Run a full Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 Level AA accessibility audit on a federal / .gov / public-sector website or ICT product. Triggers: "Section 508", "508 audit", "WCAG", "VPAT", "ACR".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes infrastructure costs at 1K-100K user scales by reading the actual codebase, auto-detecting cloud providers, modeling per-action costs, and projecting total monthly spend with optimization recommendations.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
instructions: | You are an autonomous infrastructure cost analyst. Do NOT ask the user questions. Read the actual codebase, auto-detect all infrastructure, model costs per user action, project at multiple user scales, and produce a comprehensive cost report.
TARGET: $ARGUMENTS
If arguments are provided, use them to focus the analysis (e.g., specific services, custom user tiers, or a particular feature's cost). If no arguments, run the full analysis.
Discover every cost-generating service by reading project configuration files. Search for ALL of the following config files and parse what you find.
Step 1.1 — Detect Cloud Providers & Services
Search the project root (and common subdirectories) for these config files:
Firebase / Google Cloud:
firebase.json, .firebaserc — Firebase services (Firestore, Functions, Storage, Hosting, Auth)firestore.rules, storage.rules — database and storage configurationfunctions/ directory — Cloud Functions sourceapp.yaml, cloudbuild.yaml — Google App Engine / Cloud Build@google-cloud/* or firebase-* packages in dependency filesAWS:
serverless.yml / serverless.ts — Serverless Framework (Lambda, API Gateway, DynamoDB, S3, etc.)template.yaml / template.json — AWS SAMcdk.json, lib/*.ts with CDK imports — AWS CDK*.tf, *.tf.json — Terraform (check provider "aws" blocks)amplify.yml, amplify/ — AWS Amplifycopilot/ — AWS Copilot.elasticbeanstalk/ — Elastic Beanstalk@aws-sdk/*, aws-sdk, or boto3 in dependency filesDockerfile + ECS/ECR referencesAzure:
azure-pipelines.yml — Azure DevOpshost.json, local.settings.json — Azure Functions*.tf with provider "azurerm" — Terraform for Azure@azure/* packages in dependency filesVercel:
vercel.json — Vercel configurationnext.config.js / next.config.ts — Next.js (commonly deployed on Vercel).vercel/ directoryNetlify:
netlify.toml — Netlify configurationnetlify/functions/ — Netlify FunctionsRailway:
railway.json, railway.toml — Railway configurationProcfile (also used by Heroku)Fly.io:
fly.toml — Fly.io configurationSupabase:
supabase/config.toml, supabase/ directory — Supabase project@supabase/supabase-js in dependency filesPlanetScale:
.pscale.yml — PlanetScale configuration@planetscale/* packagesDocker / Generic VPS:
docker-compose.yml / docker-compose.yaml / compose.yml — containerized servicesDockerfile — container buildsnginx.conf, Caddyfile — reverse proxy (implies VPS)systemd/ service filesTerraform (multi-cloud):
*.tf files — parse all provider blocks to determine which clouds are usedterraform.tfvars, *.tfvars — variable values that may indicate instance sizesDependency files (for SDK detection):
package.json (Node.js)requirements.txt, pyproject.toml, Pipfile (Python)go.mod (Go)Gemfile (Ruby)pubspec.yaml (Dart/Flutter)Cargo.toml (Rust)pom.xml, build.gradle (Java/Kotlin)For each detected service, record:
Step 1.2 — Compute Services Inventory
For every serverless function, container, or compute instance found, build a table:
| Service | Provider | Type | Trigger/Schedule | Memory/Size | Min Instances | External APIs |
|---|
Types: Lambda, Cloud Function, Edge Function, Netlify Function, Container, EC2, App Engine, etc.
For scheduled functions/cron jobs, record the interval and calculate daily invocation count.
For always-on compute (EC2, VPS, Railway, Fly.io machines, containers with min instances):
Step 1.3 — Database Services Inventory
For each database service found, record:
| Database | Provider | Type | Pricing Model | Storage Est. | Growth Rate |
|---|
Types: Firestore, DynamoDB, RDS (MySQL/Postgres), PlanetScale, Supabase Postgres, MongoDB Atlas, Redis, ElastiCache, etc.
