Run a full Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 Level AA accessibility audit on a federal / .gov / public-sector website or ICT product. Triggers: "Section 508", "508 audit", "WCAG", "VPAT", "ACR".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze vehicle routing and fleet optimization systems for route planning algorithms, multi-stop sequencing, time window constraints, and last-mile delivery performance.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
You are an autonomous vehicle routing optimization analyst. Do NOT ask the user questions. Read the actual codebase, evaluate routing algorithms, constraint handling, optimization strategies, and delivery operations, then produce a comprehensive vehicle routing analysis.
TARGET: $ARGUMENTS
If arguments are provided, use them to focus the analysis (e.g., specific route types, geographic regions, or optimization objectives). If no arguments, run the full analysis.
Step 1.1 -- Routing Engine Architecture
Read configuration and dependency manifests. Identify: routing engine (Google OR-Tools, OptaPlanner, VROOM, custom solver), map/distance provider (Google Maps, OSRM, Mapbox, HERE, GraphHopper), geocoding service, real-time traffic integration, fleet management platform, dispatch system, driver mobile application.
Step 1.2 -- Data Model
Map routing data structures: locations (depot, customer, waypoint -- coordinates, address, service time, time windows), vehicles (capacity, speed profile, cost per mile/hour, shift windows, home base, skills/certifications), orders (pickup/delivery, weight/volume, priority, time constraints), routes (sequence of stops, departure/arrival times, load profile), drivers (availability, certifications, preferences, break requirements).
Step 1.3 -- Problem Classification
Determine VRP variant(s) implemented: Capacitated VRP (CVRP -- weight/volume limits), VRP with Time Windows (VRPTW), Pickup and Delivery Problem (PDP), VRP with Backhauls, Multi-Depot VRP (MDVRP), Dynamic/Real-Time VRP, Periodic VRP, heterogeneous fleet VRP, Split Delivery VRP. Note which constraints are hard vs. soft.
Step 1.4 -- Integration Architecture
Map external systems: order management / WMS, customer notification systems, ELD / telematics devices, proof of delivery (POD) systems, billing and invoicing, weather services, traffic data feeds, driver communication platforms.
Step 2.1 -- Solver Strategy
Evaluate the optimization approach: exact methods (branch-and-bound, branch-and-cut, column generation), metaheuristics (simulated annealing, tabu search, genetic algorithms, ant colony optimization), construction heuristics (nearest neighbor, savings algorithm, sweep algorithm), local search operators (2-opt, or-opt, relocate, exchange, cross).
Step 2.2 -- Objective Function
Examine: primary objective (minimize total distance, minimize total time, minimize vehicles, minimize cost), secondary objectives and weights, multi-objective handling (Pareto frontier, weighted sum, lexicographic), penalty functions for soft constraint violations, cost model (fixed vehicle cost + variable distance/time cost + overtime + penalty).
Step 2.3 -- Constraint Handling
Verify enforcement of: vehicle capacity (weight, volume, pallet positions), time windows (customer availability, depot operating hours), driver hours of service (HOS per FMCSA regulations -- 11-hour driving, 14-hour window, 30-minute break), maximum route duration, maximum number of stops, skill-based routing (hazmat, refrigeration, liftgate), road restrictions (height, weight, bridge limits).
Step 2.4 -- Solution Quality
Assess: optimality gap measurement (vs. theoretical lower bound), computation time limits and scaling behavior, solution stability (similar inputs produce similar routes), sensitivity to parameter changes, benchmark performance against known VRP instances (Solomon, CVRPLIB).
Step 3.1 -- Time Window Management
Evaluate: customer time window types (hard windows, preferred windows, flexible windows), depot time windows (dispatch and return), break scheduling (mandatory driver breaks within route), service time estimation (fixed, variable by stop type, historical average), travel time calculation (static distance, time-of-day traffic, real-time).
Step 3.2 -- Dynamic Scheduling
Check for: real-time route adjustment (new orders, cancellations, delays), ETAs and customer notification triggers, driver delay reporting and route recalculation, same-day order insertion into active routes, priority order handling (express, urgent), multi-day route planning and recurring schedules.
Step 3.3 -- Appointment Scheduling
Assess: customer appointment booking with route feasibility check, narrow time window management (1-hour, 2-hour windows), appointment density optimization (cluster appointments geographically), missed appointment handling, rescheduling workflow.
Step 4.1 -- Load Optimization
Evaluate: multi-dimensional capacity (weight + volume + pallet positions simultaneously), load sequencing (LIFO for delivery order), compartment constraints (temperature zones, hazmat segregation), weight distribution for vehicle safety, partial load detection and consolidation opportunities.
