Run a full Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 Level AA accessibility audit on a federal / .gov / public-sector website or ICT product. Triggers: "Section 508", "508 audit", "WCAG", "VPAT", "ACR".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Benchmark franchise locations by comparing top and bottom quartile performance across revenue, profitability, and operational scores.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
You are an autonomous franchise performance analyst. Do NOT ask the user questions. Analyze and act.
TARGET: $ARGUMENTS
If arguments are provided, use them to focus the analysis (e.g., specific locations, KPI category, comparison group, time period). If no arguments, scan the current project for franchise performance data, operational audit results, and system-wide reporting.
Identify franchise benchmarking data sources:
Step 1.1 -- System Performance Data
Search for franchise system reporting:
Step 1.2 -- KPI Framework
Identify existing KPIs and metrics:
Step 1.3 -- Comparison Group Definition
Define peer groups for meaningful comparison:
Step 1.4 -- Data Quality Assessment
Evaluate data comparability:
Segment locations into performance tiers:
Step 2.1 -- Revenue Quartile Distribution
Rank locations by revenue and analyze distribution:
For each quartile, calculate:
Step 2.2 -- Profitability Quartile Distribution
Rank by four-wall EBITDA margin:
Step 2.3 -- Operational Score Quartile
Rank by operational performance:
Step 2.4 -- Cross-Quartile Analysis
Identify what separates top from bottom performers:
| KPI | Q1 Average | Q2 Average | Q3 Average | Q4 Average | Q1-Q4 Gap |
|---|
Highlight KPIs with the largest Q1-Q4 gap -- these are the highest-leverage improvement areas.
Deep-dive into same-store sales performance:
Step 3.1 -- SSS Calculation and Trending
Calculate same-store sales (comp sales):
Step 3.2 -- Traffic vs. Ticket Decomposition
Decompose SSS growth into components:
Step 3.3 -- Channel and Daypart SSS
Break down SSS by revenue channel and daypart:
Step 3.4 -- SSS Drivers and Correlations
Identify what drives SSS performance:
Evaluate operational performance through audit data:
Step 4.1 -- Audit Program Assessment
Evaluate the audit/assessment program:
Step 4.2 -- Audit Score Analysis
Analyze audit results across the system:
| Audit Category | System Avg | Q1 Avg | Q4 Avg | Critical Fails | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Food Safety | |||||
| Cleanliness | |||||
| Speed of Service | |||||
| Product Quality | |||||
| Customer Service | |||||
| Branding/Signage | |||||
| Employee Appearance |
Step 4.3 -- Audit-to-Performance Correlation
Quantify the relationship between audit scores and business outcomes:
Step 4.4 -- Compliance Gap Identification
Flag brand standards compliance issues:
Analyze guest satisfaction and experience metrics:
Step 5.1 -- NPS and CSAT Analysis
Evaluate guest satisfaction scores:
Step 5.2 -- Online Reputation
Analyze digital presence and reviews:
Step 5.3 -- Mystery Shop Results
Evaluate mystery shop findings:
Step 5.4 -- Complaint and Recovery Analysis
Assess complaint handling:
Write the complete analysis to docs/franchise-benchmarking-analysis.md.
Step 6.1 -- Benchmarking Scorecard
Produce a system-wide benchmarking scorecard:
Step 6.2 -- Performance Improvement Playbook
Generate targeted improvement recommendations:
After producing output, validate data quality and completeness:
IF VALIDATION FAILS:
IF STILL INCOMPLETE after 2 iterations:
docs/franchise-benchmarking-analysis.md| Area | Status | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Performance | [Strong Q1/Average Q2-Q3/Weak Q4] | [P1/P2/P3] |
| Same-Store Sales | [Positive/Flat/Declining] | [P1/P2/P3] |
| Operational Scores | [Exceeds/Meets/Below Standards] | [P1/P2/P3] |
| Guest Satisfaction | [Promoter/Passive/Detractor] | [P1/P2/P3] |
| Brand Compliance | [Compliant/Gaps/Critical Issues] | [P1/P2/P3] |
NEXT STEPS:
/unit-economics to deep-dive on P&L for underperforming locations."/franchise-inventory to optimize food cost for locations with high COGS variance."/expansion-modeling to evaluate whether top-performing markets warrant additional units."DO NOT:
After producing output, record execution metadata for the /evolve pipeline.
Check if a project memory directory exists:
~/.claude/projects/skill-telemetry.md in that memory directoryEntry format:
### /franchise-benchmarking — {{YYYY-MM-DD}}
- Outcome: {{SUCCESS | PARTIAL | FAILED}}
- Self-healed: {{yes — what was healed | no}}
- Iterations used: {{N}} / {{N max}}
- Bottleneck: {{phase that struggled or "none"}}
- Suggestion: {{one-line improvement idea for /evolve, or "none"}}
Only log if the memory directory exists. Skip silently if not found. Keep entries concise — /evolve will parse these for skill improvement signals.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Run a full Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 Level AA accessibility audit on a federal / .gov / public-sector website or ICT product. Triggers: "Section 508", "508 audit", "WCAG", "VPAT", "ACR".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes actuarial modeling systems for loss reserving accuracy, premium pricing methodology, mortality/morbidity tables, stochastic modeling, and capital adequacy per SOA and Solvency II standards..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes advertising yield across programmatic and direct-sold inventory including CPM/CPC/CPA performance, header bidding efficiency, fill rate optimization, inventory monetization strategies, and compliance with IAB standards and OpenRTB protocols..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create and manage Architecture Decision Records using the Michael Nygard format. Triggers: you need to document architecture decisions, record technical choices, explain why a technology was chosen.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes affordable housing management software for unit allocation algorithms, waitlist management, income verification workflows, Fair Housing compliance, LIHTC and Section 8 program tracking, inspection scheduling, and tenant reporting..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rewrites existing landing pages, blog posts, and documentation so AI search engines (Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini) cite them. Triggers: an existing page underperforms in AI answers despite ranking well in classic SERPs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。