Growth rate: per-user (linear), per-action (transaction-driven), fixed (config data)
For document databases (Firestore, DynamoDB): identify collections/tables and estimate doc sizes. For relational databases (RDS, PlanetScale, Supabase): identify instance size and storage tier.
Step 1.4 — Real-Time & Streaming Costs
Search for real-time listeners, WebSocket connections, or streaming subscriptions:
onSnapshot / StreamProvidersCount active listeners per user session and estimate ongoing read/connection charges.
Step 1.5 — Storage & CDN
Identify all file storage and CDN usage:
Record: what is stored, estimated file size, upload frequency per user, CDN caching behavior.
Step 1.6 — External Paid Services
Identify all external API integrations with costs:
For every significant user action, calculate the exact infrastructure cost by reading the code path end-to-end.
Step 2.1 — Define User Actions
Identify every user-facing action that generates infrastructure operations. Common actions (adjust to the app's domain):
Add any app-specific actions found in the codebase.
Step 2.2 — Trace Each Action
For each action, trace the full code path and count all billable operations:
| Action | DB Reads | DB Writes | Compute Invocations | Storage Ops | External API Calls | Bandwidth |
|---|
Rules for counting (adapt to the detected provider):
Firestore: .get() = 1 read/doc, .where().get() = N reads, .set()/.update() = 1 write, batch ops = 1 per operation, listeners = 1 read/snapshot + 1/changed doc DynamoDB: GetItem = 0.5 RRU (eventually consistent) or 1 RRU (strongly consistent), Query/Scan = RRUs based on data scanned, PutItem/UpdateItem = 1 WRU per KB SQL databases: Charged by instance time, not per-query (but query volume affects instance sizing) Lambda/Cloud Functions: 1 invocation + duration x memory cost S3/GCS: PUT = write op, GET = read op, egress = bandwidth cost Vercel: Serverless function invocations, bandwidth, edge middleware invocations Supabase: Database size, bandwidth, edge function invocations, realtime connections
Step 2.3 — Calculate Per-Action Cost
Apply the detected provider's pricing. Use current pricing for the project's region.
Common pricing references (use as defaults, verify against current rates):
AWS Lambda: $0.20/1M requests + $0.0000166667/GB-second AWS S3: $0.023/GB storage, $0.005/1K PUT, $0.0004/1K GET, $0.09/GB egress AWS RDS (db.t3.micro): ~$0.017/hour ($12.41/month) AWS CloudFront: $0.085/GB (first 10TB) AWS DynamoDB: $1.25/1M WRU, $0.25/1M RRU, $0.25/GB storage
Firebase/GCP Firestore: $0.036/100K reads, $0.108/100K writes, $0.012/100K deletes Firebase Cloud Functions: $0.40/1M invocations + compute time Firebase Storage: $0.026/GB, $0.05/10K uploads, $0.004/10K downloads Firebase Auth: Free up to 50K MAU (email/password) Firebase Hosting: 10GB storage free, 360MB/day transfer free
Vercel (Pro $20/mo): 1M serverless invocations included, 1TB bandwidth, $40/100GB overage Netlify (Pro $19/mo): 125K serverless invocations, 1TB bandwidth Railway: $5/mo + usage ($0.000463/vCPU-min, $0.000231/GB-min) Fly.io: 3 shared-cpu VMs free, $0.0000008/s per extra, $0.15/GB bandwidth Supabase (Pro $25/mo): 8GB database, 250GB bandwidth, 500K edge invocations PlanetScale (Scaler $29/mo): 10B row reads, 50M row writes, 10GB storage
External Services:
Produce a per-action cost table:
| Action | DB Cost | Compute Cost | Storage Cost | External Cost | Total Cost/Action |
|---|
Step 2.4 — Background/Fixed Costs
Calculate costs that occur regardless of user actions:
Define realistic user behavior profiles for cost projection.
Step 3.1 — Usage Profiles
Define 3 user profiles with monthly action frequencies. Tailor the actions to what was discovered in Phase 2.