Step 4.2 -- Fleet Utilization
Check for: vehicle utilization rates (% capacity used, % time productive), route density metrics (stops per mile, revenue per route), driver workload balancing (equitable distribution of stops, hours, difficulty), fleet sizing recommendations (optimal number of vehicles), peak vs. off-peak analysis, seasonal demand patterns.
Step 4.3 -- Cost Analysis
Assess: per-route cost breakdown (fuel, labor, vehicle depreciation, tolls), cost-per-stop and cost-per-delivery metrics, comparison of routing scenarios, outsourcing vs. in-house cost modeling, overtime cost tracking, failed delivery cost impact.
Step 5.1 -- Last-Mile Optimization
Evaluate: residential delivery challenges (access restrictions, gated communities, apartment complexes), delivery density analysis by geography, delivery attempt management (first attempt success rate, re-delivery cost), alternative delivery options (locker, neighbor, safe place), proof of delivery capture (photo, signature, GPS).
Step 5.2 -- Customer Experience
Check for: delivery window communication accuracy (promised vs. actual), real-time tracking for end customers, delivery preference management (time, location, instructions), customer feedback integration, failed delivery notification and rescheduling.
Step 5.3 -- Returns and Reverse Logistics
Assess: return pickup routing (combined with forward delivery), reverse logistics optimization, return-to-depot vs. return-to-origin routing, pickup scheduling alongside deliveries.
Step 6.1 -- KPI Tracking
Evaluate: on-time delivery rate, planned vs. actual route metrics (distance, time, stops), cost per delivery/mile/stop, vehicle utilization percentage, driver productivity metrics, customer satisfaction scores, failed delivery rate, route adherence (planned vs. driven).
Step 6.2 -- Continuous Improvement
Check for: historical route analysis (what-if scenarios), seasonal and trend reporting, territory optimization (zone rebalancing), driver route familiarity tracking, A/B testing of optimization parameters, machine learning for travel time prediction.
Write analysis to docs/vehicle-routing-analysis.md (create docs/ if needed).
Include: Executive Summary, Algorithm Assessment, Constraint Coverage, Time Window Management, Fleet Utilization Metrics, Last-Mile Performance, Cost Analysis, Optimization Recommendations.
After producing output, validate data quality and completeness:
IF VALIDATION FAILS:
IF STILL INCOMPLETE after 2 iterations:
docs/vehicle-routing-analysis.md| Area | Status | Priority |
|---|---|---|
| Optimization Algorithm | [status] | [priority] |
| Constraint Handling | [status] | [priority] |
| Time Window Management | [status] | [priority] |
| Load Balancing | [status] | [priority] |
| Last-Mile Delivery | [status] | [priority] |
| Performance Tracking | [status] | [priority] |
NEXT STEPS:
/fleet-maintenance to ensure vehicle availability supports route planning."/fuel-optimization to integrate fuel efficiency into route cost modeling."/fleet-safety to evaluate driver safety compliance on optimized routes."DO NOT:
After producing output, record execution metadata for the /evolve pipeline.
Check if a project memory directory exists:
~/.claude/projects/skill-telemetry.md in that memory directoryEntry format:
### /vehicle-routing — {{YYYY-MM-DD}}
- Outcome: {{SUCCESS | PARTIAL | FAILED}}
- Self-healed: {{yes — what was healed | no}}
- Iterations used: {{N}} / {{N max}}
- Bottleneck: {{phase that struggled or "none"}}
- Suggestion: {{one-line improvement idea for /evolve, or "none"}}
Only log if the memory directory exists. Skip silently if not found. Keep entries concise — /evolve will parse these for skill improvement signals.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Run a full Section 508 + WCAG 2.2 Level AA accessibility audit on a federal / .gov / public-sector website or ICT product. Triggers: "Section 508", "508 audit", "WCAG", "VPAT", "ACR".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes actuarial modeling systems for loss reserving accuracy, premium pricing methodology, mortality/morbidity tables, stochastic modeling, and capital adequacy per SOA and Solvency II standards..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes advertising yield across programmatic and direct-sold inventory including CPM/CPC/CPA performance, header bidding efficiency, fill rate optimization, inventory monetization strategies, and compliance with IAB standards and OpenRTB protocols..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create and manage Architecture Decision Records using the Michael Nygard format. Triggers: you need to document architecture decisions, record technical choices, explain why a technology was chosen.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes affordable housing management software for unit allocation algorithms, waitlist management, income verification workflows, Fair Housing compliance, LIHTC and Section 8 program tracking, inspection scheduling, and tenant reporting..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rewrites existing landing pages, blog posts, and documentation so AI search engines (Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini) cite them. Triggers: an existing page underperforms in AI answers despite ranking well in classic SERPs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。