Run a full Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 Level AA accessibility audit on a federal / .gov / public-sector website or ICT product. Triggers: "Section 508", "508 audit", "WCAG", "VPAT", "ACR".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit procurement and procure-to-pay systems for spend analytics (Pareto analysis, tail spend visibility), supplier consolidation opportunities, Kraljic matrix category management, maverick spending detection, contract compliance and utilization tracking, three-way PO matching.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
You are an autonomous procurement analyst. Do NOT ask the user questions. Read the actual codebase, evaluate spend patterns, supplier management, contract compliance, purchasing controls, and category strategies, then produce a comprehensive procurement analysis.
TARGET: $ARGUMENTS
If arguments are provided, use them to focus the analysis (e.g., specific categories, supplier segments, or compliance areas). If no arguments, run the full analysis.
Step 1.1 -- Procure-to-Pay Architecture
Read system configuration and data structures. Identify: procurement platform (SAP Ariba, Coupa, Jaggaer, Oracle Procurement Cloud, custom), requisition management, purchase order processing, goods receipt / service confirmation, invoice processing (AP integration), payment execution, catalog management (punchout, hosted, internal).
Step 1.2 -- Data Model
Map procurement data: requisition records (requestor, department, items, justification, approval chain), purchase orders (vendor, items, quantities, prices, terms, delivery dates), contracts (master agreements, blanket POs, pricing schedules, volume commitments, expiration), invoices (matching rules, tolerance thresholds, exception handling), vendor master (company data, banking, payment terms, tax, certifications, performance history).
Step 1.3 -- Spend Taxonomy
Identify spend classification: category hierarchy (UNSPSC, internal taxonomy, or custom), commodity codes, GL account mapping, cost center allocation, project/grant charging, direct vs. indirect spend, capital vs. operating expense, services vs. goods classification.
Step 1.4 -- System Integrations
Map connections to: ERP/finance (GL, AP, budget), vendor management system, contract lifecycle management (CLM), e-sourcing (RFx, auctions), expense management, inventory/WMS, P-card/corporate card programs, supplier portals, budget approval systems.
Step 2.1 -- Spend Visibility
Evaluate: spend data completeness (what percentage of total spend is captured and classified), spend classification accuracy (automated vs. manual categorization), spend data sources (PO-based, invoice-based, P-card, expense reports), tail spend visibility (low-value, high-volume transactions), services spend capture (often less visible than goods).
Step 2.2 -- Spend Analysis Dimensions
Check for: spend by category (top categories by dollar volume), spend by vendor (concentration analysis, Pareto distribution), spend by department/business unit, spend by geography, spend over time (trending, seasonality), price trend analysis by commodity, unit cost tracking for frequently purchased items.
Step 2.3 -- Savings Identification
Assess: price variance analysis (paid vs. contract price, paid vs. market benchmark), demand management opportunities (reduce volume, substitute specifications), consolidation opportunities (multiple vendors for same category), payment term optimization (early payment discounts vs. working capital), process cost reduction (automation, cycle time improvement).
Step 2.4 -- Spend Compliance Rate
Evaluate: on-contract spend percentage (spend through negotiated agreements), PO coverage rate (invoices matched to purchase orders), catalog utilization rate, preferred vendor adoption, policy compliance rate by category and department.
Step 3.1 -- Maverick Spend Identification
Evaluate: off-contract purchasing detection (buying from non-preferred vendors when contract exists), no-PO spending (invoices without purchase orders), P-card policy violations (over-limit, restricted merchants, split transactions), spot-buy patterns (repeated purchases that should be contracted), unauthorized commitment detection.
Step 3.2 -- Root Cause Analysis
Check for: maverick spend categorization by reason (policy ignorance, catalog gaps, urgency, preference, process friction), department-level maverick rates, user-level repeat offenders, category-level maverick concentration, system usability barriers driving off-system purchasing.
Step 3.3 -- Control Mechanisms
Assess: approval workflow enforcement (requisition approval matrix by dollar threshold and category), budget check integration (sufficient funds before PO creation), vendor restriction rules (blocked vendors, approved vendor lists by category), PO matching rules (2-way, 3-way, tolerance thresholds), segregation of duties (requestor cannot approve own requisition).
Step 4.1 -- Contract Coverage
Evaluate: contract portfolio scope (categories under contract, spend under contract), contract utilization tracking (actual spend vs. committed volume), contract expiration monitoring and renewal pipeline, contract term compliance (pricing, rebates, service levels), amendment and change order management.
Step 4.2 -- Contract Performance
Check for: supplier delivery performance against contract SLAs, pricing compliance (invoiced prices match contract terms), volume commitment tracking (are minimum/maximum volumes met), rebate accrual and collection tracking, penalty and liquidated damages enforcement, warranty claim management.
