“lua”的搜索结果

Use when measuring or improving agent quality and performance — set up evaluators, online monitoring, CI/CD quality gates, observability, or cost optimization. Triggers on: "evaluate my agent", "add evaluator", "measure quality", "quality gate", "run evals", "agent too slow", "why is it slow", "reduce latency", "set up observability", "CloudWatch dashboard", "how much does my agent cost", "cost optimization", "logs not showing up", "logs missing", "spans not found", "eval failing", "eval error", "dev traces", "local traces", "agentcore dev traces", "traces to CloudWatch". Not for debugging errors or crashes — use agents-debug. Slow but correct routes here; broken routes to debug.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Structure and debug a LÖVE (Love2D) game in Lua: the love.load/update/draw loop, delta-time movement, input, and screen states. Use when building a LÖVE 11.x game (main.lua, conf.lua, .love).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Script a Roblox experience in Luau: get services, create and parent Instances, connect events, run server Scripts vs client LocalScripts, and communicate across the client/server boundary with RemoteEvents/RemoteFunctions (server-authoritative). Use when building or debugging Roblox Studio scripts — when the user mentions Roblox, Luau, services, RemoteEvent, Instance.new, PlayerAdded, or client vs server. For saving player data use roblox-datastores.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Implement comprehensive evaluation strategies for LLM applications using automated metrics, human feedback, and benchmarking. Use when testing LLM performance, measuring AI application quality, or establishing evaluation frameworks.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Design evaluation datasets and supporting documentation for AI systems and agents, covering the scoping interview, difficulty distribution, dataset contract, sample review, and metric and tooling selection. Use when building or reviewing an evaluation set for a conversational agent, assistant, or retrieval-grounded AI system.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Guides evaluation of RAG pipeline retrieval and generation quality. Use when evaluating a retrieval-augmented generation system, measuring retrieval quality, assessing generation faithfulness or relevance, generating synthetic QA pairs for retrieval testing, or optimizing chunking strategies.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

**WORKFLOW SKILL** - Evaluate AI agent skills using structured benchmarks with YAML specs, fixture isolation, and pluggable validators. USE FOR: run waza, waza help, run eval, run benchmark, evaluate skill, test agent, generate eval suite, init eval, compare results, score agent, agent evaluation, skill testing, cross-model comparison. DO NOT USE FOR: improving skill frontmatter (use waza dev), creating new skills from scratch (use skill-creator), token counting or budget checks (use waza tokens). INVOKES: Copilot SDK executor, mock engine, code/regex validators. FOR SINGLE OPERATIONS: use waza run directly for a single benchmark.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Evaluate YC batch companies for investment — scrapes the YC directory, researches each company and its founders (work history, LinkedIn, website), assesses founder-company fit, and exports to Google Sheets with priority rankings. Use when asked to evaluate YC companies, research a YC batch, screen startups, or do due diligence on YC companies.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Capture and review Agent Skill observations, and create, run, diagnose, or iteratively improve Skill evaluations (evals) with the skill-up CLI. Use when the user asks to record explicitly attributed Skill usage or feedback; review observations or user-supplied traces/transcripts; turn an approved observation into a regression case; evaluate, test, regress, verify, fix, improve, iterate, or evolve a Skill; add or strengthen eval cases; write eval.yaml/case.yaml; run skill-up run/validate/list-cases/report/import/init; or migrate from Anthropic evals.json. Plugin observation capture/review require either the Codex skill-up plugin or an observer-enabled DSH skill-up plugin. User-supplied external evidence can be reviewed without a plugin; evaluation remains multi-engine.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Evaluate an AI workflow against representative cases and its permitted actions. Use for model, retrieval or agent evaluation; tests do not grant release authority.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Evaluate and compare technology stacks with TCO analysis, security assessment, and ecosystem health scoring. Use when comparing frameworks, calculating total cost of ownership, assessing migration paths, or analyzing ecosystem viability.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Prompt engineering and LLM evaluation. Use when optimizing prompts, designing prompt templates, evaluating LLM outputs, building agentic systems, implementing RAG, creating few- shot examples, or designing structured-output workflows.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "evaluate LLM output quality", "set up LLM-as-judge", "build an eval rubric", "compare model outputs pairwise", or "measure agent quality".