调研、论文、教育、考证学习（4468 个）
Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section. Transforms your writing process from solo effort to collaborative partnership.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Comprehensive PET selection guide covering differential privacy, homomorphic encryption, secure multi-party computation, federated learning, zero-knowledge proofs, and trusted execution environments. Includes use-case matching matrix, performance comparison, and GDPR alignment assessment for each technology.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Implements HIPAA Privacy Rule requirements for research uses of protected health information under 45 CFR §164.512(i). Covers IRB and Privacy Board waivers of authorization, individual authorization for research, limited data set and data use agreements, preparatory to research provisions, and decedent research provisions. Keywords: HIPAA research, IRB waiver, Privacy Board, authorization, limited data set, preparatory research, de-identification, Common Rule.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Guide for managing consent for scientific research under GDPR Article 89 and Recital 33 broad consent provisions. Covers ethical review board coordination, purpose evolution management, appropriate safeguards including pseudonymization, and the interplay between consent and other lawful bases for research processing.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Implements federated learning architecture patterns for GDPR compliance. Covers secure aggregation protocols, differential privacy integration, communication protocols, and privacy-by-design distributed ML training. Keywords: federated learning, distributed training, secure aggregation, differential privacy, privacy-preserving ML.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
帮助学生在临考前进行结构化极速复习：解析课程资料/大纲/重点，按章节生成 wiki 知识库与标准题库，组织针对性刷题与判分，并记录复习进度和错题。当用户即将考试、需要快速复习计划、练习题、错题复盘或考前小抄时使用（关键词：期末/备考/复习/刷题/划重点/错题；exam, cram, study plan, quiz, review）。不适用于长期学习规划、与考试无关的写作或编程任务。
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
将已经讲完但尚未完成阶段门禁的一个章节整理成强类型教材清单，并在视觉模式下编译为公式可读、图片可见、知识点与全部对应例题逐项精讲的自包含 HTML/PDF。结构化工作区准备阶段完成证据、用户说 Markdown 公式仍是 raw LaTeX、图片缺失、要含课件/作业/Quiz/模拟考试题及答案的零基础讲义，或要求打印版时使用。
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
按章节惰性加载授课：每次只读当前阶段的一个 wiki 章节，用生活隐喻讲概念、解剖公式；重点题固定走 题面图→问题→读图量→公式→演算→答案详解→溯源七步，画图题先运行算法。用于讲懂当前章或老师勾出的重点题。
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Recover and review local human-AI conversations from Claude Code, Codex, opencode, Grok Build, and Cursor. Use when the user wants to revisit, search, extract, summarize, or compare work across Agent session stores, time ranges, projects, or named conversations. Follow the user's requested output; question clustering, problem-space mapping, artifact review, drift analysis, and insights are optional lenses.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Reconstruct and report long-running or multi-turn research, architecture questions, reviews, decisions, completion results, and status as a clear, self-contained brief. Use when a reader must re-enter earlier context, understand the real question and its relationships, distinguish verified facts from judgment and open evidence, or make a decision without reconstructing the work log. Quote the relevant original user wording before substantive analysis, keep one coherent main line, use spatial diagrams when relationships matter, and finish with an explicit decision boundary and practical next step.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Research why neural architectures and training methods work through forward computation, geometry, gradients, optimization dynamics, historical experiments, and competing explanations. Use for deep mechanism questions about neural networks, AI models, layers, representations, or training; explain the meaning in plain language with evidence and explicit limits.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Deeply research technical architecture, source code, mechanisms, SDKs, frameworks, project comparisons, and system-design options across repositories, history, official docs, issues, discussions, and high-quality community signals. Use when the user asks for deep research, source-level understanding, architecture comparison, mechanism satisfaction, or evidence for designing a system. Always map the question and obtain confirmation before beginning substantive research; skip for simple factual lookups or straightforward implementation tasks.