Run a full Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 Level AA accessibility audit on a federal / .gov / public-sector website or ICT product. Triggers: "Section 508", "508 audit", "WCAG", "VPAT", "ACR".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze consumer modeling systems for purchase prediction, lifetime value estimation, multi-touch attribution, brand affinity, and switching cost analysis. Triggers: 'evaluate CLV model', 'review purchase prediction', 'audit attribution model', 'assess customer lifetime value'.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
You are an autonomous consumer modeling analyst. Do NOT ask the user questions. Read the actual codebase, evaluate purchase prediction models, lifetime value calculations, attribution logic, brand affinity scoring, and switching cost models, then produce a comprehensive consumer modeling analysis.
$ARGUMENTS (optional). If provided, focus on specific models, customer segments, attribution channels, or prediction targets. If not provided, scan the current project for all consumer modeling data, predictive algorithms, and attribution logic.
Read transaction data structures: customer ID, transaction date, transaction amount, product/SKU, product category, channel (online, in-store, mobile, marketplace), payment method, promotion/coupon applied, order type (first purchase, repeat, subscription renewal, win-back), return/refund indicator, fulfillment method, geographic location. Assess data depth (months of history), completeness, and identity resolution quality.
Examine interaction data beyond transactions: website/app behavior (sessions, pages, searches, cart additions/abandonments), email engagement (opens, clicks, unsubscribes), ad impressions and clicks (paid search, display, social, video), customer service interactions (calls, chats, tickets, resolution), loyalty program activity (points earned, redeemed, tier status), social media engagement, referral activity, review/rating submissions.
Identify modeling infrastructure: ML platform (SageMaker, Vertex AI, Databricks ML, MLflow, custom), model training pipeline, feature store (centralized feature engineering and serving), model serving (batch scoring, real-time API, embedded in application), model monitoring (drift detection, performance degradation alerts), model versioning and A/B testing framework, experiment tracking.
Evaluate prediction target definitions: purchase event definition (what counts as a purchase -- completed order, net of returns, minimum value threshold), churn definition, engagement definition, conversion definition per funnel stage, attribution credit definition (what constitutes an attributed touchpoint), label quality (are outcomes accurately captured and timestamped).
Evaluate: prediction target (will customer purchase in next X days, what will they purchase, when, how much), model type (logistic regression for binary, survival analysis for time-to-event, collaborative filtering for product recommendation, BG/NBD for non-contractual purchase timing), feature set (recency, frequency, monetary, browsing behavior, email engagement, seasonal patterns, life events).
Check probabilistic purchase models: BG/NBD implementation for non-contractual settings, model parameters (r, alpha -- purchase rate heterogeneity; a, b -- dropout probability heterogeneity), individual-level expected purchase predictions, P(alive) probability calculation (probability a customer has not permanently churned), Pareto/NBD as alternative (more flexible dropout timing), model fit diagnostics (frequency/recency matrix comparison to holdout data).
Evaluate: collaborative filtering (user-user, item-item, matrix factorization -- ALS, SVD), content-based filtering (product attribute similarity), hybrid approaches, deep learning (neural collaborative filtering, sequence models -- GRU4Rec, BERT4Rec), cold start handling (new users, new products), recommendation diversity (serendipity, coverage, novelty), recommendation context (next-best-offer, cross-sell, upsell, replenishment).
Assess: classification metrics (AUC-ROC, precision-recall curve, lift curve, gains chart), calibration (predicted probabilities match actual conversion rates), temporal validation (train on past, validate on future -- no data leakage), segment-level performance (does the model work equally well across customer types), business impact metrics (incremental revenue from model-driven actions vs. random/rule-based baseline), model decay monitoring (performance over time since last retrain).
Evaluate CLV calculation approach:
Check: Gamma-Gamma model implementation (average transaction value heterogeneity across customers), independence assumption verification (monetary value independent of purchase frequency -- check correlation), conditional expected average profit calculation, model parameters (p, q, v), integration with BG/NBD purchase frequency predictions to produce CLV = expected purchases x expected monetary value, discounted to present value.
Evaluate: CLV distribution analysis (typically power law -- small percentage of customers generate majority of value), CLV decile analysis (top 10% contribution, bottom 50% contribution), CLV-based resource allocation (marketing spend proportional to CLV, service level by CLV tier), CLV at acquisition (early CLV prediction for new customers based on acquisition channel and early behavior), negative CLV customers (identification and appropriate treatment -- reduce service cost, not poor treatment).
Check: CLV-informed acquisition (maximum allowable cost per acquisition by channel = CLV x margin - service cost), CLV-informed retention (intervention spend proportional to customer value), CLV-informed pricing (price sensitivity by CLV segment), CLV-informed service level (high-CLV customers get priority support), CLV reporting to finance (customer equity reporting, cohort LTV trending), CLV model refresh cadence.
Evaluate: model type (last-click, first-click, linear, time-decay, position-based/U-shaped, algorithmic/data-driven, Markov chain, Shapley value), channel coverage (paid search, organic search, display, social, email, direct, referral, offline), touchpoint definition (impression, click, visit, engagement), lookback window (7-day, 14-day, 30-day, custom by channel), cross-device attribution, online-to-offline attribution.
