“bench”的搜索结果

Audit Kubernetes cluster security posture against CIS benchmarks using kube-bench with automated checks for control plane, worker nodes, and RBAC.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Autonomous model validation and benchmarking. Investigates any ML model (LLM, image gen, TTS, time series, etc.), runs it on GPU cloud, evaluates quality and performance, and generates HTML reports. Use when user asks to verify, benchmark, evaluate, or test a model. Triggers on "verify model", "benchmark", "evaluate model", "test model", "run benchmark", "model evaluation", "モデルを検証", "ベンチマーク", "モデルを試して".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Benchmark stellar-build skills to measure quality and the lift from optimization. Use when the user says "bench my skills", "bench-skills", "benchmark skills", "did optimization help", "measure my skills", "stellar-loop bench", or wants to quantify whether /optimize-skills actually improved things. Held-out eval prompts scored by an LLM judge, reproducible with fixed seeds. Fully local.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Choose which competitors to compare based on a company's offer, audience, and positioning. Organize candidates into direct, adjacent, and aspirational groups, then narrow the list with selection scores and source links before detailed benchmarking.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Defining the competitor set before a benchmarking project
• Grouping direct, adjacent, and aspirational competitors
• Narrowing candidates for a market landscape report

Measure web page speed, API response times, and build or test duration. Save baseline measurements as JSON tracked in Git, then compare results before and after changes to identify performance regressions and assess launch targets.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Comparing performance before and after a code change
• Investigating reports that a page feels slow
• Checking performance targets before launch

View published benchmark results comparing ponytail with the same agent without the skill. A simple bar chart shows code volume, output tokens, cost, time, and quality checks, clearly separated from results for the current project.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Check benchmark results for code and cost savings
• Compare execution time and output tokens
• Review quality checks alongside savings

Benchmark distributed consensus protocols, methods computers use to agree on shared results. Compare processing rates, response times, scaling behavior, and resource usage across Byzantine, Raft, and Gossip, then identify bottlenecks and potential tuning changes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Comparing Byzantine, Raft, and Gossip performance
• Measuring response times under increasing load
• Finding CPU, memory, or network bottlenecks

Compare saved benchmark runs over time to track win rate, response times, escalation rate, and LLM baseline costs. Review changes between the first and latest runs, with flags for declining win rates or rising average latency.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Check performance trends before a release
• Review benchmark history after expanding the test corpus
• Track latency changes after an agent-booster upgrade

Assess language models with over 60 academic benchmark tests using consistent prompts and scoring. Compare models, track performance during training, and organize research results with support for HuggingFace models, vLLM, and APIs.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Compare models on standard knowledge and reasoning tests
• Track model performance across training checkpoints
• Organize evaluation results for research reports

Evaluate language models with over 100 benchmark tests covering knowledge, math, coding, safety, and image understanding. Configure runs on Docker, Slurm computing clusters, or cloud infrastructure, compare models, and export results.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Compare models using the same benchmark tests
• Run large evaluations on a Slurm cluster
• Evaluate safety and image understanding

Evaluate code generation models with HumanEval, MBPP, and other benchmarks. Test generated programs, compare models across programming languages, and record pass@k scores, which estimate the chance that at least one of k solutions passes the tests.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Comparing code generation models on shared benchmarks
• Measuring correctness across programming languages
• Evaluating models trained to follow instructions

Run MNN checks and regression tests on a host computer or Android device, with stage summaries and failure logs. A separate workflow benchmarks LLM prompt processing and token generation on real iPhones and iPads, including branch comparisons.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Run static checks and host regression tests
• Verify selected backends on an Android device
• Benchmark LLM speed and compare branches on iPhone or iPad

Evaluate code generation models with HumanEval, MBPP, and multilingual benchmarks. The skill guides test execution and model comparisons using pass@k, an estimate of whether at least one of k generated solutions passes the tests.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Compare code generation models on shared benchmarks
• Measure code generation performance across languages
• Evaluate instruction-tuned coding models

Assess language models with over 60 academic benchmark tests using consistent prompts and scoring. Compare models, track performance during training, and organize research results with support for HuggingFace models, vLLM, and APIs.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Compare models on standard knowledge and reasoning tests
• Track model performance across training checkpoints
• Organize evaluation results for research reports

