, modal triggers, drawers, editors, maps, export actions, and third-party widgets. Flag code that is included in the initial bundle even though it is only needed after a user interaction, and verify the fix keeps the initial path lighter without degrading the triggered flow.
For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance,
see references/rule.md.
Rule page: https://frontendchecklist.io/rules/performance/import-on-interaction
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Create a custom 404 error page. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability related to Create a dedicated About page. Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response rather than relying only on source files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing component libraries, page flows, or CI pipelines that need repeatable accessibility checks. Automated testing is strongest at catching structural and attribute-level issues; it does not replace keyboard, screen reader, and manual UX testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing sign-in, sign-up, MFA, CAPTCHA, recovery, and re-auth flows. Evaluate the full authentication path, including error handling and backup methods, not just the primary login form.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Make notifications accessible. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Use semantic table markup for screen readers. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。