测试与安全技能

Audit a content library, docs site, or blog for AI-generated filler that's eroding trust and search performance — and triage what to fix, rewrite, or delete. Use when asked to find slop in a content library, audit AI-written content quality, explain why content engagement or rankings dropped after scaling with AI, or set a quality bar for AI-assisted publishing. Produces an audited inventory with per-piece verdicts, the detection signals used, a triage plan, and a publishing quality gate that prevents recurrence. For a single article's AI-citability use aeo-optimizer; for the strategy itself use content-calendar or seo-content-brief.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Optimize an article for Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) so AI engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Claude can extract, quote, and cite it. Use when asked to AEO-optimize, make content AI-readable, improve AI citation chances, or adapt an article for answer engines. Produces an AEO-optimised rewrite with question headings, 50–80 word answer capsules, a paragraph-length audit, and flagged trust signals.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Audit whether AI agents can actually use your product — docs, APIs, onboarding, errors, and discoverability, evaluated from a non-human user's perspective. Use when asked if a product is agent-ready, to audit a site or API for AI usability, to prepare for agentic traffic, or when agents keep failing against your product. Produces a scored readiness report with per-surface findings and a prioritised fix list. For optimising a single article for AI citation use aeo-optimizer; for designing the MCP server itself use mcp-server-spec.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Generate a WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit checklist and remediation suggestions for any UI or design. Use when asked to audit for accessibility, check WCAG compliance, review a design for a11y issues, or create an accessibility remediation plan. Produces a prioritised checklist with pass/fail assessments and specific fixes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Analyse a finished A/B test and write the readout — the result, whether it's statistically and practically significant, what it means, and the ship/no-ship call. Use when asked to analyse experiment results, write an A/B test readout, interpret test data, or decide whether to ship a variant. Produces a clear verdict with the lift and confidence, segment cuts, the risks (peeking, novelty, sample), and a recommendation. Distinct from planning a test — this reads results.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Make an AI agent or automation reliable enough to trust — the tests, checks, and guardrails that catch its failures before they reach anything real. Use when asked how do I test my AI agent, make my automation reliable, my agent works sometimes, or how do I trust an AI workflow in production. Produces a map of where the agent can fail (bad input, hallucination, wrong tool call, edge cases, silent errors), the checks that catch each (validation, evals on real cases, human-in-the-loop gates, monitoring), a right-sized reliability plan scaled to the stakes, and a rollout that earns trust incrementally.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Audit whether the organisation's AI spend actually paid — measured against baselines, not vendor math or vibes. Use when a CFO asks what the AI tools returned, when renewing AI contracts, when consolidating overlapping AI subscriptions, or to build the measurement plan before the next spend. Produces an ROI audit with per-tool verdicts (keep/consolidate/cut), the honest-measurement method behind each number, and a baseline plan for whatever can't be scored yet. To forecast ROI before an investment use roi-estimator; this skill measures what already happened.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Conduct a structured ethical review of an AI or ML feature, model, or product. Use when preparing to deploy an AI system, assessing algorithmic risk, auditing a model for bias, or producing a responsible AI impact assessment. Produces a structured ethics review covering fairness, transparency, privacy, safety, accountability, and societal impact with a risk tier score, pre-deployment checklist, and prioritised mitigations.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Design statistically rigorous A/B tests for product features, UI changes, onboarding flows, and pricing experiments. Use when asked to set up an experiment, design an A/B test, calculate sample size, or interpret test results. Produces a complete test plan with hypothesis, variant definitions, sample size, duration estimate, guardrail metrics, and a results interpretation guide.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Audit one, several, or all existing Octane bindings; implement selected maintenance findings or remove redundant copied files with evidence matched to source ownership. Use for binding updates, lifecycle fixes, dependency or metadata maintenance, and convenience-import requests.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Audit or defend Octane performance. Use when a change can affect per-render, per-node, scheduling, compiler-output, SSR, hydration, or bundle cost, or when asked whether something is fast enough. Holds the V8-shape, DOM, and scheduling rules hot-path code must follow.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Find and fix a bug in the octane monorepo. Use when given a failing test, a regression, or a report that behavior differs from expectation, including deciding whether a React mismatch is an intentional divergence.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Intelligent loading performance analysis with automated workflows for TTFB investigation (DNS/connection/server breakdown), render-blocking detection, script performance deep dive (first vs third-party attribution), font optimization, and resource hints validation. Includes decision trees that automatically analyze TTFB sub-parts when slow, detect script loading anti-patterns (async/defer/preload conflicts), identify render-blocking resources, and validate resource hints usage. Features workflows for complete loading audit (6 phases), backend performance investigation, and priority optimization. Cross-skill integration with Core Web Vitals (LCP resource loading), Interaction (script execution blocking), and Media (lazy loading strategy). Use when the user asks about TTFB, FCP, render-blocking, slow loading, font performance, script optimization, or resource hints. Compatible with Chrome DevTools MCP.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Intelligent media optimization with automated workflows for images, videos, and SVGs. Includes decision trees that detect LCP images (triggers format/lazy-loading/priority analysis), identify layout shift risks (missing dimensions), and flag lazy loading issues (above-fold lazy or below-fold eager). Features workflows for complete media audit, LCP image investigation, video performance (poster optimization), and SVG embedded bitmap detection. Cross-skill integration with Core Web Vitals (LCP/CLS impact) and Loading (priority hints, resource preloading). Provides performance budgets and format recommendations based on content type. Use when the user asks about image optimization, LCP is an image/video, layout shifts from media, or media loading strategy. Compatible with Chrome DevTools MCP.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Intelligent interaction performance analysis with automated workflows for INP debugging, scroll jank investigation, and main thread blocking. Includes decision trees that automatically run script attribution when long frames detected, break down input latency phases, and correlate layout shifts with interactions. Features workflows for complete interaction audit, third-party script impact analysis, and animation performance debugging. Cross-skill integration with Core Web Vitals (INP/CLS correlation) and Loading (script execution analysis). Use when the user asks about slow interactions, janky scrolling, unresponsive pages, or INP optimization. Compatible with Chrome DevTools MCP.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Web performance measurement and debugging toolkit. Use when the user asks about web performance, wants to audit a page, or says "analyze performance", "debug lcp", "check ttfb", "measure core web vitals", "audit images", or similar.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Help users de-risk new product bets by testing core assumptions, building low-fidelity prototypes, and gathering high-signal evidence before investing heavy engineering resources.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Design assertions that prove the actual contract and fail on realistic regressions