Operate or analyze LoopX-managed benchmark experiments through benchmark-toolkit, including trajectory-based effectiveness and efficiency diagnosis, matched comparisons, run selection and integrity. Solving an assigned task under an existing runner does not by itself select this skill. Excludes casual benchmark discussion and ordinary software microbenchmarks.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Run `doca_bench` (DOCA 2.7.0 or newer) to measure throughput, bulk latency, precision latency, or maximum bandwidth for RDMA, Compress, AES-GCM, SHA, DMA, EC, Ethernet, Comch, or GPUNetIO on a host or BlueField Arm. Use it to discover enabled benchmark libraries, capture a reproducible command/version/device/environment baseline, compare stable runs against a declared tolerance, or diagnose configuration, device-binding, workload-precondition, and measurement failures. Trigger for requests such as measuring BlueField compression speed, NIC RDMA throughput, crypto latency, or a pre-upgrade baseline. Do not use for application end-to-end timing, custom benchmark code, DOCA installation, or binary patches.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Golang benchmarking, profiling, and performance measurement. Use when writing, running, or comparing Go benchmarks, profiling hot paths with pprof, interpreting CPU/memory/trace profiles, analyzing results with benchstat, setting up CI benchmark regression detection, or investigating production performance with Prometheus runtime metrics. Also use when the developer needs deep analysis on a specific performance indicator - this skill provides the measurement methodology, while `samber/cc-skills-golang@golang-performance` provides the optimization patterns.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

SkillsBench contribution workflow. Use when: (1) Creating benchmark tasks, (2) Understanding repo structure, (3) Preparing PRs for task submission.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

An overview of the core model API of SeisBench, a Python framework for training and applying machine learning algorithms to seismic data. It is useful for annotating waveforms using pretrained SOTA ML models, for tasks like phase picking, earthquake detection, waveform denoising and depth estimation. For any waveform, you can manipulate it into an obspy stream object and it will work seamlessly with seisbench models.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

dontbesilent 对标分析。用五重过滤法帮你找到值得模仿的对标，排除一切关于「我」的噪音。 触发方式：/dbs-benchmark、/对标、「帮我找对标」「我该模仿谁」 Benchmark analysis using dontbesilent's five-filter method. Trigger: /dbs-benchmark, "find me a benchmark", "who should I copy"

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Routes any legal task to the right LLM, like OpenRouter but for legal work and grounded in benchmarks instead of brand loyalty. Built from mid-2026 legal evals (legalbenchmarks.ai, Vals AI × Stanford LegalBench across 124 models, Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark, the Atticus Project's CUAD/MAUD/ACORD) plus translation evidence (WMT25, SwiLTra-Bench, ArabLegalEval). Covers five verticals: contract drafting, info extraction, legal research, contract review, and legal translation (including Arabic/MENA). Each asks up to four questions (cost, speed, accuracy/stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/language), then returns a primary model, a fallback, what to avoid, and what a human must verify. Core principle: capability is not controllability, so every route ends with a verification step. Not legal advice; a lawyer owns the output.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Reverse-engineer raw materials (Sparse idea, Dense idea, experimental log) from an existing AI research paper to build a benchmark case for evaluating paper-writing pipelines. Replicates the PaperWritingBench dataset construction procedure from arXiv:2604.05018 §3 / App. C. TRIGGER when the user asks to "build a benchmark case from this paper", "reverse-engineer raw materials", or "evaluate my pipeline against PaperWritingBench".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when generating analysis reports for WB-Bench-Office, WB-Bench-Web, or WB-Bench-Code from a single Harbor evaluation run artifact directory; route to the matching reference workflow.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when running throughput/latency (serving speed) benchmarks against an already-running model server. Uses sgl_jax.bench_serving to sweep batch-size/concurrency and measure throughput and latency, producing summary.csv and per-point bs_<N>/result.jsonl. Speed only — accuracy/eval belongs to model-accuracy-benchmark. Triggers on throughput, latency, bench_serving, batch-size sweep, tok/s, TTFT, TPOT — not accuracy/eval.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。