本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

reconnaissance

Domain assessment and web application mapping - subdomain discovery, port scanning, endpoint enumeration, API discovery, and attack surface analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

transilienceai/communitytoolsスター 595(GitHub 595 + cccskills 0)

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(10)

  • SKILL.md5.6 KB
  • reference/anti-bot-bypass.md4.8 KB
  • reference/INDEX.md2.4 KB
  • reference/reconnaissance-principles.md3.7 KB
  • reference/scenarios/api-endpoint-discovery.md7.1 KB
  • reference/scenarios/obfuscated-js-deobfuscation.md5.7 KB
  • reference/scenarios/port-scanning.md5.1 KB
  • reference/scenarios/subdomain-enumeration.md5.1 KB
  • reference/scenarios/vhost-enumeration.md6.7 KB
  • reference/waf-edge-bypass.md6.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Reconnaissance

Domain and web application reconnaissance. Discovers subdomains, open ports, endpoints, APIs, and JavaScript routes to build attack surface inventory.

Phases

Domain Assessment

  1. Subdomain Discovery - Passive DNS, certificate transparency, DNS brute-forcing, zone transfers
  2. Port Scanning - nmap/masscan (top 1000/10000/all), service detection, OS fingerprinting
  3. Service Enumeration - Version detection, banner grabbing, protocol-specific enumeration

Web Application Mapping

  1. Software Inventory - Dependencies, frameworks, SBOM generation
  2. Active Scanning - ffuf, gobuster, nikto, ZAP spider for directories/files
  3. API Discovery - REST, GraphQL, SOAP, WebSocket, Swagger/OpenAPI docs
  4. JavaScript & SPA - Client-side routes, dynamic scripts, browser storage
  5. Surface Analysis - Categorize attack surfaces, prioritize by risk

Output

inventory/  - JSON: subdomains, ports, endpoints, APIs, SBOM
analysis/   - MD: attack-surface, testing-checklist
raw/        - Tool outputs (nmap, ffuf, ZAP, subfinder)

Tools

subfinder, amass, certspotter, crt.sh, nmap, masscan, nuclei, sslscan, ffuf, gobuster, nikto, ZAP, Playwright MCP

Related Skills

  • /osint - Run alongside reconnaissance for repository enumeration, secret scanning, and git history analysis

Rules

  1. Passive discovery before active scanning
  2. Always run /osint in parallel during Phase 2
  3. Respect rate limits
  4. Verify subdomains are live before port scanning
  5. Save all raw tool outputs
  6. HTTP response header vhost leaks: Always check response headers on the raw IP (curl -sI http://IP/). Headers like X-Backend-Server, X-Forwarded-Host, X-Served-By, X-Upstream often leak internal hostnames/vhosts not discoverable via DNS or brute-force. Add discovered hostnames to /etc/hosts immediately.
  7. Wildcard SSL certs (*.domain.tld in SAN) = strong indicator of hidden vhosts. Always run vhost brute-force with ffuf -u https://IP -k -H "Host: FUZZ.domain.tld" -w subdomains.txt -mc all -fs <default_size> when wildcard SAN detected. Compare response size/status vs default vhost to identify valid subdomains.
  8. VHost enumeration without ffuf: When ffuf/gobuster unavailable, use shell loop: for sub in admin dev api portal dashboard staging git; do code=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}:%{size_download}" -H "Host: ${sub}.DOMAIN" http://IP); echo "$sub: $code"; done — filter by response size difference from default page.
  9. Web management panels: When discovering admin vhosts (admin., panel., manage.*), check for known management UIs: Nginx UI (manifest.json → "Nginx UI"), Cockpit, Webmin, phpMyAdmin. These often have unauthenticated API endpoints or known CVEs. Check /api/backup, /api/settings, /api/install for Nginx UI specifically.
  10. Mobile / native client downloads on the marketing tier: when the public web tier has a download link to an .apk / .dmg / .exe / .ipa, the "real" API endpoint and its required headers are usually only reachable from that client. The web HTML shows nothing useful; the API is gated behind a static User-Agent / Host that's hard-coded in the binary. Always pull the client and decompile/extract before assuming the box is a static-page only. For Android React Native: unzip <app>.apk -d ext/ && file ext/assets/index.android.bundle. The bundle is typically obfuscator.io-style (function _0xNNNN(idx) decoder + array.shift() IIFE that loops until a parseInt-equation == target). Don't reverse it by hand — extract decoder + array literal + IIFE into a standalone Node.js file and dump every index in seconds: for(let i=baseHex; i<baseHex+arr.length; i++) console.log(i.toString(16), _0xDecode(i));. Then reconstruct the obfuscated object literal of the API call (URL = concatenation of 4–7 short fragments, headers likewise) and replay with the recovered values verbatim.
  11. Focused AD port scan for Windows targets: when initial fingerprinting shows a Windows DC archetype (any of 53/135/139/445/389 open), skip -p- and run a focused scan over the 13 AD-relevant ports first — it finishes in seconds and covers everything that matters.
    nmap -Pn -sC -sV -p 53,88,135,139,389,445,464,593,636,3268,3269,5985,5986,9389 -oA recon/ad-focused TARGET
    