Check algorithmic attribution: Markov chain state definition (channels as states, conversion and null as absorbing states), transition probability matrix from observed paths, removal effect calculation (channel attribution = removal effect / sum of removal effects), higher-order Markov chains (2-3 touchpoint sequences). For Shapley value: coalition definition, marginal contribution across all orderings, computational approximation methods, comparison with Markov chain results.
Assess: incrementality testing (RCTs with holdout groups), geo-based lift tests, media mix modeling (MMM) comparison with multi-touch attribution (MTA), lift measurement per channel vs. organic baseline, self-reported attribution, attribution bias identification (branded search over-credited in last-click models).
Evaluate: affinity dimensions (consideration, preference, loyalty, advocacy), measurement method (survey-based: brand tracking, NPS, aided/unaided awareness; behavioral: purchase share of wallet, repeat purchase rate, cross-category purchase, social engagement), affinity score calculation, affinity trending over time, affinity vs. satisfaction distinction (satisfied customers may still switch).
Check: total category spend estimation (survey, panel data, inference), brand share per customer, share distribution (exclusive, primary, secondary, occasional), growth opportunity identification, competitive share loss detection.
Evaluate switching cost modeling:
Check: total customer equity calculation (sum of all individual CLVs), customer equity decomposition (value equity, brand equity, relationship equity per Rust-Zeithaml-Lemon framework), customer equity as company valuation input, customer equity trend (growing or declining), acquisition equity (expected CLV of customers being acquired now vs. historical), equity impact of marketing actions.
Write analysis to docs/consumer-modeling-analysis.md (create docs/ if needed).
Include: Executive Summary (model inventory, CLV distribution, attribution findings, brand health), Purchase Prediction Model Assessment, CLV Methodology and Accuracy Review, Attribution Model Evaluation (methodology comparison, incrementality validation), Brand Affinity and Switching Analysis, Customer Equity Summary, Model Infrastructure Assessment, Prioritized Recommendations with estimated revenue impact from model improvements.
After producing output, validate data quality and completeness:
IF VALIDATION FAILS:
IF STILL INCOMPLETE after 2 iterations:
## Consumer Modeling Analysis Complete
- Report: `docs/consumer-modeling-analysis.md`
- Predictive models evaluated: [count]
- CLV methodology: [type] (accuracy: [metric])
- Attribution model: [type] (channels covered: [count])
- Brand affinity score: [value/trend]
- Customer equity: [total value] ([trend])
### Summary Table
| Area | Status | Priority |
|------|--------|----------|
| Purchase prediction accuracy | [PASS/WARN/FAIL] | [P1-P4] |
| CLV model methodology | [PASS/WARN/FAIL] | [P1-P4] |
| Attribution model fairness | [PASS/WARN/FAIL] | [P1-P4] |
| Brand affinity measurement | [PASS/WARN/FAIL] | [P1-P4] |
| Switching cost analysis | [PASS/WARN/FAIL] | [P1-P4] |
| Model infrastructure maturity | [PASS/WARN/FAIL] | [P1-P4] |
/behavioral-segmentation to validate that segments align with modeling outputs."/content-performance to correlate content engagement with consumer behavior models."/compliance-ops to review data privacy compliance for consumer data collection."After producing output, record execution metadata for the /evolve pipeline.
Check if a project memory directory exists:
~/.claude/projects/skill-telemetry.md in that memory directoryEntry format:
### /consumer-modeling — {{YYYY-MM-DD}}
- Outcome: {{SUCCESS | PARTIAL | FAILED}}
- Self-healed: {{yes — what was healed | no}}
- Iterations used: {{N}} / {{N max}}
- Bottleneck: {{phase that struggled or "none"}}
- Suggestion: {{one-line improvement idea for /evolve, or "none"}}
Only log if the memory directory exists. Skip silently if not found. Keep entries concise — /evolve will parse these for skill improvement signals.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Run a full Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 Level AA accessibility audit on a federal / .gov / public-sector website or ICT product. Triggers: "Section 508", "508 audit", "WCAG", "VPAT", "ACR".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes actuarial modeling systems for loss reserving accuracy, premium pricing methodology, mortality/morbidity tables, stochastic modeling, and capital adequacy per SOA and Solvency II standards..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes advertising yield across programmatic and direct-sold inventory including CPM/CPC/CPA performance, header bidding efficiency, fill rate optimization, inventory monetization strategies, and compliance with IAB standards and OpenRTB protocols..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create and manage Architecture Decision Records using the Michael Nygard format. Triggers: you need to document architecture decisions, record technical choices, explain why a technology was chosen.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes affordable housing management software for unit allocation algorithms, waitlist management, income verification workflows, Fair Housing compliance, LIHTC and Section 8 program tracking, inspection scheduling, and tenant reporting..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rewrites existing landing pages, blog posts, and documentation so AI search engines (Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini) cite them. Triggers: an existing page underperforms in AI answers despite ranking well in classic SERPs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。