“vulnerability”的搜索结果

Cross-cutting methodology for the CVE-hunting pipeline (ported from find-cve-agent): when a bug is design-vs-real, false-positive avoidance, version checking before reporting, responsible disclosure norms, acceptance-rate expectations per vuln class, vulnerability chaining playbook, known false-positive patterns, maintainer-response patterns, secure-pattern reference (what NOT to flag), and a self-criticism checklist to run before claiming a finding. Use this alongside the cve-hunter/cve-exploiter/cve-validator agents and the /cve-hunt pipeline — load it whenever judging if a finding is real, worth reporting, or already fixed.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

LLM bugs are only worth reporting when they cross a trust boundary you can prove — an OOB callback, a verbatim-reproducible secret, a cross-tenant record, or code execution. A model 'saying something bad once' is confabulation, not a vulnerability. Read the False-Positive Gate before claiming anything.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Cross-pollination multiplier technique: find a vulnerability in one package, then search for the same pattern across all similar packages to multiply findings.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "test for insecure direct object references," "find IDOR vulnerabilities," "exploit broken access control," "enumerate user IDs or object references," or "bypass authorization to access other users' data." It provides comprehensive guidance for detecting, exploiting, and remediating IDOR vulnerabilities in web applications.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "intercept HTTP traffic", "modify web requests", "use Burp Suite for testing", "perform web vulnerability scanning", "test with Burp Repeater", "analyze HTTP history", or "configure proxy for web testing". It provides comprehensive guidance for using Burp Suite's core features for web application security testing.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。