    Ports rationale: 53 DNS, 88 Kerberos, 135 RPC, 139/445 SMB, 389/636 LDAP/LDAPS, 464 kpasswd, 593 RPC-over-HTTPS, 3268/3269 GC/GC-LDAPS, 5985 WinRM (HTTP), 5986 WinRM (HTTPS — cert auth), 9389 AD Web Services. Always probe BOTH 5985 and 5986 — when 5985 is filtered, 5986 with client-cert auth is a common foothold path (see skills/system/reference/foothold-patterns.md WinRM cert-auth foothold). Only fall back to -p- if (a) no flag-yielding service surfaces in the focused scan, or (b) you suspect a non-standard app on a high port (custom web service, RDP-on-non-3389, etc.). Don't burn 30 minutes on full TCP sweeps when the AD archetype is obvious.
  12. CT-log enumeration is MANDATORY: CT-log enumeration (crt.sh / certspotter / subfinder) is MANDATORY on every engagement that names an apex domain, INCLUDING grey-box engagements where hostnames were provided — provided hostnames are a seed, not the surface. CDN/WAF-fronted targets additionally get an origin-discovery pass (direct cloud endpoints, archive.org CDX, historical DNS). The crt.sh/subfinder commands already ship in reference/scenarios/subdomain-enumeration.md — use them.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

Offensive AI security testing and exploitation framework. Systematically tests LLM applications for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities including prompt injection, model extraction, data poisoning, and supply chain attacks. Integrates with pentest workflows to discover and exploit AI-specific threats.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

transilienceai/communitytools5952026年7月30日 更新

API security testing - GraphQL, REST API, WebSocket, and Web-LLM attack techniques.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

transilienceai/communitytools5952026年7月30日 更新

Stitches confirmed single-asset findings into multi-hop attack paths across the organization. Builds a graph where nodes are assets and edges are confirmed exploit hops citing the findings that enable them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

transilienceai/communitytools5952026年7月30日 更新

Acquire an authenticated session THROUGH MFA/OTP on an in-scope target and emit a reusable session artifact (Playwright storageState + Bearer) so executors can test the post-auth attack surface. Use when the highest-value authenticated classes (BOLA/IDOR/mass-assignment/injection on the real data APIs) are blocked because login is gated by SMS-OTP or TOTP MFA. Distinct from the authentication skill (which ATTACKS auth); this one legitimately authenticates and hands the session to the rest of the engagement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

transilienceai/communitytools5952026年7月30日 更新

Authentication security testing - auth bypass, JWT attacks, OAuth flaws, password attacks, 2FA bypass, CAPTCHA bypass, and bot detection evasion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

transilienceai/communitytools5952026年7月30日 更新

Smart contract security testing and blockchain CTF exploitation. Covers Solidity vulnerability analysis, EVM storage manipulation, delegatecall attacks, CREATE/CREATE2 address prediction, and common DeFi exploit patterns. Use when analyzing Solidity contracts, solving blockchain challenges, or testing smart contract security.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

transilienceai/communitytools5952026年7月30日 更新

transilienceai のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する