跳到正文
cccskills

写作与创作技能

小说、剧本、博客、润色、校对(1825 个)

按价格或排序方式筛选

Use when deciding whether an anthropology project fits American Anthropologist (AA) and which section to target. AA is the four-field AAA flagship, so the test is significance across anthropology (sociocultural, archaeology, biological, linguistic), not single-subfield novelty. Helps frame the question and pick a section; it does not collect data or conduct fieldwork.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills12882026年9月27日 更新

geology

免费

Use when targeting Geology (GSA) or deciding whether a short, high-impact geoscience research letter fits this venue. Encodes the journal's broad-significance-in-tight-length fit, the novelty and rapid-communication bar, GSA house style, official-submission re-check, and desk-reject heuristics.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills12882026年9月27日 更新

Use for full-manuscript prose and narrative craft on an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript — voice, structure, and the storytelling ASQ is known for. Polishes the writing; it does not change the theory or analysis.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills12882026年9月27日 更新

Use when you need to understand the Academy of Management Review (AMR) developmental, multi-round review and interpret a decision letter focused on theoretical novelty and logical soundness. Explains the process and decision types; it does NOT draft the response document (that is amr-rebuttal).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills12882026年9月27日 更新

Use when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills12882026年9月27日 更新

Use when revising an AAAI manuscript for broad-AI-audience fit, a first-page contribution statement legible to non-specialist Phase-1 reviewers, two-column readability, concise novelty claims, reproducibility-checklist alignment, hedged limitations and ethics, and policy-aware framing of AI-system and capability claims.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills12882026年9月27日 更新

Use when building the novel integrative framework that an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review must deliver — the theory-advancing "new way of seeing the field" that is the acceptance bar, not a catalog of papers. Designs the spine; it does not gather the literature (amann-literature-synthesis) or appraise evidence balance (amann-evidence-standards).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills12882026年9月27日 更新

x-ray

免费

Generates an x-ray.md pre-audit report covering overview, enhanced threat model (protocol-type profiling, git-weighted attack surfaces, temporal risk analysis, composability dependency mapping), invariants, integrations, docs quality, test analysis, and developer/git history. Triggers on 'x-ray', 'audit readiness', 'readiness report', 'pre-audit report', 'prep this protocol', 'protocol prep', 'summarize this protocol'.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

pashov/skills12822026年10月21日 更新

Review generated or changed documentation before it ships — READMEs, API references, docstrings, PHPDoc/JSDoc, changelogs, tutorials, and doc sites. Best used reactively after an agent writes or edits docs, after code changes documented behavior, or before publishing docs. Use when the user says 'review the docs', 'is this documentation accurate', 'update the docs', 'write a README', 'document this API', 'add a docstring', or 'add a changelog entry'. Core job: verify every referenced function, flag, endpoint, config key, and code sample against the source; catch docs-vs-code drift; strip filler and unverifiable claims. DO NOT USE for production code review (use clean-code-guard), test review (use test-guard), marketing copy or blog posts, prose style editing of non-technical writing, or documentation site theming.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

amElnagdy/guard-skills12782026年7月5日 更新

Map complete topic clusters for any subject area — hub pages, spoke articles, supporting content, internal linking architecture. Identifies content gaps, priority order, and builds a structured content calendar. Produces topic maps that build genuine topical authority, not random blog posts.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12632026年10月22日 更新

End-to-end leadership change signal composite. Takes any set of companies, detects recent leadership changes (new VP+, C-suite hires and promotions), evaluates relevance to your product, and drafts personalized outreach. Uses Apollo People Search (free) for fast detection + Apollo Enrichment (1 credit/person) for employment history, start dates, LinkedIn URLs, and verified emails.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12632026年10月22日 更新

Scrape blog posts via RSS feeds (free, no API key) with Apify fallback for JS-heavy sites. Use when you need to monitor competitor blogs, track industry content, or aggregate blog posts by keyword.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12632026年10月22日 更新

Evaluate YC batch companies for investment — scrapes the YC directory, researches each company and its founders (work history, LinkedIn, website), assesses founder-company fit, and exports to Google Sheets with priority rankings. Use when asked to evaluate YC companies, research a YC batch, screen startups, or do due diligence on YC companies.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12632026年10月22日 更新

End-to-end news-triggered signal composite. Takes any piece of news — an article, LinkedIn post, tweet, announcement, event, trend, regulation, product launch, acquisition, layoff, expansion, or any other public event — and evaluates whether the companies or people mentioned are ICP fits. If yes, identifies the connection between the news and your product, finds the right people to contact, and drafts personalized outreach using the news as the hook. Tool-agnostic. Accepts both company-level and person-level news triggers. AUTO-TRIGGER: Load this composite whenever a user shares a URL (LinkedIn post, article, tweet, blog post) or mentions a company/person they "came across", "saw", or "found" from any external source and asks about relevance, fit, ICP match, or whether to reach out. The user does NOT need to explicitly say "outreach" — any signal evaluation request from an external source triggers this.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12632026年10月22日 更新

Look up information about a person - work history, social profiles, contact info

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12632026年10月22日 更新

Take raw customer inputs — interview transcripts, survey responses, Slack quotes, support tickets, review excerpts — and generate a structured case study draft with problem/solution/result narrative, pull-quotes, metric callouts, and multi-format outputs (full case study, one-pager, social proof snippet, sales deck slide). Pure reasoning skill. Use when a product marketing team has customer signal but no time to write the story.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12632026年10月22日 更新

