本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

checkpoint-resume-long-job

Persist progress for long-running jobs (batched LLM calls, large ingestions, multi-hour syncs) so that a context reset, crash, or interrupt doesn't lose work. Use whenever a job iterates over N items and completing item K matters independently. Provides a resumable.mjs library pattern plus the skill's invocation heuristics.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md4.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Checkpoint & Resume for Long Jobs

Any job that takes longer than 5 minutes and iterates over N independent items should checkpoint its progress. Context can reset, processes can crash, users can Ctrl-C. A re-run shouldn't redo completed work.

Triggers

Activate when a job:

  • Iterates over ≥ 20 items AND each item takes ≥ 5 seconds, OR
  • Is expected to run ≥ 10 minutes total, OR
  • Calls external APIs with rate limits or cost per call (LLM, HTTP), OR
  • Is not naturally idempotent at the whole-job level

Shape

The simplest checkpoint is a file listing completed item IDs. On job start: read the file; on each item completion: append its ID; on job restart: skip any ID in the file.

Reference library: tools/checkpoint-resume/resumable.mjs

import { processBatches } from './tools/checkpoint-resume/resumable.mjs';

await processBatches({
  items: [...1713 lessons...],
  keyFn: l => l.id,
  checkpointFile: '.planning/sessions/tiebreaker-checkpoint.jsonl',
  batchSize: 5,
  async handler(batch) {
    // your per-batch work
    return batch.map(l => ({ id: l.id, status: 'done' }));
  },
  onProgress({ completed, total, skipped }) {
    console.error(`${completed + skipped}/${total} (${skipped} resumed)`);
  },
});

On first run, processes all items and appends IDs to the checkpoint file. On resume, reads the file and skips already-processed items.

Checkpoint Formats

FormatWhen
Append-only JSONLMost jobs. One line = one completed item. Easy to read, easy to resume.
Database columnWhen items already live in a DB — add processed_at TIMESTAMP and WHERE processed_at IS NULL at start.
Snapshot fileWhen checkpoint state is a complex structure (progress trees, partial outputs). Write a whole-state JSON every N items.

Prefer append-only JSONL. Crash-safe by design.

The Trade-off

Checkpointing adds file I/O per item. Usually negligible compared to the work itself. The cost of NOT checkpointing, however, is:

  • Wasted LLM calls (money)
  • Wasted API quota
  • User has to manually figure out where the job stopped
  • Worst case: job silently half-completes and corrupts DB state

Anti-patterns

  • Checkpointing to in-memory arrays only. If the process dies, so does the checkpoint.
  • Non-atomic writes. Use append-only (fsync-safe) or write-temp-then-rename.
  • Checkpoint file in /tmp. It WILL get cleaned up. Put it under .planning/sessions/ or a project-local cache dir.
  • Not logging the checkpoint file path at start. If the user needs to resume manually, they need to know where to look.

Invocation Heuristic

Before starting any long job, ask:

  • "If my process dies halfway, is the user's work gone?"
  • "If I'm Ctrl-C'd at item 500 of 1000, can I pick up at 501?"
  • "Does item K depend on item K-1, or are they independent?"

If answers are "yes, no, independent" → use checkpointing.

Example — LLM Tiebreaker (v1.49 release-history work)

Situation: 681 lessons to classify via claude -p, 5 per batch, ~30 sec per batch. Total: ~70 minutes. No checkpointing was in place.

Worst-case loss: 136 wasted LLM calls at batch 137 if context broke. Actual loss: 0 — but only because the run happened to complete first time.

Fix: wrap the batch loop in processBatches() from resumable.mjs. On resume, only unprocessed lessons get classified.

Related

  • session-observatory-live — log a checkpoint event at every completion
  • decision-framework-invoker — long jobs often produce irreversible state
  • batch-rewrite-pattern — similar batching shape, different domain

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Provides web accessibility best practices for semantic HTML, ARIA, keyboard navigation, color contrast, and screen reader patterns. Use when building UI components, reviewing accessibility, or when user mentions 'a11y', 'accessibility', 'ARIA', 'screen reader', 'keyboard navigation', 'WCAG'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tibsfox/gsd-skill-creator712026年7月20日 更新

Active listening techniques for effective communication. Covers attending behaviors, paraphrasing, reflective listening, clarifying questions, empathic response, barriers to listening, listening in conflict, and cross-cultural listening. Use when building listening skills, improving understanding in conversation, mediating disputes, or analyzing communication breakdowns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tibsfox/gsd-skill-creator712026年7月20日 更新

Adversarial spec-compliance PR review — cross-references diffs against approved specs, verifies runtime claims against source, detects competing PRs, audits scope/convention compliance. Use before merging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tibsfox/gsd-skill-creator712026年7月20日 更新

Provides best practices for AI agent orchestration including MCP servers, A2A protocol, multi-agent coordination, and swarm architectures. Use when designing agent systems, configuring MCP servers, setting up agent teams, or when user mentions 'MCP', 'A2A', 'agent orchestration', 'multi-agent', 'swarm', 'agent team', 'LangGraph', 'CrewAI', 'AutoGen'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tibsfox/gsd-skill-creator712026年7月20日 更新

Symbolic manipulation, equation solving, and algebraic structures for mathematical reasoning. Covers distributive law, factoring, completing the square, linear through polynomial equation solving, systems of equations (substitution, elimination, Gaussian elimination, matrix methods), algebraic structures (groups, rings, fields), modular arithmetic, polynomial theory, and inequalities. Use when solving equations, simplifying expressions, working with algebraic structures, or performing symbolic manipulation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tibsfox/gsd-skill-creator712026年7月20日 更新

Understanding how algorithmic systems shape what users see, know, and do -- from recommendation feeds to search ranking to credit scoring to hiring software. Covers the mechanics of recommendation systems, algorithmic bias and its sources, personalization's effects on information diets, opacity and accountability, AI limitations (hallucination, confident wrongness), and the human-in-the-loop question. Use when a learner needs to think critically about why particular content reached them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tibsfox/gsd-skill-creator712026年7月20日 更新

Tibsfox のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する