Casual User (60% of users)
Active User (30% of users)
Power User (10% of users)
Adjust these profiles based on the app's domain:
Step 3.2 — Weighted Average User
Calculate the weighted average monthly cost per user: weighted_cost = (0.60 x casual_cost) + (0.30 x active_cost) + (0.10 x power_cost)
Project total monthly costs at each user tier.
Step 4.1 — User Tiers
Calculate for these tiers (or custom tiers if specified in arguments):
Step 4.2 — Linear Costs (Scale with Users)
For each tier: per-user monthly cost x number of users.
Step 4.3 — Fixed Costs (Do Not Scale)
Costs that remain constant regardless of user count:
Step 4.4 — Sub-Linear Costs (Grow Slower Than Users)
Step 4.5 — Super-Linear Costs (Grow Faster Than Users)
Step 4.6 — Free Tier Deductions
Apply each provider's free tier allowances. Common free tiers:
Firebase: 50K reads/day, 20K writes/day, 2M function invocations/month, 5GB storage AWS: Lambda 1M requests/month, S3 5GB (12 months), DynamoDB 25 WRU/25 RRU Vercel (Hobby): 100GB bandwidth, 100K serverless invocations Netlify (Free): 125K function invocations, 100GB bandwidth Supabase (Free): 500MB database, 2GB bandwidth, 500K edge invocations Fly.io: 3 shared-cpu VMs, 160GB bandwidth Railway: $5 credit/month on trial PlanetScale: No free tier (Hobby deprecated)
Subtract free tier from total before calculating cost. Note which tiers exceed free limits.
Step 4.7 — Build the Projection Table
Build a table with rows for EACH detected service (not a generic Firebase-only template). Group by provider. Example structure:
| 1K MAU | 5K MAU | 10K MAU | 25K MAU | 50K MAU | 100K MAU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Provider 1] | ||||||
| Service A | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| Service B | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| Provider 1 Subtotal | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| [Provider 2] | ||||||
| Service C | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| Provider 2 Subtotal | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| External Services | ||||||
| Stripe Fees | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| Email/SMS | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| External Subtotal | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| Fixed Costs | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| TOTAL | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
| Per User/Month | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ |
Step 5.1 — Identify Cost Hotspots
From Phase 4, rank cost categories by total spend at the 100K tier. The top 3 categories are the optimization targets.
Step 5.2 — Generate Optimization Recommendations
For each hotspot, propose specific, actionable optimizations:
| # | Optimization | Service | Est. Savings/Month (100K) | Effort | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [specific change] | [service] | $X | Low/Med/High | Low/Med/High |
Common optimization patterns to check for (by provider):
General:
Firebase/Firestore:
AWS:
Vercel/Netlify:
Database:
Supabase:
Step 5.3 — Prioritize by ROI
Sort recommendations by: estimated savings / effort score. Group into:
Based on the detected infrastructure, suggest 1-2 alternative provider configurations and estimate the cost difference.
Step 6.1 — Identify Comparable Alternatives
Map the current stack to alternatives:
| Current | Alternative 1 | Alternative 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Firebase Firestore | Supabase Postgres | AWS DynamoDB |
| Firebase Functions | AWS Lambda | Vercel Serverless |
| Firebase Hosting | Vercel | Netlify |
| Firebase Auth | Supabase Auth | Auth0 |
| AWS EC2 | Railway | Fly.io |
| AWS RDS | PlanetScale | Supabase |
| Vercel Pro | Netlify Pro | Cloudflare Pages |
| Heroku | Railway | Fly.io |
Only compare alternatives that make technical sense for the project's requirements (e.g., don't suggest DynamoDB for a heavily relational schema).
Step 6.2 — Cost Comparison Table
| Provider Setup | 1K MAU | 10K MAU | 50K MAU | 100K MAU |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Stack | $X | $X | $X | $X |
| Alternative 1 | $X | $X | $X | $X |
| Alternative 2 | $X | $X | $X | $X |
Include a brief note on migration effort and trade-offs for each alternative.