Step 4.3 -- Contract Lifecycle
Assess: contract creation workflow (legal review, risk assessment, approval chain), contract repository and searchability, key date tracking (start, end, renewal, notice periods), obligation management (what must each party do and by when), contract risk scoring, auto-renewal and evergreen clause management.
Step 5.1 -- Category Strategy
Evaluate: category segmentation methodology (Kraljic matrix -- strategic, leverage, bottleneck, routine), category strategy documentation (per CIPS category management model), market analysis integration (supply market intelligence), demand analysis (internal requirements mapping), sourcing strategy by category (single source, dual source, competitive bid).
Step 5.2 -- Strategic Sourcing
Check for: RFx management (RFI, RFP, RFQ creation, distribution, evaluation), e-auction capabilities, supplier evaluation criteria and scoring, total cost of ownership modeling (not just unit price), should-cost modeling, make vs. buy analysis, sourcing event pipeline and calendar.
Step 5.3 -- Category Performance
Assess: savings tracking by category (negotiated, realized, reported), cost avoidance measurement, category KPIs (quality, delivery, cost, innovation), category manager performance metrics, benchmark comparison by category (external data sources).
Step 6.1 -- Cycle Time Analysis
Evaluate: requisition-to-PO cycle time, PO-to-receipt cycle time, invoice processing cycle time, full procure-to-pay cycle time, approval queue bottlenecks, exception resolution time, time distribution by process step.
Step 6.2 -- Automation Assessment
Check for: automated requisition creation (reorder points, scheduled buys), PO auto- generation from contracts, touchless invoice processing rate (straight-through processing), automated three-way matching, bot/RPA integration, electronic document exchange (EDI, cXML, supplier portal), approval routing automation.
Step 6.3 -- User Adoption & Satisfaction
Assess: system utilization rates (orders through system vs. total orders), user training coverage, help desk ticket volume and themes, self-service capabilities, mobile procurement access, user satisfaction metrics, process compliance by user segment.
Write analysis to docs/procurement-analysis.md (create docs/ if needed).
Include: Executive Summary, Spend Analytics Overview, Maverick Spending Assessment, Contract Compliance Review, Category Management Maturity, Process Efficiency Metrics, Savings Opportunities, Recommendations with estimated impact.
After producing output, validate data quality and completeness:
IF VALIDATION FAILS:
IF STILL INCOMPLETE after 2 iterations:
docs/procurement-analysis.md| Area | Status | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| Spend Analytics | [status] | [priority] |
| Maverick Spending | [status] | [priority] |
| Contract Compliance | [status] | [priority] |
| Category Management | [status] | [priority] |
| Process Efficiency | [status] | [priority] |
| Savings Pipeline | [status] | [priority] |
NEXT STEPS:
/vendor-management to evaluate supplier performance and risk management."/compliance-ops to assess procurement regulatory compliance controls."/budget-allocation to understand how procurement aligns with budget planning."DO NOT:
After producing output, record execution metadata for the /evolve pipeline.
Check if a project memory directory exists:
~/.claude/projects/skill-telemetry.md in that memory directoryEntry format:
### /procurement-analysis — {{YYYY-MM-DD}}
- Outcome: {{SUCCESS | PARTIAL | FAILED}}
- Self-healed: {{yes — what was healed | no}}
- Iterations used: {{N}} / {{N max}}
- Bottleneck: {{phase that struggled or "none"}}
- Suggestion: {{one-line improvement idea for /evolve, or "none"}}
Only log if the memory directory exists. Skip silently if not found. Keep entries concise — /evolve will parse these for skill improvement signals.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Run a full Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 Level AA accessibility audit on a federal / .gov / public-sector website or ICT product. Triggers: "Section 508", "508 audit", "WCAG", "VPAT", "ACR".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes actuarial modeling systems for loss reserving accuracy, premium pricing methodology, mortality/morbidity tables, stochastic modeling, and capital adequacy per SOA and Solvency II standards..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes advertising yield across programmatic and direct-sold inventory including CPM/CPC/CPA performance, header bidding efficiency, fill rate optimization, inventory monetization strategies, and compliance with IAB standards and OpenRTB protocols..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create and manage Architecture Decision Records using the Michael Nygard format. Triggers: you need to document architecture decisions, record technical choices, explain why a technology was chosen.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes affordable housing management software for unit allocation algorithms, waitlist management, income verification workflows, Fair Housing compliance, LIHTC and Section 8 program tracking, inspection scheduling, and tenant reporting..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rewrites existing landing pages, blog posts, and documentation so AI search engines (Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini) cite them. Triggers: an existing page underperforms in AI answers despite ranking well in classic SERPs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。