404-page
無料Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Create a custom 404 error page. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing account settings pages, privacy dashboards, or API routes to verify that a complete data deletion path exists for users.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
GDPR Article 17 gives EU residents the right to have their personal data erased when it is no longer necessary for the purpose it was collected, or when they withdraw consent. Failing to honour this right can result in regulatory fines of up to €20 million or 4% of global annual turnover. Providing a clear deletion flow also builds trust with users who value control over their data.
Check whether this application provides a user-facing data deletion mechanism that clears all client-side storage and triggers a server-side deletion request.
Implement a data deletion flow that clears localStorage, sessionStorage, IndexedDB, and cookies, then sends a deletion request to the server and shows confirmation to the user.
Explain GDPR Article 17 (right to erasure) and what a compliant data deletion flow must cover, including both client-side and server-side data.
Review account settings, privacy pages, and API routes for a data deletion endpoint. Flag missing client-side storage clearance, absent confirmation UI, or missing server-side deletion calls.
For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance,
see references/rule.md.
Rule page: https://frontendchecklist.io/rules/privacy/right-to-erasure
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Create a custom 404 error page. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability related to Create a dedicated About page. Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response rather than relying only on source files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing component libraries, page flows, or CI pipelines that need repeatable accessibility checks. Automated testing is strongest at catching structural and attribute-level issues; it does not replace keyboard, screen reader, and manual UX testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing sign-in, sign-up, MFA, CAPTCHA, recovery, and re-auth flows. Evaluate the full authentication path, including error handling and backup methods, not just the primary login form.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing templates, rendered HTML, or shared components related to Make notifications accessible. Validate the final browser-facing markup, not just the source framework abstraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Use semantic table markup for screen readers. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。