本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

cre-underwriting

Generate an institutional-grade commercial real estate underwriting model — input schema (T-12 income, T-3 trailing, rent roll, debt terms, exit assumptions), calc engine (Cap Rate, NOI, Cash-on-Cash, IRR, DSCR, Debt Yield, ROI, Equity Multiple, levered & unlevered returns).

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md12.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Commercial Real Estate Underwriting Generator

You generate a complete institutional-grade CRE underwriting model. Output is real code (Python with openpyxl for Excel output) plus the Excel workbook itself plus a markdown investment memo — not a static spreadsheet template.

The pain you solve: CBRE 2025 research found 62% of CRE acquisitions analysts spend most of their time on data entry — copying numbers from Offering Memorandums into Excel. Cap rate validation alone takes ~3 hours per deal. This skill generates the model AND the data-extraction scaffold so the underwriter spends time on judgment, not typing.

============================================================ === PRE-FLIGHT ===

Gather and verify before generating:

  • Asset type identified. The model differs significantly:
    • Multifamily — unit mix, in-place vs market rent, T-12 with rent roll, loss-to-lease, vacancy, concessions
    • Office — rent roll with WALT, TI/LC reserves, vacancy assumption from CoStar comps
    • Retail — anchor vs in-line tenants, % rent clauses, CAM recoveries
    • Industrial — flat NNN structure, expansion options, build-to-suit credit
    • Hospitality — RevPAR / ADR / Occupancy, FF&E reserve
    • Self-storage — economic vs physical occupancy, ECRI cadence
    • Mixed-use — segmented proforma per use type, combined exit
  • Capital stack assumption. All-cash, single mortgage, A/B note, mezz, preferred equity — drives Phase 4 (Waterfall).
  • Output format. Excel workbook (openpyxl), Python module with API, OR both (recommend both — Python for repeatability, Excel for LP delivery).
  • Inputs available. OM PDF? Rent roll CSV? T-12 spreadsheet? Loan term sheet? If only narrative description, generate with sample values clearly marked as placeholder.

Recovery:

  • If asset type unclear, default to multifamily (the most common deal type — 40%+ of US CRE transaction volume).
  • If inputs are PDFs/photos, scaffold an extraction module using pdfplumber + a structured prompt to extract rent roll line items — but mark the extraction stage as REQUIRES_REVIEW.

============================================================ === PHASE 1: INPUT SCHEMA ===

Generate inputs.py defining the deal inputs as a strict Pydantic schema. Fields by section:

Property

  • name, address, asset_type, year_built, year_renovated, sq_ft (NRA), unit_count, parking_count, submarket

Acquisition

  • purchase_price, closing_costs_pct (default 1.5%), due_diligence_costs, financing_costs, capex_at_close, working_capital, total_basis (derived)

Income (T-12 actual + Y1 underwritten)

  • gross_potential_rent, vacancy_pct (physical), credit_loss_pct, concessions, other_income (parking, fees, RUBS, laundry), effective_gross_income (derived)

Operating Expenses (Y1 underwritten)

  • real_estate_taxes (post-reassessment if relevant), insurance, utilities, repairs_maintenance, marketing, payroll, mgmt_fee_pct, replacement_reserves_per_unit, total_opex (derived), expense_ratio (derived)

Net Operating Income (derived: EGI − OpEx)

Debt

  • ltv_pct OR loan_amount (mutually exclusive), interest_rate, amortization_years, term_years, io_period_years (default 0), origination_fee_pct, dscr_required_min (default 1.20x), debt_yield_required_min (default 8.0%)

Exit

  • hold_period_years (default 5 or 7), exit_cap_rate (typically +25-75 bps over entry cap), cost_of_sale_pct (default 2.0%), terminal_value (derived)

Growth Assumptions (10-year vectors)

  • rent_growth_pct[], expense_growth_pct[], other_income_growth_pct[]

Partnership (if syndication)

  • gp_co_invest_pct, lp_pref_rate (default 8.0%), promote_tiers (e.g., 70/30 to 8% IRR, 60/40 to 15%, 50/50 above)

VALIDATION: Schema validates against a sample multifamily deal (10-unit, $1.5M purchase) without errors. All derived fields recompute correctly from primary fields.

FALLBACK: If user has a custom field, add via extra_fields: dict rather than hardcoding.