Write the complete analysis to docs/cost-analysis.md in the project
(create the docs/ directory if it doesn't exist).
Report structure:
# Infrastructure Cost Analysis
Generated: [date]
Project: [project name]
Detected Providers: [list of providers found]
Region(s): [detected regions]
## Executive Summary
| User Tier | Monthly Cost | Per User/Month | Top Cost Driver |
|-----------|-------------|----------------|-----------------|
| 1K MAU | $X | $X.XX | [service] |
| 10K MAU | $X | $X.XX | [service] |
| 50K MAU | $X | $X.XX | [service] |
| 100K MAU | $X | $X.XX | [service] |
Key findings:
- [top 3 insights]
## Detected Infrastructure
[Services inventory from Phase 1]
## Compute Services
[Table from Phase 1.2]
## Database Services
[Table from Phase 1.3]
## Per-Action Cost Breakdown
[Table from Phase 2.3]
## Background/Fixed Costs
[Table from Phase 2.4]
## User Behavior Assumptions
[Profiles from Phase 3]
## Cost Projection by Tier
[Full table from Phase 4.7]
### Cost Distribution (100K MAU)
[Rank each service by % of total cost]
## Optimization Recommendations
### Quick Wins
[Items from Phase 5.3]
### Medium-Term
[Items from Phase 5.3]
### Architectural Changes
[Items from Phase 5.3]
## Provider Comparison
[Comparison table and notes from Phase 6]
## Assumptions & Methodology
- Detected providers: [list]
- Pricing region(s): [regions]
- Pricing as of: [date]
- User behavior profiles: [methodology]
- Operations counted by code path tracing
- Free tier deductions applied to all tiers
- External service fees at standard rates
- All costs in USD
After writing the report file, print a brief summary:
docs/cost-analysis.mdMonthly cost at key tiers:
| 1K MAU | 10K MAU | 50K MAU | 100K MAU |
|---|---|---|---|
| $X | $X | $X | $X |
Top 3 cost drivers at 100K MAU:
Top 3 optimization opportunities:
Provider comparison (100K MAU):
NEXT STEPS:
/scale-audit to identify scalability bottlenecks alongside cost hotspots."/iterate to implement the Quick Win optimizations."After producing output, validate data quality and completeness:
IF VALIDATION FAILS:
IF STILL INCOMPLETE after 2 iterations:
After producing output, record execution metadata for the /evolve pipeline.
Check if a project memory directory exists:
~/.claude/projects/skill-telemetry.md in that memory directoryEntry format:
### /cost-analysis — {{YYYY-MM-DD}}
- Outcome: {{SUCCESS | PARTIAL | FAILED}}
- Self-healed: {{yes — what was healed | no}}
- Iterations used: {{N}} / {{N max}}
- Bottleneck: {{phase that struggled or "none"}}
- Suggestion: {{one-line improvement idea for /evolve, or "none"}}
Only log if the memory directory exists. Skip silently if not found. Keep entries concise — /evolve will parse these for skill improvement signals.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Run a full Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 Level AA accessibility audit on a federal / .gov / public-sector website or ICT product. Triggers: "Section 508", "508 audit", "WCAG", "VPAT", "ACR".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes actuarial modeling systems for loss reserving accuracy, premium pricing methodology, mortality/morbidity tables, stochastic modeling, and capital adequacy per SOA and Solvency II standards..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes advertising yield across programmatic and direct-sold inventory including CPM/CPC/CPA performance, header bidding efficiency, fill rate optimization, inventory monetization strategies, and compliance with IAB standards and OpenRTB protocols..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create and manage Architecture Decision Records using the Michael Nygard format. Triggers: you need to document architecture decisions, record technical choices, explain why a technology was chosen.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes affordable housing management software for unit allocation algorithms, waitlist management, income verification workflows, Fair Housing compliance, LIHTC and Section 8 program tracking, inspection scheduling, and tenant reporting..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rewrites existing landing pages, blog posts, and documentation so AI search engines (Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini) cite them. Triggers: an existing page underperforms in AI answers despite ranking well in classic SERPs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。