其他技能

Triage open Comet issues marked `requires-triage` per the project bug triage guide. Classifies each issue as a bug or an enhancement, applies the recommended type (`bug`/`enhancement`), priority, and area labels, removes `requires-triage`, and files a dated summary issue listing what was done. A human reviews the summary issue and closes it when satisfied.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when optimizing the performance of an existing native scalar expression in the datafusion-comet-spark-expr crate (native/spark-expr/) — casts, string/JSON/array/math kernels that run per-row or per-batch. Covers benchmarking, keeping output bit-identical, and the no-regression gate. Not for adding new expressions (use implement-comet-expression) or wiring upstream functions (use wire-datafusion-function).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Build a single C++ file. Use when a single .cc file needs to be compiled to check for errors.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use the Crabbox wrapper for OpenClaw remote validation across Linux, macOS, Windows, and WSL2, including delegated Blacksmith Testbox proof. Report the actual provider and id.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Convert English-language properties in PROPERTIES.md (produced by the Fizz skill) into Solidity assertions inside the existing fuzz harness, then flip their checkboxes. Trigger on "fizz-convert", "convert properties", "implement properties from PROPERTIES.md", "convert PROPERTIES.md to Solidity".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Merge origin/main into the working branch. Use when the brief skill is merge-main or the user wants latest main merged into a PR branch.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when writing the response to an American Anthropologist (AA) revise-and-resubmit. AA uses anonymous peer review under an ethics of care, often with cross-subfield reviewers, so the response must convert each reviewer while keeping the editor confident and the ethnographic contribution intact. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new evidence.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when building the conceptual/theoretical argument of an American Anthropologist (AA) manuscript into a four-field contribution — whether the work is ethnographic, archaeological, biological, or linguistic. AA rewards a portable concept and reflexive argument over a bare finding or thick description alone. Structures the argument; it does not run analyses or write fieldnotes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when responding to an American Economic Review: Insights (AER: Insights) conditional-accept decision — addressing the editor's letter within the short window, usually without a second referee round. Drafts a concise, decisive response and revision plan; it does not redo the analysis (see aeri-robustness / aeri-identification).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when drafting the response letter and revision plan after an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) R&R. Structures the reply to theory referees (correctness, generality, exposition) and editor; it does not re-derive the result (see aejmic-theory-model).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when the quantitative model is the bottleneck for an American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (AEJ: Macro) manuscript — DSGE, New Keynesian, heterogeneous-agent (HANK / Aiyagari-Bewley), or structural estimation — and calibration, parameter identification, solution accuracy, or counterfactual validity need discipline. For empirical shock identification see aejmac-identification.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when presenting results for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript — propositions, numerical examples, schematic theory figures, and empirical/experimental tables. Builds exhibits to AEA house norms; it does not derive the results (see aejmic-theory-model).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when extensions, edge cases, or applied robustness checks are missing for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) manuscript — covering theory extensions (relaxed assumptions, alternative concepts, perturbations) and applied/experimental robustness. Decides which extensions earn their place; it does not prove the main result (see aejmic-theory-model).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when revising prose, the abstract, or the introduction of an American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (AEJ: Macro) manuscript for AEA house style and the broad-interest macro arc. Late-stage polish on framing and clarity; it does not fix identification, the model, or exhibits.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when building or revising exhibits for an American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (AEJ: Macro) manuscript — impulse-response figures, fan charts, model-fit overlays, and regression/moment tables — to AEA house standards and macro conventions. Formatting and clarity; it does not generate the underlying estimates.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when writing the response to an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) revision decision. AgSy review is single anonymized with at least two expert systems reviewers and an editor decision, and revisions often turn on model evaluation, sensitivity/uncertainty, and trade-off framing. The response must convert each reviewer without alienating the editor. Structures the response letter; it does not fabricate new results.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when an American Economic Journal: Applied Economics (AEJ: Applied) manuscript's headline estimate must be shown to survive specification, sample, and inference choices before submission or in an R&R. Builds the robustness suite a sophisticated referee expects; it does not establish the primary identification (aeja-identification) or format the exhibits (aeja-tables-figures).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when understanding and navigating Administrative Science Quarterly's (ASQ) developmental, multi-round review process — decision types, reviewer/editor roles, and what each stage expects. Explains the process; it does not draft the response letter (see asq-rebuttal).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when deciding whether a materials result clears Advanced Materials' advance-and-broad-impact gate, or whether it belongs in Advanced Functional Materials, Advanced Science, Small, or Advanced Materials Interfaces. Diagnoses venue fit; does not write or characterize the material.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when polishing the prose of an Advanced Materials manuscript for Wiley house style, concision, precise materials nomenclature and units, and readability across materials subfields. Polishes language; does not restructure the advance or manage the length budget.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when responding to Advanced Materials reviewer reports and an editor's decision — major or minor revision, or a rejection with a resubmission or transfer path. Structures the response and the manuscript changes; does not perform the underlying new experiments.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript — fit, anonymization, format, exhibits, references, and the editorial-system submission. Checks readiness; it does not write or revise the manuscript.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when drafting the cover letter for an Advanced Materials submission, whose core job is to convince the editor that the work is a genuine materials advance of broad impact worthy of the journal. Argues the impact case; does not fix the science or format the manuscript.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Advanced Materials manuscript — article type, format, files, Supporting Information, TOC graphic, ORCID, and metadata for the Wiley submission system. Verifies submission readiness; does not write content.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。