============================================================ === PHASE 2: CORE CALCULATION ENGINE ===

Generate calc.py with these formulas (cite each so the user can audit):

# Cap Rate = NOI / Purchase Price
#   Source: Appraisal Institute, "The Appraisal of Real Estate" 15th ed.

# Cash-on-Cash = (NOI - Debt Service) / Total Equity Invested
#   Year 1; should be > LP pref to make sense for value-add deals

# DSCR = NOI / Annual Debt Service
#   Lender minimum typically 1.20x-1.25x (multifamily), 1.30x+ (other)

# Debt Yield = NOI / Loan Amount
#   Lender minimum typically 7.5-9% — cap-rate-independent stress test

# Loan Constant = Annual Debt Service / Loan Amount
#   For amortizing loan: use PMT formula

# Annual Debt Service:
#   IO period: loan_amount * interest_rate
#   Amortizing: numpy_financial.pmt(rate/12, am_months, -loan) * 12

# Unlevered IRR: numpy_financial.irr([- total_basis, ncf_yr1, ..., ncf_yrN + sale_proceeds])
# Levered IRR:   numpy_financial.irr([- total_equity, cfat_yr1, ..., cfat_yrN + net_sale_to_equity])

# Equity Multiple = Sum(Distributions to Equity) / Total Equity Invested

# Terminal Value = Year_N+1_NOI / Exit Cap Rate
# Net Sale Proceeds = Terminal Value - Cost of Sale - Loan Balance at Exit

The engine MUST:

  • Use numpy_financial for IRR/PMT/NPV (NOT the pure-numpy versions — they're deprecated).
  • Compute LEVERED and UNLEVERED separately. Many junior models conflate these.
  • Compute YEAR-1 stabilized AND T-12 actual AND stabilized AT EXIT NOI. The cap rate at sale uses Year_N+1 NOI, not Year_N.
  • Handle a value-add scenario where NOI grows non-linearly (e.g., rent bumps after renovation).
  • Compute breakeven occupancy: Breakeven_Occ = (OpEx + Debt Service) / GPR.
  • Compute debt sizing test: if loan_amount is None, size to MIN(LTV constraint, DSCR constraint, Debt Yield constraint).

VALIDATION: Run engine against the textbook example (50 units, $7.5M purchase, 6% cap, 65% LTV, 5.5% interest 30am IO 24, 7-year hold, exit at 6.5% cap) and confirm Levered IRR matches the worked example within 10 bps.

============================================================ === PHASE 3: 10-YEAR PROFORMA ===

Generate the full 10-year cash flow waterfall:

LineYear 1Year 2...Year N (exit)
Gross Potential Rent1.20Mgrown
(-) Vacancy(60K)
(-) Concessions(10K)
(+) Other Income80K
Effective Gross Income1.21M
(-) Operating Expenses(480K)
Net Operating Income730K
(-) Capital Reserves(15K)
NOI after Reserves715K
(-) Debt Service(450K)
Cash Flow After Debt265K
(+) Sale Proceeds net of debt+ 5.2M
Cash Flow to Equity265K5.46M

Plus a Sources & Uses table at acquisition and a Sources & Uses at exit.

VALIDATION: Row totals reconcile (EGI − OpEx = NOI). Year N+1 NOI used for exit valuation, not Year N.

============================================================ === PHASE 4: WATERFALL (for syndication deals) ===

If GP/LP partnership is configured, generate the waterfall.

Standard CRE waterfall (American or European — default European, which is simpler and LP-friendly):

Tier 1: Return of Capital — 100% to LP until LP has received back original equity
Tier 2: Preferred Return — 100% to LP until LP IRR = preferred rate (typically 8%)
Tier 3: First Promote — 70/30 (LP/GP) until LP IRR = 12% (or configured threshold)
Tier 4: Second Promote — 60/40 until LP IRR = 18%
Tier 5: Final Promote — 50/50 above

Output per LP and per GP:

  • Equity invested, distributions received, levered IRR, equity multiple, % of total profit

VALIDATION: Sum of (LP + GP) distributions = total distributable cash flow. GP carry only kicks in after LP IRR hurdle met.

FALLBACK: If single-investor deal, skip this phase entirely.

============================================================ === PHASE 5: SENSITIVITY TABLES ===

Generate three 2D sensitivities (the deal-killers):

  1. Exit Cap × Rent Growth → Levered IRR
  2. Entry Cap × Loan Constant → Cash-on-Cash Year 1
  3. Vacancy × OpEx Growth → DSCR Year 1

Each output as both a pandas DataFrame heatmap AND an Excel sheet with conditional formatting.

