本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

benchmark

Measure Wado's performance or the size of the Wasm it generates, and refresh the benchmark/ and wasm-size/ README files. Use for any benchmarking or size-measurement request, whichever benchmark it names.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

wado-lang/wadoスター 119(GitHub 119 + cccskills 0)

実行スコア 未検証

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md4.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Benchmark

Run the benchmarks and update benchmark/README.md (and wasm-size/README.md).

Prerequisites

mise run on-task-started
  • vendor/wasmtime submodule must exist (the SessionStart hook handles it; otherwise git submodule update --init --recommend-shallow vendor/wasmtime).
  • http-routing needs oha (cargo install oha); bun is mise-managed.
  • gale-gen's and sqlite-parse's ANTLR4 references need java and javac, which benchmark/mise.toml provides; the jar is fetched to ~/.cache/gale. Those rows are skipped if the tool is absent.
  • wasm-size needs rustup target add wasm32-wasip1 and Moonbit (curl -fsSL https://cli.moonbitlang.com/install/unix.sh | bash, then moon update in each wasm-size/* dir).

Procedure

  1. Run mise run benchmark-all three times, each to its own log in scratchpad/, then pick per row with node benchmark/pick.ts scratchpad/run{1,2,3}.log (throttling only ever slows things down). Use that tool rather than reading the logs by eye: it keys rows by (task, implementation, phase) and selects on ms/iter, so a rate that rounds to a tie across runs cannot pair with the wrong ms/iter. Which benchmarks run, and in what order, is benchmark/mise.toml's all task.
  2. Run http-routing separately (needs oha + pinned cores): SLICE=10 ROUNDS=3 SHAPES="1 4" mise run benchmark-http-routing. It keeps the per-(server, request) max internally, so one invocation suffices, and it measures one worker shape per entry in SHAPES. Add HEADROOM_CHECK=1 when CONNECTIONS_PER_WORKER, OHA_CORE_COUNT or SHAPES changed, to confirm oha was not the ceiling.
  3. Refresh the README Environment line versions: mise exec -- node --version, mise exec -- bun --version, rustc --version, cc --version | head -1 (wasmtime version is the vendored vendor/wasmtime workspace version).
  4. Update the tables, following README.md's existing layout. http-routing is req/s (higher is better), one table per worker shape. Keep measured figures inside tables — prose around them is not re-measured and drifts.
  5. wasm-size: mise run report-wasm-size, then update wasm-size/README.md.

Sweeping a compiler knob

WADO_BENCH_FLAGS is appended to every wado compile / wado run the harness issues, so an arm costs a benchmark run rather than a release rebuild:

set -e  # a failed arm would leave pick.ts choosing among the rest
for t in 13 20 32; do
  WADO_BENCH_FLAGS="--optimize-inline-threshold $t" mise run benchmark-all > scratchpad/thr$t.log 2>&1
done
node benchmark/pick.ts scratchpad/thr{13,20,32}.log

Read the sweep with pick.ts the same way as a best-of-three: it keys rows by (task, implementation, phase), so the "best" column names the winning arm per row. Only a knob both wado compile and wado run accept can be swept this way, since the harness passes the flags to both. The knob a sweep settles on is a default in optimize.rs, not a flag the README's numbers were taken under — re-run the suite unflagged before updating the tables.

Comparing the settled default against origin/main is a different measurement, and WADO_BIN plus ab.ts is how: see the wado-performance skill.

Reading output

Each program prints a throughput line — <rate> <unit>/s (<ms> ms/iter, <n> iter) — per phase (zlib prints two phases, Compress:/Decompress:). Read the rate and the ms/iter straight off; the iteration count auto-calibrates to ~1s, so there is no total to report. The unit is the benchmark's own (numbers/s, px/s, conversions/s, MB/s, req/s); vs best = fastest rate / this rate.

Report a change between two measurements with improvement as positive: +9% means faster, -13% slower. This is the sign ab.ts prints.

Each benchmark prints the implementations it compared, so read them off the run rather than from a list here. Two are conditional: the ANTLR4 rows for sqlite-parse and gale-gen are skipped when java is absent, and the run says SKIP: when it drops one.

Workload sizing

Benchmarks auto-calibrate their iteration count to run ~1s, so no manual denomination is needed. A workload whose single iteration approaches that reports one iteration and stops averaging — shrink its problem size, across every language implementation of that benchmark, until it calibrates again.

Notes

  • Tool versions come from mise, not the system.
  • Cloud VMs are noisy; best-of-three absorbs the drift.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

コメント

ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。

まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。

送信するとすぐに公開されます。メールアドレスや電話番号などの個人情報は書かないでください。URL は 2 つまでです。

0 / 1000 文字

このフォームは reCAPTCHA で保護されており、Google のプライバシーポリシーと利用規約が適用されます。

同じリポジトリのスキル

ci-timing

無料

Measure how long GitHub Actions jobs and steps took across past runs, and find the pull request that made CI slower. Use for any question about CI duration, a slow job, or when CI got slow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

wado-lang/wado1192026年10月26日 更新

How to answer code review feedback — a human reviewer, CodeRabbit, or any review bot. Verify the findings, report the classes they are instances of to the user before fixing, then fix the class rather than the sites named. Put design decisions to the user, then run /distill. Invoke when responding to review comments on a pull request, or to the findings of a /code-review run.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

wado-lang/wado1192026年10月26日 更新

Investigate and improve code coverage for the wado-compiler crate. Use for any question about what the tests do and do not reach, dead code included.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

wado-lang/wado1192026年10月26日 更新

cr

無料

Review the branch with /code-review at high, then answer the findings with /code-review-response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

wado-lang/wado1192026年10月26日 更新

debugger

無料

Use rust-gdb to inspect variables and step through code without modifying it. Prefer it over print debugging for any investigation into what the compiler is actually doing (lldb is unavailable on Claude Code Web).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

wado-lang/wado1192026年10月26日 更新

distill

無料

Cut the branch down to what the code cannot say: reuse what exists, remove duplication, dead code, and wasted work, turn invariants into asserts, and delete the comments the code already speaks. Run it after answering review feedback too — a fix written to satisfy a reviewer is the least distilled code on the branch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

wado-lang/wado1192026年10月26日 更新

wado-lang のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する