Guides authoring, organizing, and referencing test fixtures in this repo. Use when creating new fixtures, writing tests that depend on fixtures, or deciding what should be checked into git. Engine fixtures (rendering corpora) live in the engine repo.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Work on Grida's Gateway product consumer, scoped native AI tokens, installed gg provider and Desktop integration. Use for product execution adapters, not standalone Gateway service implementation or billing policy.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Guides work on the Grida file format (.grida) from the TS side: the I/O packages that read/write it (loading, archive packing, clipboard) and the frozen schema bindings. Use when working with .grida files in the editor or packages, or debugging format round-trip issues. (The schema and the Rust decoder live in the engine repo.)
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Pre-PR discipline for a public-by-default repo. What a reviewer enforces beyond CI: secrets and internal data in diffs or screenshots, docs that name their reader, and the cleaning pass where incomplete or confusing artifacts get dropped. Use before opening any PR against `gridaco/grida` or when finalizing work for review.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Role profile — a reviewer who is fact-seeking, bedrock-seeking, honest, and rejecting. Demands that arguments rest on small facts that cannot be wrong (not on stacked assumptions dressed up as foundation), and that deliberately-unclear concepts be quarantined — never leaked into solid layers, never mixed with each other. Catches the failure mode where designs ship after partial grounding: most of the spec researched, the design feels finished, and the unresearched remainder holds the deal-breaker. Invoke with `/pedantic <target>` (e.g. `/pedantic review this design doc`, `/pedantic review the SDK design`, `/pedantic review this PR`). Probes cover logical structure (definitions, assumptions, boundaries, contradictions, unfalsifiability, vague quantifiers, counterexamples), epistemic honesty (researchable vs. discoverable-only-by-doing), bedrock integrity (assumed-bedrock, leaked uncertainty, mixed unclarity), and design pathology (YAGNI, wrong-layer abstraction, unclear responsibility, fragmentation, over-engineering). Use when you want a hard critique of a plan, design doc, technical doc, code change, or PR description — not a copy edit, not a vibe check.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Discipline for the seam between two SDKs (or two sides of one contract) that the same hand writes. The failure mode: "we own both sides" produces dirty contracts no foreign reviewer would accept. The exercise: pretend the other side is FFI, IPC, or a network protocol you cannot rewrite. Spawn an adversarial subagent profiled as the producer's maintainer; negotiate the change as a feature request, not a PR. Companion to $sdk-design. Language-agnostic — applies to a TS package + its consumer, a Rust crate + its WASM binding, two services sharing a wire format, or any other boundary the same author writes both ends of.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Establish what is actually true and current for the surface you are about to change — not just search. Grounding = locate the authoritative source and reconcile sources that disagree (code vs doc, migration vs schema, memory vs current code, live vs archived), not take the first hit. Use before any grep/find/explore of the codebase or docs, when deciding which of several definitions is the real one, or when a doc or memory conflicts with the code. Covers the source-of-truth hierarchy, reconciliation discipline, scoped ripgrep, and the docs/tags.yml + docsearch.py index.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Author and edit `.svg` files in a Grida editor session — live-canvas binding, SVG output style, and parse-error recovery. Use when creating or modifying an SVG document.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。