“clean-code”的搜索结果

Improves code quality across duplication, efficiency, and architectural fit. Use when code passes tests but quality is poor or before a major release.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Applies KISS, YAGNI, and SOLID principles for clean code with reduced complexity. Use when refactoring or reviewing code for over-engineering.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Apply security-conscious thinking when generating or modifying code. Enforces trust boundary awareness, input validation, injection prevention, secrets management, and defense-in-depth authorization. Use when generating code that handles user input, authentication, authorization, database queries, external APIs, or file operations, or when the user mentions 'security review', 'secure this', 'check for vulnerabilities', 'trust boundary', 'input validation', or 'OWASP'. Loaded automatically by the code-generating molecules (code-forge, refactor-safely, bug-fix). This skill governs the security posture of generated code -- not architecture (see architecture) and not code craft (see clean-code).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Perform a structured code review by composing validation checklists from relevant atoms based on what code changed. Loads atoms conditionally -- clean-code always, architecture/DDD/security/tests only when the delta touches their domain. Produces a severity-ordered report with specific locations and fixes. Use when the user asks to 'review this', 'code review', 'quality check', 'validate the code', 'check my code', 'review the delta', or 'review this PR'.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Apply clean code principles when generating or modifying implementation code. Enforces function focus, naming clarity, complexity management, error handling, and self-documenting style. Use when the user mentions 'clean code', 'code quality', 'coding guidelines', or 'implementation quality'. Loaded automatically by the code-generating molecules (code-forge, refactor-safely, bug-fix). This skill governs the craft of writing individual code units -- not architecture (see architecture), not security posture (see secure-coding), not test structure (see test-quality), and not refactoring workflows (see refactor-safely).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Writing maintainable code - readability principles, SOLID patterns applied pragmatically, and the judgment to know when rules should bendUse when "code quality, clean code, readability, naming, SOLID, refactor, code review, best practices, maintainable, how should I structure, clean-code, solid, readability, maintainability, code-review, naming, functions, principles" mentioned.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Review or improve code — one skill, four modes: bug/security review (default), performance, clean-code audit, slop cleanup. Pass mode:review|perf|clean|cleanup or infer. Don't use for writing features or generating tests (use test-coverage).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Defines CC-* code rules and waivers. Use when mapping lint findings to rule IDs or tracking complexity mass, erosion, and verbosity across changes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Software architecture guidelines to maintain code readability (Clean Code, SOLID, DRY) and application scalability / Panduan arsitektur perangkat lunak untuk menjaga keterbacaan kode (Clean Code, SOLID, DRY) dan kemampuan skalabilitas aplikasi.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Code hygiene gate — detect and eliminate dead code, duplicates, naming mess, and code smells. TRIZ-powered. Run after features, before PRs, during debt sprints.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Rewrites code to its simplest possible form while preserving exact external behavior (KISS, YAGNI).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Clean Code (Robert C. Martin) guide to produce and challenge code that is readable, durable, simple, and consistent. Covers naming, functions, comments, smells, and refactor heuristics. Complements `/solid` (SOLID principles) and `/anti-overengineering` (YAGNI/KISS). Activate during the REFACTOR phase of the TDD cycle and during implementation self-review.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Remove dead code, unused imports, fix lint warnings, and normalize formatting across a codebase without changing business logic or architecture. Use when lint warnings have piled up during rapid development, unused imports and variables clutter files, dead code paths were never removed, formatting is inconsistent, or static analysis tools report fixable hygiene issues.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Post-implementation self-review. Use AFTER finishing ANY code implementation or change — before declaring it done, committing, or opening a PR — to critique your own work: re-read the diff adversarially, confirm unit tests cover every branch/edge, kill duplication, follow clean-code/SOLID and the repo's own docs & invariants, decide if something should become documentation, update/prune memory, and strip outdated comments. Trigger it whenever you've just written or modified code and are about to wrap up, even if the user didn't explicitly ask for a review.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Pragmatic coding standards - concise, direct, no over-engineering, no unnecessary comments

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Write readable, maintainable code: naming, small functions, clear control flow, and honest abstractions. Use when writing new code, refactoring, or reviewing for readability.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when writing or reviewing functions, classes, naming, or non-trivial logic (≥3 lines)

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Pragmatic coding standards - concise, direct, no over-engineering, no unnecessary comments

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Application architecture patterns and code organization — clean architecture, hexagonal architecture, feature-based structure, dependency inversion, module boundaries, SOLID principles at module scale. Activate on "clean architecture", "hexagonal architecture", "feature-based structure", "dependency inversion", "module boundaries", "architecture pattern", "folder structure", "fat controller", "circular dependency", "IoC container". NOT for microservice decomposition (use microservices-patterns) or database schema design (use database-design-patterns).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

ALWAYS invoke this skill before writing, editing, generating, or refactoring ANY code. Do not write or modify code directly without first loading and following these Clean Code guidelines. Use when writing new functions/classes, refactoring existing code, reviewing code, fixing bugs, or any task that produces code output.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Post-build pass reducing complexity without changing behavior. Catches dead code, needless abstractions, over-engineering. NOT for style (mk:clean-code) or diff review (mk:review).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Post-implementation simplification pass. Reduces complexity without changing behavior. Use after Phase 3 (Build GREEN) and before Phase 4 (Review). Catches dead code, unnecessary abstractions, over-engineering, and redundant patterns. Triggers on "simplify", "clean up", "reduce complexity", "too complex". NOT for style/convention enforcement (see mk:clean-code); NOT for reviewing diffs or PRs (see mk:review).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Enforces KISS/DRY/YAGNI during authoring and ad-hoc reviews: concise, direct, no unneeded comments. NOT for post-hoc diff/PR review (mk:review); NOT for simplification passes (mk:simplify).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Write clean, readable, and maintainable code following principles from Robert C. Martin's "Clean Code" and Object Calisthenics. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to improve naming, function design, formatting, error handling, and class structure. Includes code smell detection and refactoring guidance.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。