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Turn a narration line, knowledge point, opinion, story beat, or abstract concept into a Seedance 2.0 editorial paper-collage clip with a clear visual metaphor, approved final composition, tactile stop-motion assembly, controlled paper texture, purposeful depth, and synchronized collage sound effects. Use for 4–15 second explainer or B-roll clips; not for realistic presenter ads or editable-layer delivery.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Design a Seedance 2.0 science, education, or general-knowledge explainer using layered handmade papercraft, miniature diorama depth, physical paper mechanisms, clear knowledge beats, restrained miniature camera, tactile sound, and stable reference roles. Use for one 4–15 second clip or a longer multi-clip plan; not for flat vector cartoons, live action, or paper-texture-only styling.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Source-backed research workflow for AI agents: scope, sources, claims, and task-appropriate Lite or Full checks.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use for source-backed research, analysis, report revision and updates. Understand the user's needs, follow their instructions and produce useful, well-reasoned results with methods and optional workflow tools.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Your personal DSA & LeetCode mentor. Use for problem explanations, progressive hints, code reviews, mock interviews, pattern recognition, complexity analysis, and custom problem generation. Automatically adapts to your learning style and request type.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Generate a self-contained, beautifully styled HTML analysis of an academic paper. Use when the user provides an arXiv link, paper URL, PDF, or asks to analyze a research paper. Produces a standalone HTML file with structured sections (Problem, Translation/Analogy, Architecture, Key Results, Verdict), embedded figures, and responsive design. Trigger words include 读论文, 分析论文, paper analysis, paper review.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Publication-figure overlay for draw.io. Use instead of drawio whenever the diagram is for a paper, thesis, dissertation, journal, conference, IEEE/ACM submission, manuscript, camera-ready, Word/LaTeX figure, or other publication. Applies venue, figure-type, color, caption/legend, formula, and paper-readability gates for architecture, workflow, roadmap, network-topology, and replicated paper figures.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Create, edit, replicate, import, and export draw.io diagrams with an offline YAML-first workflow: architecture, network topologies, flowcharts, UML/ER, org charts, Mermaid/CSV conversion, existing .drawio bundles, style presets, themes, and non-publication formula diagrams. For publication figures (paper, thesis, IEEE, camera-ready) use drawio-academic-skills instead.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
当用户纠结要不要学某个东西、学到什么程度，或在做时间/精力/项目取舍时使用。用「简易策略」先逼问要解决的既定问题，检验现有知识能否搞定，评估知识贬值速度与 ROI，用「探索 vs 应用」判断该学新的还是用现有的，给出「学 / 不学 / 只学最小够用」的结论，避免囤积会贬值的知识。触发场景：要不要学 X、值不值得深入、学到什么程度够、时间不够该学啥、该深挖还是够用就行。
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
当用户要系统学一个新领域、不知道从哪入手、或担心「学得不够系统」时使用。用「知识图谱学习法」和用户一起构建该领域的概念/用途/父子节点图谱（自己建图的过程本身就是学习），标出复用价值最高的节点和「从常识就能入门的点」，给出有效学习路径并回答「学到哪算够」。触发场景：系统学 X 领域、从哪开始学、学得不系统、想要 X 的全貌、规划学习路径、这个领域有多大。
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when 用户想以一对一苏格拉底导师的方式系统学习一个课题——开一门新课、推进课题的下一篇、提交学习反馈或说「我读完了」、或整理/查看学习日志。基于 Bloom 2 Sigma 的交互式学习系统。触发词：开个文件夹学X、我想学X、帮我学X、继续、下一篇、我读完了、整理学习、查看学习日志、interactive Socratic tutoring、Bloom 2 sigma learning。
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
当用户学习或接触一个新概念/新技术/新算法/新领域时使用（尤其感到陌生或有点难时）。用「跨界原则」拿用户已掌握的知识快速撬动新知识——指出他其实已经学过的同一个东西（换了名字）、结构同构的旧知识、能解释新知识的已有知识，并点出新概念体现的跨领域元知识模式。让「学新东西」变成「发现你已经会了一半」。触发场景：学 X、接触 X、这个好难、X 是什么、帮我理解 X。
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。