Analyze task complexity and route to a mode by artifact: direct fix for clear-scope changes, or a plan file when the approach needs to be written down. Use when the user asks to "turboplan", "run turboplan", "plan this task", "turbo plan mode", "plan and implement", or "use turboplan instead of plan mode".
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Analyze task complexity to recommend an execution mode, then let the user set the final route.
Categorize the user-supplied task along these dimensions using subjective judgment. This analysis makes the recommendation informed:
Modes are named by what they produce: no plan, or a plan file.
| Mode | Criteria | Route |
|---|---|---|
| Direct | Clear scope, with any remaining decisions small enough to settle in conversation rather than write down. Aligns on the shape, then implements. | Read references/direct-mode.md and follow its steps. |
| Plan | The approach warrants writing down before implementing — to survey patterns, settle architectural decisions, or survive a fresh session. Produces a plan file, however large the work turns out to be. | Read references/plan-mode.md and follow its steps. |
Form a recommended route from the dimensions and criteria above. Output the recommendation as text: the recommended mode and a line or two on why it fits over its neighbor.
Then use AskUserQuestion to have the user set the final route. Offer the recommended mode first, marked "(Recommended)", alongside the other mode; the auto-appended "Other" lets the user describe a different path.
Add a third Get a second opinion option whenever committing to the wrong mode would cost a session of rework, and whenever the recommended mode does not earn "(Recommended)" with conviction. It runs the /consult-codex skill for the soundest route given the task's scope, stakes, and unknowns. Then resolve the route with that answer in hand, re-asking when the choice stays the user's.
Carry the confirmed route into its reference file from the table above and follow its steps.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Apply findings by making the suggested code changes. Applies accepted verdicts, escalates ambiguous findings to the user, and offers to note genuine improvements for later. Use when the user asks to "apply findings", "apply fixes", "apply suggestions", "apply accepted findings", "fix the findings", or "apply the review results".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit the turbo skill lessons that /self-improve writes into this repo's .turbo/handoff/ from other projects, apply the ones the user approves, delete the consumed handoffs, commit and push, and update the installed Turbo skills. Use when the user asks to "read .turbo/handoff and let me know what you think", "read the handoff files and let me know what you think", "review the lesson handoffs", "apply the self-improve handoffs", or "process the turbo handoffs".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess project-wide structural technical debt: complexity hotspots, deprecated API usage, duplication clusters, architecture rot, and low-value tests. Ranks findings by impact and refactor effort into a report at .turbo/technical-debt.md. Use when the user asks to "assess technical debt", "find technical debt", "review technical debt", "what should we refactor", "find refactoring candidates", "where is the code rot", "what's our worst code", "find low-value tests", or "which tests can we delete". Analysis-only — does not modify code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Shared changelog conventions and formatting rules referenced by /create-changelog and /update-changelog. Not typically invoked directly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Shared changelog conventions and formatting rules referenced by $create-changelog and $update-changelog. Not typically invoked directly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a non-interactive Claude Code print-mode call from Codex. Use when the user asks to "claude print", "ask claude", "run claude", "consult claude", or when a Codex Turbo skill needs Claude as an independent peer reviewer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。