Creates a new graphics format spec (custom canvas dimensions + content rules) and publishes it to the Gooseworks library so any agent can render against it. Use when the existing community formats (carousel, story, infographic, slides, poster, chart, tweet, plus community additions) don't fit the user's canvas — e.g., LinkedIn banner 1584×396, story cover 1080×1920, event flyer 8.5×11in. Mirrors goose-graphics-create-style but for formats.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12632026年10月22日 更新

Find company funding history, investors, and investment details

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

gooseworks-ai/goose-skills12632026年10月22日 更新

Use when capturing or analyzing an iOS .memgraph, especially when the task mentions a memory leak, heap growth, persistent memory increase, ownership path, or matched-capture comparison with Apple CLI tools. Covers unambiguous Simulator capture, leaks/heap/vmmap/malloc_history evidence, raw artifact preservation, and same-flow verification. Use debugging-instruments for interactive Xcode Memory Graph, Instruments, generic retain-cycle inspection, or LLDB work.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

dpearson2699/swift-ios-skills12272026年8月1日 更新

Discovers, classifies, filters, and quantifies full-length transcript isoforms from PacBio Iso-Seq/Kinnex (HiFi) and Oxford Nanopore (cDNA/direct-RNA) long reads, using the isoseq+pigeon pipeline, SQANTI3, and ONT tools (IsoQuant, FLAIR, Bambu, StringTie2). Covers why a novel isoform is an artifact until proven otherwise (RT template-switching, intra-priming, and 5' degradation manufacture junctions and truncations), the SQANTI3 structural categories and their trust order, the Kinnex skera-split step, orthogonal CAGE/poly-A/short-read-junction validation, and why long-read isoform quantification needs EM. Use when building a full-length isoform catalog, classifying/filtering long-read transcripts, running Iso-Seq or ONT cDNA/dRNA analysis, or judging novel-isoform reliability.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

GPTomics/bioSkills12272026年8月15日 更新

Tests genotype-environment associations and identifies adaptive loci while correcting for the four-confound landscape (structure, demography, background selection, sampling design) using LFMM2 with mandatory K via sNMF cross-entropy elbow (LEA 3), BayPass Core/AUX/C2/IS with Omega covariance matrix, RDA / pRDA for polygenic adaptation (Forester 2018; requires imputed genotypes), OutFLANK with trimmed FST null, pcadapt, gradient forests (Ellis-Smith-Pitcher 2012, NOT mis-cited Ellis-Manel), Capblancq & Forester 2021 RDA Swiss-army-knife, genomic-offset prediction with Lind & Lotterhos 2025 three-regime caveat, Lotterhos-Whitlock sampling optima, Wang & Bradburd 2014 IBD vs IBE, and Circuitscape + ResistanceGA. Use when identifying adaptive loci across gradients, choosing K for LFMM2, deciding among GEA methods, predicting maladaptation with the novel-environment caveat, distinguishing IBD vs IBE, or optimizing sampling design.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

GPTomics/bioSkills12272026年8月15日 更新

Assesses genetic health of populations for conservation with Ne estimation across time horizons (LDNe NeEstimator V2 option-file API + SNeP physical-linkage correction; recent trajectory via GONE/GONE2; deep history via Stairway Plot 2 / dadi / fastsimcoal2 / PSMC), F-statistics, runs of homozygosity binned by length class to date inbreeding, genetic-load decomposition (Bertorelle 2022 realized vs masked), the modern 100/1000 Ne rule (Frankham 2014), Ne/Nc 2-6 orders of magnitude in marine fish (Hauser & Carvalho 2008), tree-sequence forward simulations (SLiM 4 + pyslim + tskit), and the Sukumaran-Knowles caveat against MSC methods for management-unit definition. Use when estimating Ne by time horizon, detecting inbreeding via F_ROH, decomposing genetic load, justifying conservation thresholds, distinguishing ESU/MU/DPS, configuring NeEstimator V2, or correcting LDNe physical linkage.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

GPTomics/bioSkills12272026年8月15日 更新

Runs JACKS (Joint Analysis of CRISPR/Cas9 Knockout Screens; Allen et al 2019 Genome Research) which models per-sgRNA log-fold-change as the product of a treatment-dependent gene-essentiality term and a treatment-independent guide-efficacy term. Covers the Bayesian decomposition math, the hierarchical efficacy prior shared across screens performed with the same library, when JACKS outperforms MAGeCK (multi-screen joint analysis, libraries with broad efficacy variance) and when it does not (single screen, novel libraries with no prior efficacy), library-reuse efficacy transfer, downstream essentiality interpretation, and the 2.5x sample-size reduction enabled by efficacy-aware testing. Use when running multiple screens with the same library, when guide-level noise is suspected to dominate per-gene signal, when reusing published essentiality reference screens for efficacy priors, or when comparing screens performed across cell lines that share library but differ biologically.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

GPTomics/bioSkills12272026年8月15日 更新

Assesses RNA-seq data quality specifically for alternative splicing analysis. QC layers include experimental design audit (library prep, read length, depth, replicates), STAR 2-pass cohort-style alignment, junction saturation curves and discovery plateau detection, novel-vs-known junction ratio diagnostics, junction-overhang distribution, splice-site strength scoring (MaxEntScan intrinsic + SpliceAI context-aware), strandedness verification, GENCODE basic vs comprehensive choice, and rRNA contamination screening. Splicing analysis is more demanding than DGE on read length, depth, library prep, alignment strategy, and annotation choice — failures silently bias PSI estimates and inflate novel-junction false positives. Use when evaluating data suitability for splicing analysis, troubleshooting low event detection, or designing sequencing experiments where AS is a primary endpoint.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

GPTomics/bioSkills12272026年8月15日 更新