其他技能

Reviews a set of knowledge files or a knowledge base listing and returns a draft hygiene table, one row per file: duplication signals with the matching file, staleness signals, conflicts between files on the same topic with both passages quoted, missing or unverified owners, and one proposed action per file (Keep, Update, Merge into, Retire, Assign owner, Confirm with owner) for the owner to decide. Never edits, merges, moves or deletes a file. Use when the user asks to "review our knowledge base for duplicates", "which KB articles are stale", "find conflicting articles", "which articles have no owner" or "run a hygiene check on these files". Do not use for review-date sweeps of a document library with owner reminders, use sharepoint-review-sweeper instead; for writing one article, use knowledge-article-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Triages a batch of customer support tickets (helpdesk export, shared mailbox, chat transcripts, web forms) into one row per ticket with category, urgency graded on the evidence in the ticket, suggested next action and owner, plus a DRAFT customer reply for every ticket that needs one, returned as one Markdown pack. Use when the user asks to "triage these tickets", "sort the support queue", "what needs an answer first", "categorise this backlog", "draft replies for these tickets" or "build today's queue review". Do not use for internal requests from colleagues, use request-intake-triage instead; for one long thread that needs handing over, use escalation-summary; for a personal mailbox, use inbox-triage. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Proposes the piping content a P&ID adds to an accepted PFD process model: line inventory with off-page continuity and required ancillary lines, line identification elements per the project line numbering procedure, connection items at nozzles matched to a quoted schedule, per quoted standards, specification break questions and observations. Every proposal cites its source and revision; no source, no proposal; never sizes a line or selects a class. Use when the user asks to "run the piping enrichment", "start the discipline enrichment", "list the lines the P&ID adds to this PFD" or "fill the line identifiers from the numbering procedure" after gate G2. Do not use for instruments, loops or instrument tags, use instrumentation-and-control-enrichment instead; do not use before gate G2, use process-model-check. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Proposes tag and number structures for the new lines and instruments in a P&ID draft according to the project's numbering procedures, checks every tag extracted from the PFD against the quoted procedure format, and lists cross-section identifier mismatches and the registry checks a human must run. Never invents a numbering convention, never alters a PFD tag and never assigns a sequence number the procedure reserves for the registry. Use when the user asks to "run the tagging and numbering section", "check the tags against the numbering procedure", "propose the tag structure for the new lines and instruments" or "list the registry checks before validation" after the process safety flags. Do not use for validating the four sections, use validation-and-review-package instead; do not use for instrument content, use instrumentation-and-control-enrichment. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Builds a self-contained single-file HTML project dashboard (status banner, milestones table, risks heat list, decisions log, links) from the project tracker files the user attaches, pastes or holds in configured knowledge sources, and returns the complete HTML source in chat ready to save as dashboard-project-date.html. Use when the user asks to "build a dashboard for this project", "make a status page I can pin in the team channel", "give me an HTML overview of milestones, risks and decisions", "refresh the project dashboard from the tracker" or "turn these tracker files into a one-page visual summary". Do not use for creating or updating the tracker files or for the written weekly status report, use project-status-tracker instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Drafts a document transmittal (header, one line per document with revision and purpose of issue, distribution with action required, blank acknowledgement block) from a document list and the project's transmittal template, with UNKNOWN for anything not stated and questions for document control. Never assigns a transmittal number, changes a revision or marks anything issued. Use when the user asks to "draft a transmittal for these documents", "fill in the issue sheet" or "prepare the document issue note". Do not use for checking a register or deliverables list, use master-document-register-check instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Proposes the instrumentation and control content a P&ID adds to an accepted PFD process model: instruments drawn carried over as facts, measurement points and control loops the control philosophy requires, tag structure per the project instrument numbering procedure, system interfaces, and alarms, interlocks, trips and fail actions as quoted. Never assigns safety functions, ranges or setpoints. Use when the user asks to "run the instrumentation and control enrichment", "add the instrument section to the P&ID draft", "list the control loops the philosophy requires" or "carry the PFD instruments into the P&ID" after the piping section. Do not use for safety flags, SIL or trip classification, use process-safety-flags instead; do not use to assign tag numbers, use tagging-and-numbering. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Maps every proposed P&ID object from an accepted enrichment draft to the generic family, catalogue class and required attributes the project's intelligent P&ID authoring tool would need, as a readiness table with UNKNOWN wherever the project catalogue extract is not provided, plus connectivity readiness per line and a numbered list of import blockers. Mapping only: it never writes to the tool, never produces an import file and never claims a class exists in the catalogue. Use when the user asks to "build the readiness map", "show how far the draft is from a sandbox import", "list what would block the import", "map the objects to the tool catalogue" or "check attribute readiness against the catalogue extract" after gate G3. Do not use for validating the discipline sections or assembling the review package, use validation-and-review-package instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Runs twice in a PFD to P&ID job. Part 1, before gate G3, validates the discipline proposals for provenance, UNKNOWN handling, conflicts, prohibited content and cross-section consistency and returns results and blocking items. Part 2, before gate G5, assembles the review package, with job header, gate record, every register and proposal, consolidated UNKNOWN list, feedback log and closing statement. Use when the user asks to "validate the enrichment", "run validation before G3", "assemble the review package" or "build the G5 package". Do not use for the readiness map, use pid-tool-readiness-mapping instead; do not use to produce a missing discipline section, use the discipline skill that owns it. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

