“rspec”的搜索结果

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Runs a 5-seat, role-separated review panel (Journal-Fit Reviewer + 3 peer-review roles + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise; role separation is not a claim of independent error processes. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy, 審查論文, 論文審查, 模擬審查, 同儕審查, 幫我審這篇, 以審查人角度評估, 審查者校準, 논문 심사, 동료 심사, 모의 심사, 심사자 관점에서 평가, 심사자 보정.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Solves UI lock-in. Reverse engineers your existing UI, strips all layout/token decisions, preserves every hook, handler, and API call untouched, then rebuilds the UI from scratch with a fresh design system. Use /ui-restructure to fully redesign, --style apple|linear|minimal|dashboard for named styles, --mode layout|theme|grid for partial rebuilds, --god-mode to redesign from the user's perspective using 100-user mindset simulation and 6 UX principles, --keep-tokens to preserve your token system, --prompt for custom redesigns. Applies mandatory world-class polish: spring motion, 5-state micro-interactions, 8pt spacing grid, WCAG accessibility. Supports Next.js, React, Vue 3, Tailwind, CSS Modules, styled-components, shadcn.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Multi-agent brainstorming: async opinion collision with expert personas. Mixed Codex/Claude Code engine. Use when multiple AI agents need to collaboratively discuss, debate, and converge on solutions through structured dialog. Triggers: brainstorm, multi-perspective discussion, opinion collision, expert debate, war room, collective intelligence, 头脑风暴, 多视角讨论, 集思广益.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Review resumes, cover letters, application packages, and evidence maps from an HR perspective. Use when the user asks for 자기소개서 리뷰, 자소서 검토, HR 검토, 제출 전 점검, unsupported-claim detection, company-name residue checks, or risk-focused revision advice before applying.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Routes general Convex requests to the right project skill. Use when the user asks which Convex skill to use or gives an underspecified Convex app task.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when: analysing a project's architecture, structure, and infrastructure health from the System perspective.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Multi-agent orchestration patterns. Use when multiple independent tasks can run with different domain expertise or when comprehensive analysis requires multiple perspectives.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Clarify requirements before implementing. Use when serious doubts arise.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Debate multi-agente: 2-4 perspectivas (PM, Arquiteto, QA, Security) debatem decisao tecnica. Output: decisao + rationale + dissenting opinions → ADR. Inspirado no Party Mode do BMAD-METHOD.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Generate the success criteria for a task or question, then review work against them. Given a task, goal, or open-ended question, decompose it into scenarios, evaluation perspectives, and fine-grained weighted YES/NO criteria using the Recursive Expansion Tree (RET) method; if work is supplied, score it criterion-by-criterion and surface what is missing or could be better. Use when asked to self-review or check your own work, judge whether a task is done well or completely, build a definition-of-done or completeness checklist, create an evaluation rubric or grading criteria, score or grade answers to a question, set up an LLM-as-judge rubric, or when the user mentions self-review, completeness check, success criteria, evaluation criteria, scoring rubric, Qworld, or the RET algorithm.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Evaluate an interface from a UX perspective, assessing hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with evidence-linked judgments and actionable feedback. Use when the user wants an overall design or UX review—not when the main need is measurable accessibility/performance diagnosis, or final micro-detail polish.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Orchestrates group discussions between installed BMAD agents, enabling natural multi-agent conversations where each agent is a real subagent with independent thinking. Use when user requests party mode, wants multiple agent perspectives, group discussion, roundtable, or multi-agent conversation about their project.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Rewrite a rough request into a sharp, structured prompt before acting on it. Use when the user says "reprompt this", "reprompt", "improve this prompt", "make this prompt better", "structure this request", or hands you a vague/underspecified ask you should sharpen first. Complements the automatic per-turn sharpener (the UserPromptSubmit hook) for explicit, heavier rewrites. Personalizes from ~/.stellar-build/profile.md when present.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Three.js (three, WebGL / WebGPU 3D グラフィクス) r186 リファレンス。 Scene, Group, PerspectiveCamera, OrthographicCamera, WebGLRenderer, WebGPURenderer, RenderPipeline、 BufferGeometry, BufferAttribute, StorageBufferAttribute, Mesh, InstancedMesh, SkinnedMesh、 MeshStandardMaterial, MeshPhysicalMaterial, ShaderMaterial, node-materials (TSL)、 DirectionalLight, SpotLight, PointLight, AmbientLight, PMREMGenerator、 GLTFLoader, FBXLoader, DRACOLoader, TextureLoader、 AnimationMixer, AnimationClip, AnimationAction, KeyframeTrack, Timer、 AudioListener, PositionalAudio、 Vector3, Matrix4, Quaternion, Euler, Color, Box3, Raycaster、 OrbitControls, TransformControls, WebXRManager。

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Shakes your mental models with critical rigor, challenges assumptions, exposes blind spots, and provides multi-perspective insights as a strict thinking mentor. Deliberately breaks format conventions to stimulate genuine cognitive discomfort. Use when you want to stress-test an idea, shake your mental model, ask to challenge my assumptions, find blind spots, deepen my thinking, or request critical review with phrases like yusaburi or what do you think of this plan.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Routes general Convex requests to the right project skill. Use when the user asks which Convex skill to use or gives an underspecified Convex app task.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Clarify requirements before implementing. Use when serious doubts arise.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Review a GitHub pull request from multiple perspectives in parallel, output only findings, then let the user pick which to fix in the same session. Use when the user asks to review a PR by number, mentions "PRレビュー" / "PR review" with a number, or invokes `/pr-review <number>`. Fans out subagents for absolute-rules, stop-slop, security, architecture, code-quality, testing, and ai-antipattern.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Spatial depth design with isometric views, vanishing points, and layered elements that guide attention through 3D-like realism.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Write comprehensive end-to-end tests that verify complete user workflows, integration between components, and system behavior from user perspective using Playwright, Cypress, or similar frameworks. Use when testing user flows, verifying feature integration, testing across real browsers, ensuring UI interactions work correctly, validating form submissions end-to-end, testing authentication flows, catching regressions, automating QA processes, testing API integrations, or building confidence in production deployments.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。