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Validates dataset formatting and quality for SageMaker model fine-tuning (SFT, DPO, or RLVR). Use when the user says "is my dataset okay", "evaluate my data", "check my training data", "I have my own data", or before starting any fine-tuning job. Detects file format, checks schema compliance against the selected model and technique, and reports whether the data is ready for training or evaluation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Performance scorecard design, post-matter feedback collection, QBR preparation, and firm comparison for in-house legal ops teams evaluating outside counsel. Design a scorecard framework calibrated to your team's maturity level. Produce post-matter feedback forms for supervising attorneys to complete at matter close. Prepare a QBR pack with agenda, data summary, and talking points for structured business reviews. Produce a side-by-side firm comparison for panel decision-making. Trigger on: 'design a performance scorecard', 'how do we evaluate our firms', 'build us a scorecard', 'post-matter feedback form', 'feedback at matter close', 'collect feedback on the firm', 'QBR', 'quarterly business review', 'prep for the firm review', 'what should I raise with the partner', 'compare the firms', 'which firm is performing better', 'rank our panel', 'firm performance data', 'scorecard framework', 'evaluate outside counsel', 'annual firm review', 'how are our firms performing'.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when the user needs to design evaluation datasets, create test cases, stratify samples, generate adversarial examples, extract eval dimensions from traces/specs, or build a labeled evaluation set. Also use when the user mentions test data design, eval coverage, difficulty stratification, synthetic data generation for eval, or "how to create good evaluation data." Outputs datasets in OpenJudge-compatible format.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Automatically evaluate and compare multiple AI models or agents without pre-existing test data. Generates test queries from a task description, collects responses from all target endpoints, auto-generates evaluation rubrics, runs pairwise comparisons via a judge model, and produces win-rate rankings with reports and charts. Supports checkpoint resume, incremental endpoint addition, and judge model hot-swap. Use when the user asks to compare, benchmark, or rank multiple models or agents on a custom task, or run an arena-style evaluation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when the user has nothing — no traces, no labels, no eval set — and needs to build a v0 evaluation from scratch. Also use when the user says "I need to start evaluating my app but don't know where to begin," "I want to set up eval for a new product," or has just identified failure modes and needs to turn them into principles. Outputs a v0 grader in 30 minutes using OpenJudge SimpleRubricsGenerator, plus a roadmap to reach calibrated evaluation.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Post-run self-evaluation system that scores agent output on correctness, clarity, actionability, and conciseness. Use after /team runs, skill executions, or when explicitly asked to evaluate output quality.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Evaluates code generation models across HumanEval, MBPP, MultiPL-E, and 15+ benchmarks with pass@k metrics. Use when benchmarking code models, comparing coding abilities, testing multi-language support, or measuring code generation quality. Industry standard from BigCode Project used by HuggingFace leaderboards.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Analyze website traffic, global rank, engagement metrics, and traffic sources for any domain. Use this skill to evaluate affiliate program websites, compare competitor traffic, assess advertiser strength, or understand where an audience comes from. Triggers on: "analyze traffic for [domain]", "how much traffic does [site] get", "compare traffic between [site A] and [site B]", "is [program] worth promoting based on traffic", "traffic analysis", "website analytics for [domain]", "where does [site] get traffic", "check if [advertiser] is legit", "evaluate [program] website health", "SimilarWeb analysis", "traffic sources for [domain]", "how popular is [site]", "website rank", "domain authority check", "compare affiliate program websites".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when a leader evaluates a marketing TEAM MEMBER using data — a KPI scorecard by role, strengths with real examples, areas to improve stated as observable behavior, a 30 and 90 day development plan, and a 1-5 rating rubric. Trigger on 'performance review for my marketer', 'evaluate a team member', 'monthly 1:1 review', 'feedback for my content writer', 'development plan for an employee', 'is this person underperforming'. Also use when the user is unhappy with someone and cannot articulate why. Not for — evaluating a campaign rather than a person, see `63-campaign-retrospective-global`; reviewing one piece of output, see `62-marketing-review-global`; scoring an external vendor, see `67-agency-vendor-brief-global`.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Implement evaluated findings: load code-style rules, apply the accepted fixes, then close out the change with full or quick QA. Use after $evaluate-findings has tagged findings and they need to be implemented, or when the user asks to "resolve findings", "apply evaluated findings", or "dispatch findings to implementation".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Critically assess external feedback (code reviews, AI reviewers, PR comments) and decide which suggestions to apply using adversarial verification. Use when the user asks to "evaluate findings", "assess review comments", "triage review feedback", "evaluate review output", or "filter false positives".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。