EpisodicRAG設定変更（対話的）

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

claude.ai セッション開始時に長期記憶をロードし、人格ディレクティブを適用する汎用エンジン。公開リポの記憶を Read token で SHA 固定取得し、必要時に Private リポを Read PAT で参照、記憶の書き戻しは PR フローで行う。リポ名・ファイル・commit identity・人格方針はすべて config から注入する。

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

EpisodicRAG初期セットアップ（対話的）

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

EpisodicRAG 健全性診断と階層推奨

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Deep reflection skill - read memory and context, decide whether there is something worth sending

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

从L2碎片中识别跨领域共同模式，提炼L1.5底层原则候选，经用户确认后写入原则库。触发词：「提炼原则」「有什么规律」「这些碎片有没有共性」「是不是反映了某个习惯」「总结一下模式」「有什么底层逻辑」。

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

后台认知合成器（DMN等效，Headless）。不被用户直接触发，由后台调度脚本每3天执行一次。跨碎片关联分析：找到不同时间捕捉的碎片之间的隐性关联，生成合成报告写入L3，等待daily-briefing展示给用户。触发词（人工触发时）：「执行后台合成」「cognitive-background-synthesizer」。

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

对认知结构运行完整的C1-C10一致性验证，输出验证报告并修复发现的不一致。触发词：「一致性检查」「自洽检查」「验证认知结构」「检查有没有问题」「跑一遍验证」。批量操作完成后自动触发。

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

生成今日认知系统汇报：整合L3记录、待完成项、知识库状态，并主动提问帮助用户恢复上下文。触发词：「汇报」「今天有什么」「有什么更新」「同步一下状态」「有什么积压」「今日简报」「最近新了什么」。

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

认知信号检测（突显网络 SN 等效）。检测当前对话内容中隐含的五类认知信号：S1洞见/S2跨域联想/S3矛盾/S4反思/S5原则印证。触发词：「检查这段话有没有认知信号」「帮我识别这里的洞见」「这段话有没有值得记录的」「cognitive-attend」「信号检测」「有什么值得深入的」。也可作为可选的对话预处理步骤（见集成说明）。

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

任意输入的路由分类器。在输入意图不明确时，判断应走「认知更新路径A（cognitive-capture-fragment）」还是「任务执行路径B（对应任务Skill）」，输出明确路由结论 + 判断理由，不自动触发下游。触发词：「帮我判断这是认知更新还是任务执行」「这个输入是什么类型」「先分类再执行」「路由分类一下」。不应触发：关于计算机网络路由算法的技术问题。

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

创造性发散（DMN+CEN协同等效）。遇到思路瓶颈时触发，从认知体系中随机抽取「表面不相关」的跨领域概念，强制寻找结构相似性，生成非常规解法候选列表。触发词：「没有思路」「换个角度想」「帮我发散一下」「有什么不同的方向」「反常识的方案」「跨领域看这个问题」「想不到解法」。

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

生成认知结构当前状态快照，帮助用户了解知识体系全貌并决定今日优先处理项。触发词：「大脑地图」「认知状态」「今天做什么」「复盘」「系统状态」「看一下状态」「有什么积压」。

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

从整个工作区出发，系统性地重组认知结构并整理全局文档归属。适用于首次建立认知结构、或积累了大量散落文档需要批量归档时。基于三大闭环框架（Loop1 Skill体系 / Loop2 思维体系 / Loop3 场景投射）做全工作区分类路由。触发词：「系统整理」「重组认知结构」「从文档构建认知结构」「整合文档」「全量梳理」「认知结构乱了」「全工作区整理」「文档归属梳理」「如何加入认知结构」「怎么加入认知结构」「按规范加入」「未更新的文档怎么处理」「这些文档要怎么整理」「有没有关于X的已有文档」。注意：若用户仅询问流程而非执行重组，执行 Step 0.5（检查分类清单现状）后，先向用户展示已有文档状态和分类建议，再确认是否执行完整重组。

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

将待整合的L2碎片通过小人机制整合进L1系统性文档，保持知识体系自洽。触发词：「整合碎片」「哪些碎片没整合」「更新文档」「把碎片整合进去」「处理积压」「消化碎片」。

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。