281 个（Jamie-BitFlight 的仓库） · 按人气排序
Use when building CLI applications with Typer — creating commands, defining arguments and options with enum restrictions, path validation, date and UUID types, composing subcommands, testing with CliRunner, or using advanced features like colored output, progress bars, shell autocompletion, and version callbacks.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Routes Python engineering tasks to specialist skills by matching trigger patterns before any architecture, plan, or code is written. Use when working with Typer CLI frameworks, Rich or Textual terminal UIs, CLI UI/UX design, questionary prompts, FastMCP/MCP servers, ty type checker, uv package manager, Hatchling build backend, TOML editing, pre-commit/prek hooks, async Python, PyPI packaging, complex linting, technical debt modernization, testing workflows, feature development, or stdlib-only scripting.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Guides pytest test architecture for Python 3.11+ using behavioral contracts, risk, and maintenance-adjusted value. Use when choosing unit/integration/property/e2e boundaries, fixture strategy, coverage measurement, or mutation testing. Preserves existing project gates but does not invent test-pyramid ratios, coverage percentages, mutation-score targets, or tests for implementation detail.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Activates on any Python task involving *.py files, uv, ruff, ty, pytest, or pyproject.toml — loads the shared Python 3.11+ standards and routes the task to the specialist skill that applies them: TDD, CLI, web, data, async, typing, packaging, publishing, documentation sites, test design, test-failure analysis, or stdlib-only constrained environments.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Pytest testing patterns for Python — fixtures, behavioral naming, behavior/risk-driven coverage, property-based testing with Hypothesis when useful, and mutation testing when justified. Use when writing tests, designing fixtures, configuring coverage, or applying parametrize, async testing, or property-based strategies.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Analyze, improve, or represent processes across a file or directory by delegating to process-siren. Uses the same semantic model and validation loop as single-process work; Mermaid is produced when it is the useful concise representation.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Executes a four-phase feature addition workflow (Discovery, Planning, TDD Implementation, Verification) for Python projects. Use when adding a new feature end-to-end — discovering project structure and integration points, drafting a feature spec with MoSCoW-prioritized requirements and BDD acceptance criteria, implementing via test-first TDD cycles, then verifying with ruff lint, ty type checks, and behavior-focused regression and contract coverage.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when building dependency-free Python 3.11+ scripts for airgapped, stdlib-only, or restricted environments where third-party package installation is prohibited — triggers on "stdlib-only", "airgapped", "no dependencies", "no internet", "restricted environment", or confirmed environments where external packages cannot be installed.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Auto-selects and enforces the strongest valid Python typing lane for the detected Python version and dependencies — no user input required. Use when adding or tightening type annotations, eliminating Any usage in internal code, designing boundary validators or parsers, choosing between stdlib typing (TypedDict, Protocol, dataclasses), Pydantic models, or Hypothesis property tests, addressing ty or mypy failures, or applying version-specific features (TypeIs, ReadOnly, PEP 695 generics, PEP 649 deferred evaluation). Enforces boundary isolation — raw payloads validated immediately at ingress and returned as typed internal objects.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Investigate pytest failures without treating tests or implementation as automatic authority. Use when diagnosing regressions, debugging test errors, or deciding whether to fix a test or code; trace the contract, product, fixture, and observation before choosing an evidence-backed correction.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Validate a completed plugin refactor against its task evidence, baseline assessment, documentation, and current validators. Use after implement-refactor or when deciding whether refactoring is complete.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Store instructional prose once and reference it from multiple skills or agents instead of duplicating it. Use when the same steps, rules, or reference material appear in two or more SKILL.md or agent files in one plugin, when deciding whether a shared doc belongs in the plugin-root docs directory or a single skill's references directory, or when tempted to use a symlink or a ../ path to share a file between components.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Start a complete plugin refactoring workflow that analyzes plugin structure, creates a refactoring plan with tasks, and guides through execution. Use when you need to refactor an entire plugin — triggers assessment, design, planning, and parallel agent execution phases.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Optimize CLAUDE.md files and Skills for Claude Code CLI. Use when reviewing, creating, or improving system prompts, CLAUDE.md configurations, or Skill files. Transforms negative instructions into positive patterns following Anthropic's official best practices.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Assess a plugin and produce an executable refactoring design, task plan, and context manifest. Use when preparing systematic plugin refactoring.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Format and score completed plugin assessment findings, including whether evidence admits a finding to the requested outcome. Use when a plugin assessment or review needs the standard report structure, scoring criteria, severity breakdown, marketplace-readiness result, or finding admission.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Analysis criteria, transformation patterns, output format, and validation checklist for refactoring Claude Code agent prompt files. Load this skill when preparing to run the subagent-refactorer agent or when reviewing agent prompt files for structural, model optimization, or instruction quality improvements.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Plugin creator documentation index. Load when needing to read about plugin validation error codes, skill creation, agent creation, or plugin structure.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Compatibility router for skill goal recovery and authority assessment. Delegate to Skill Lapidary's establish-validatable-goals capability rather than maintaining a second goal-contract system in Plugin Creator.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Write or tighten the description field of a skill or agent so the right one loads. Use when creating a skill or agent, when a description is vague, bloated, or missing triggers, when YAML multiline or quoting breaks the frontmatter, or when choosing between a model-invoked and a user-invoked skill.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Start or complete a specific refactoring task from a task file. Use when a sub-agent needs to pick up a refactoring task, update its status, implement acceptance criteria, and run verification steps.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Sync a skill's content against the upstream library it covers — check whether the API descriptions, version references, and SOURCE: citations inside SKILL.md and its reference files still reflect what the library actually does today. Use when a library has released updates that may have changed the APIs the skill covers, when a skill references an old library version, when asked to sync, refresh, update, or check a skill against upstream docs, when the skill's content may have drifted from current library behavior, or when SOURCE: citations are stale. Accepts a SKILL.md path, skill directory, or plugin directory.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "validate Perl script", "check Perl syntax", "verify Perl code", "/perl-validate", or mentions script validation, compile check, security review, or best practice compliance for Perl code.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Assess and refactor oversized or multi-domain skills. First determines whether splitting or references/ extraction is appropriate — then executes the correct action. Use when a skill exceeds token thresholds (SK006/SK007) or covers multiple independent domains. Performs candidate assessment before any structural changes; cohesive single-intent skills are redirected to references/ extraction instead of splitting. When splitting is warranted — domain analysis gate, split plan, new SKILL.md generation, validation, and backwards-compatible facade conversion.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。