VALIDATION: Center cell of each sensitivity equals the base-case output.

============================================================ === PHASE 6: INVESTMENT MEMO ===

Generate memo.md (markdown) with these sections:

  1. Executive Summary (3 sentences: asset, basis per unit, headline returns)
  2. Returns Summary Table (Y1 cap, stabilized cap, Y1 CoC, levered IRR, equity multiple, DSCR Y1)
  3. Sources & Uses at acquisition
  4. Capital Stack diagram (text-based)
  5. Underwriting Assumptions Highlights (rent growth, expense growth, exit cap)
  6. Sensitivity Summary (best case / base case / downside)
  7. Risks & Mitigants (3-5 items, populated from heuristics: high LTV → refi risk; aggressive rent growth → stabilization risk; etc.)
  8. Recommendation (with a clearly-marked placeholder for the underwriter — model doesn't recommend, it presents)

VALIDATION: Memo renders without dangling markdown. All numbers tie to the proforma.

FALLBACK: If user wants PDF, add a step to convert via pandoc or weasyprint.

============================================================ === SELF-REVIEW ===

Score 1–5:

  • Complete: All 6 phases present? Both levered and unlevered IRR computed? Waterfall if applicable?
  • Robust: Handles divide-by-zero (cap rate when NOI < 0), partial first year, IO period, value-add NOI ramp?
  • Clean: Excel output formatted with proper number formats ($, %, x for multipliers)? Tabs labeled? Print-area set?
  • CRE-credible: Would a CRE acquisitions associate at JLL/CBRE/Cushman recognize the conventions and the formulas? (Killer dimension — wrong cap rate calculation = no trust ever.)

If any < 4:

  • Most common gap: using current-year NOI instead of forward-year NOI for the exit valuation. Fix and re-run sensitivity.

============================================================ === LEARNINGS CAPTURE ===

Append to ~/.claude/skills/cre-underwriting/LEARNINGS.md:

<YYYY-MM-DD> — <asset type, deal size, capital stack>

  • What worked: <pattern that produced clean output>
  • What was awkward: <retry or manual fix needed>
  • Suggested patch: <concrete improvement>
  • Verdict: [Smooth / Minor friction / Major friction]

============================================================ === STRICT RULES ===

  • Never use Year_N NOI for exit valuation. Always Year_N+1 NOI / exit cap.
  • Never confuse levered and unlevered IRR. Both ship; both labeled.
  • Never use deprecated numpy.irr. Use numpy_financial.irr.
  • Never hardcode market rents — they come from the user's rent roll or comp set.
  • Never imply the model gives a buy/sell recommendation. It presents math; humans decide.
  • If the user has ARGUS, generate an export-to-ARGUS schema rather than a competing model.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

508-audit

無料

Run a full Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 Level AA accessibility audit on a federal / .gov / public-sector website or ICT product. Triggers: "Section 508", "508 audit", "WCAG", "VPAT", "ACR".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tinh2/skills-hub-registry192026年9月5日 更新

Analyzes actuarial modeling systems for loss reserving accuracy, premium pricing methodology, mortality/morbidity tables, stochastic modeling, and capital adequacy per SOA and Solvency II standards..

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tinh2/skills-hub-registry192026年9月5日 更新

Analyzes advertising yield across programmatic and direct-sold inventory including CPM/CPC/CPA performance, header bidding efficiency, fill rate optimization, inventory monetization strategies, and compliance with IAB standards and OpenRTB protocols..

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tinh2/skills-hub-registry192026年9月5日 更新

adr

無料

Create and manage Architecture Decision Records using the Michael Nygard format. Triggers: you need to document architecture decisions, record technical choices, explain why a technology was chosen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tinh2/skills-hub-registry192026年9月5日 更新

Analyzes affordable housing management software for unit allocation algorithms, waitlist management, income verification workflows, Fair Housing compliance, LIHTC and Section 8 program tracking, inspection scheduling, and tenant reporting..

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tinh2/skills-hub-registry192026年9月5日 更新

Rewrites existing landing pages, blog posts, and documentation so AI search engines (Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini) cite them. Triggers: an existing page underperforms in AI answers despite ranking well in classic SERPs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tinh2/skills-hub-registry192026年9月5日 更新

tinh2 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する