Detects and fixes color contrast violations using WCAG 2.1 guidelines and perceptual analysis. Expert in contrast ratio calculation, color blindness simulation, and providing accessible alternatives. Activate on "check contrast", "color accessibility", "WCAG audit", "readability check", "contrast ratio", "hard to read", "can't see text". NOT for general color theory (use color-theory-palette-harmony-expert), brand color selection (use web-design-expert), or non-visual accessibility (use ux-friction-analyzer).
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
curiositech/port-daddy☆ 32026年10月19日 更新
Content quality and E-E-A-T analysis with AI citation readiness assessment. Use when user says "content quality", "E-E-A-T", "content analysis", "readability check", "thin content", or "content audit".
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
balsm-health/website☆ 32026年10月18日 更新
Comprehensive Power BI DAX formula optimization prompt for improving performance, readability, and maintainability of DAX calculations.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
jcasnellie69/homelab-config☆ 22026年10月16日 更新
Complete guide for AutoFixture and xUnit integration. Use when you need to use AutoData or InlineAutoData to simplify xUnit parameterized test data preparation. Covers custom Customization and test data attributes to improve test readability and maintainability. Keywords: AutoData, InlineAutoData, AutoFixture xUnit, [AutoData], [InlineAutoData], AutoDataAttribute, ICustomization, DataAttribute, parameterized test, Theory AutoData, MemberAutoData, test data attributes, fixture.Customize
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
rudironsoni/Synaxis☆ 22026年3月17日 更新
Simplify a bounded code area when the user explicitly requests behavior-preserving refactoring or a named complexity/readability problem is the accepted task; do not trigger automatically after implementation, during every review, for adjacent cleanup, or when behavior may change.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Rosetears520/aili-workflows☆ 22026年9月27日 更新
Penetration test and red team report writing methodology. Covers executive summary structuring (risk-led narrative for non-technical readers), technical finding format (title, severity, affected scope, narrative, reproduction steps, impact, remediation, references), CVSS v3.1 / v4.0 scoring with vector justification, OWASP risk rating, evidence hygiene (redacting credentials, hashing client data, time-stamping every action), screenshot and PoC artifact management, finding chain narratives, scope/limitations/assumptions documentation, retest evidence and remediation tracking, deliverable formats (PDF, DOCX, HTML, JSON for SIEM ingestion), client-customer-deliverable separation, and common report mistakes (over-CVSSing, undermining the triager, missing the 'so what'). Use at the end of an engagement when authoring a deliverable, when restructuring a draft for executive readability, or when establishing a reusable report template for a consulting practice.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
ajtazer/heckit☆ 22026年10月7日 更新