本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

deliverable-selfloop

Score an existing reader-facing deliverable and emit a deterministic PASS/FAIL scorecard plus bounded repair plan; use after synthesis, not to rewrite content.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(4)

  • SKILL.md2.0 KB
  • references/overview.md1.3 KB
  • references/quality_checklist.md1.6 KB
  • scripts/run.py9.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Deliverable Self-Loop

Runs the final quality gate for a reader-facing deliverable and always writes a PASS/FAIL report.

Inputs

Primary input depends on the active pipeline contract:

  • brief deliverable
  • paper-review deliverable
  • evidence-review deliverable
  • idea memo bundle
  • tutorial deliverable

Output

  • output/DELIVERABLE_SELFLOOP_TODO.md
  • for research-brief: output/BRIEF_SCORECARD.md and output/BRIEF_SCORECARD.json
  • for paper-review: output/REVIEW_SCORECARD.md and output/REVIEW_SCORECARD.json
  • for idea-brainstorm: output/IDEA_SCORECARD.md and output/IDEA_SCORECARD.json
  • for evidence-review: output/EVIDENCE_SCORECARD.md and output/EVIDENCE_SCORECARD.json

Dispatch rule

The gate should dispatch by pipeline contract first:

  • quality_contract.deliverable_kind

Only fall back to legacy profile-name checks when contract metadata is missing.

Script boundary

scripts/run.py should:

  • detect the active deliverable contract
  • run the matching evaluator
  • always write a report

It should not mutate the deliverable itself.

Acceptance

  • report exists
  • report contains - Status: PASS or - Status: FAIL
  • PASS only when the active deliverable satisfies its minimum section / artifact contract
  • research-brief additionally requires valid core-set pointers and the configured score threshold
  • paper-review additionally requires the configured score threshold and all critical rubric dimensions
  • idea-brainstorm additionally requires traceable anchors, actionable lead directions, and the configured score threshold
  • evidence-review additionally requires clause-linked screening, complete extraction rows, synthesis pointers, and the configured score threshold

Non-goals

  • rewriting the deliverable
  • choosing upstream fixes beyond pointing to the missing contract items

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Internal template for creating or refactoring a skill into the repository's reference-first shape. **Trigger**: reference-first template, blueprint skill, create a reusable skill, refactor a script-heavy skill. **Use when**: you need a lean `SKILL.md`, explicit `references/`, machine-readable `assets/`, and a minimal deterministic `run.py`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills5132026年10月5日 更新

Download a small corpus of open-access arXiv survey/review PDFs about agentic systems and extract text for style learning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills5132026年10月5日 更新

Extract per-subsection “anchor facts” (NO PROSE) from evidence packs so the writer is forced to include concrete numbers/benchmarks/limitations instead of generic summaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills5132026年10月5日 更新

Curate reader-facing survey tables for the Appendix (clean layout + high information density), using only in-scope evidence and existing citation keys.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills5132026年10月5日 更新

Build a final, machine-readable argument snapshot from current H3 sections and refresh section fingerprints before merge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills5132026年10月5日 更新

Audit one research Workspace for declared Unit outputs and Pipeline target Artifacts, writing `output/CONTRACT_REPORT.md`; use for mid-Run coverage snapshots or final delivery completeness, not deep provenance integrity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills5132026年10月5日 更新

WILLOSCAR のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する