Use when generating URL slugs from article titles, auditing URL structures for unnecessary depth or length, or reviewing URL patterns in a CMS or router configuration.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
While Google has no strict URL length limit beyond technical constraints, long URLs with deep nesting, excessive parameters, or redundant words are harder for users to read, copy, and share. Google's John Mueller has confirmed that shorter, cleaner URLs are easier to understand and may perform slightly better in search.
the, a, of, in) from slugs — /guide-css-grid is better than /a-guide-to-css-grid/blog/2024/03/category/subcategory/post-title) are harder to share and signal distance from the rootFor each page URL, extract the path component (excluding domain and query string). Flag: (1) Path length over 100 characters. (2) More than 4 path segments (e.g., /a/b/c/d/e has 5 segments). (3) Common stop words in slugs (the, a, an, of, in, at, to, for, with). (4) Dates in URL paths for evergreen content (e.g., /blog/2024/03/css-guide). (5) Session IDs, tracking parameters, or other dynamic values in paths.
/how-to-optimise-your-websites-core-web-vitals → /optimise-core-web-vitals/a-comprehensive-guide-to-css-grid-layout → /css-grid-guide/blog/2024/march/technology/css-grid → /blog/css-gridGoogle recommends keeping URLs 'simple, descriptive, and readable'. Long URLs are more prone to being truncated in search snippets, harder to share, and more confusing to users. Deep URL structures (many subdirectories) do not directly harm rankings, but they can increase crawl distance from the root, reducing crawl frequency for deep pages on large sites.
Parse the pathname of each URL. Count path segments (split by /). Measure character length of the path. Flag slugs containing common stop words. Report the longest 10 URLs by character count and deepest 10 by segment count. Check whether URL generation utilities strip stop words and limit segment depth.
For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance,
see references/rule.md.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Create a custom 404 error page. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability related to Create a dedicated About page. Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response rather than relying only on source files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing component libraries, page flows, or CI pipelines that need repeatable accessibility checks. Automated testing is strongest at catching structural and attribute-level issues; it does not replace keyboard, screen reader, and manual UX testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing sign-in, sign-up, MFA, CAPTCHA, recovery, and re-auth flows. Evaluate the full authentication path, including error handling and backup methods, not just the primary login form.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Make notifications accessible. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Use semantic table markup for screen readers. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。