本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

no-explicit-any

Use when reviewing TypeScript files for type safety regressions, during code review of functions that handle external data, or when the codebase has ESLint warnings for @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md2.2 KB
  • references/rule.md6.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Avoid the any type — use unknown, generics, or type guards instead

The any type is a local opt-out that becomes a global problem: a function returning any propagates unchecked types to every caller, silently undermining the type system across the entire codebase. Replacing any with unknown forces type narrowing at the point of use, turning latent runtime errors into compile-time failures where they are cheapest to fix.

Quick Reference

  • any disables all type checking for a value and cascades to callers
  • unknown is the safe alternative — it requires a type check before use
  • Use generics to express "I accept any type, but it stays consistent"
  • At API boundaries, validate with Zod rather than asserting with as Type

Check

Scan this TypeScript file for uses of the any type (explicit annotations, implicit any from missing types, and type assertions to any). Report each location and suggest a safer alternative.

Fix

Replace the any types in this code with unknown (for values of unknown shape), appropriate generics (for type-consistent operations), or Zod validation (for external data). Show the narrowing or generic constraint needed at each usage site.

Explain

Explain why the any type undermines TypeScript's guarantees, how unknown differs from any, and when a type assertion (as Type) is acceptable versus dangerous.

Code Review

Review all type annotations, function signatures, and external data handling in this file. Flag every explicit or implicit any, any type assertion that lacks a preceding type guard, and any return types inferred as any from untyped dependencies.


For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance, see references/rule.md.

Rule page: https://frontendchecklist.io/rules/javascript/no-explicit-any

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

404-page

無料

Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Create a custom 404 error page. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist7.4万2026年10月6日 更新

Use when auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability related to Create a dedicated About page. Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response rather than relying only on source files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist7.4万2026年10月6日 更新

Use when reviewing component libraries, page flows, or CI pipelines that need repeatable accessibility checks. Automated testing is strongest at catching structural and attribute-level issues; it does not replace keyboard, screen reader, and manual UX testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist7.4万2026年10月6日 更新

Use when reviewing sign-in, sign-up, MFA, CAPTCHA, recovery, and re-auth flows. Evaluate the full authentication path, including error handling and backup methods, not just the primary login form.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist7.4万2026年10月6日 更新

Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Make notifications accessible. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist7.4万2026年10月6日 更新

Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Use semantic table markup for screen readers. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist7.4万2026年10月6日 更新

thedaviddias のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する