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Interactive workflow partner for creating, testing, and improving AI agent skills with waza. USE FOR: run my evals, check my skill, compare models, create eval suite, debug failing tests, is my skill ready, ship readiness, interpret results, improve score. DO NOT USE FOR: general coding, non-skill work, writing skill content (use skill-authoring), improving frontmatter only (use sensei).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Run evaluations on Agent Skills to measure their effectiveness. USE FOR: "run skill evals", "evaluate my skill", "test skill quality", "check skill triggers", "skill compliance check", "measure skill performance", "run evals on [skill-name]", "grade skill execution". DO NOT USE FOR: writing skills (use skill-authoring), improving frontmatter (use sensei), or general testing unrelated to skills.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

**WORKFLOW SKILL** - Evaluate AI agent skills using structured benchmarks with YAML specs, fixture isolation, and pluggable validators. USE FOR: run waza, waza help, run eval, run benchmark, evaluate skill, test agent, generate eval suite, init eval, compare results, score agent, agent evaluation, skill testing, cross-model comparison. DO NOT USE FOR: improving skill frontmatter (use waza dev), creating new skills from scratch (use skill-creator), token counting or budget checks (use waza tokens). INVOKES: Copilot SDK executor, mock engine, code/regex validators. FOR SINGLE OPERATIONS: use waza run directly for a single benchmark.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Generate pytest tests for Typer CLI commands. Includes fixtures (temp_storage, sample_data), CliRunner patterns, confirmation handling (y/n/--force), and edge case coverage. Use when user asks to "write tests for", "test my CLI", "add test coverage", or any CLI + test request.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Generate educational practice questions from lecture notes to test student understanding. Use when users request practice questions, exam preparation materials, study guides, or assessment items based on lecture content.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use Gentle AI harness discipline for Pi work: clarify first, track ODD work, use applicable test-first development by default, delegate when useful, and protect review workload.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。