404-page
無料Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Create a custom 404 error page. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing content pages for AI discoverability. Applies to any informational page intended to appear in AI-generated answers, search snippets, or knowledge base extraction.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
AI assistants and answer engines (including Google's AI Overviews) extract and cite content from web pages—pages with clear structure and explicit context are more likely to be accurately cited and surfaced in AI-generated responses.
Evaluate whether the page content is parseable by an LLM. Check: (1) Is content in semantic HTML tags (<h1>–<h6>, <p>, <ul>, <ol>, <table>)? (2) Is key content accessible without JavaScript? (3) Are section headings descriptive enough to stand alone? (4) Does the page have JSON-LD structured data? (5) Are there FAQ sections or explicit Q&A patterns that match common search queries?
Restructure content into explicit HTML sections with descriptive headings. Replace JavaScript-rendered content with server-side rendered HTML. Add JSON-LD schema (Article, FAQPage, HowTo) to annotate the content type. Write headings and lead sentences that work as standalone answers—assume the reader only sees one paragraph.
Large language models and answer engines process web content by extracting text from HTML. Pages that use semantic markup, clear headings, and server-rendered content are parsed more accurately than JavaScript-heavy or visually-structured pages. As AI-generated answers increasingly cite specific web sources, well-structured content is more likely to be accurately quoted and linked.
Check the page's rendered HTML for: (1) proper heading hierarchy (h1→h2→h3), (2) content wrapped in semantic elements (<article>, <section>, <main>), (3) key content visible in initial HTML response (not injected by JS), (4) presence of FAQPage, HowTo, or Article JSON-LD schema, (5) absence of content hidden behind modals, tabs, or accordions that require JS interaction.
For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance,
see references/rule.md.
Rule page: https://frontendchecklist.io/rules/seo/llm-parsability
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Create a custom 404 error page. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability related to Create a dedicated About page. Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response rather than relying only on source files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing component libraries, page flows, or CI pipelines that need repeatable accessibility checks. Automated testing is strongest at catching structural and attribute-level issues; it does not replace keyboard, screen reader, and manual UX testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing sign-in, sign-up, MFA, CAPTCHA, recovery, and re-auth flows. Evaluate the full authentication path, including error handling and backup methods, not just the primary login form.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Make notifications accessible. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Use semantic table markup for screen readers. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。