639 个 · 按相关度排序
Run four parallel read-only subagents that each review the same diff from a different lens — security, performance, correctness, and readability — then merge findings into one report. Use before merging large or risky PRs.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality. Covers security, performance, testing, and design review.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Review code changes adversarially using parallel review layers (Blind Hunter, Edge Case Hunter, Acceptance Auditor) with structured triage into actionable categories. Use when the user says "run code review" or "review this code"
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Check an externally created PR for coding rule violations against memory/INDEX.md atoms and docs/architecture/code-review-rules.md.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Claude Code (code.claude.com) デプロイ・CI/CD リファレンス。 Amazon Bedrock / Google Cloud Agent Platform (Vertex AI) / Microsoft Foundry / Claude Platform on AWS、 Claude apps gateway、LLM gateway (protocol / rollout)、 GitHub Actions (claude-code-action) / GitLab CI/CD / GitHub Enterprise Server (GHES)、 Code Review (REVIEW.md・review level・@claude review always・コスト・トラブルシュート)、 ローカル /code-review、ultrareview (claude ultrareview)、 Slack (Claude Tag、旧 Claude Code in Slack、Pro/Max)、 headless mode、cloud environments、devcontainer、 self-hosted environments（runner 構成・identity 検証・本番デプロイ）。
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Provides a structured framework for conducting thorough code reviews covering correctness, security, architecture alignment, performance, and technical debt.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiable success criteria.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Code review checklist for SwiftUI and Swift PRs. Use when reviewing pull requests, checking code quality, verifying Swift/SwiftUI implementations, or conducting PR reviews. Provides prioritized checklist covering state management, performance, component design, data flow, async handling, UI/UX, accessibility, security, and testing.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
PRやコード変更の汎用コードレビューを実施します。コードの品質、セキュリティ、設計を共通基準で評価し、approve/rejectを判断します。「このPRをレビュー」「コードレビューして」「マージ前チェック」などの依頼や、gh pr viewコマンドの実行時に使用してください。
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Pre-commit verification pipeline — static security scan, baseline-aware quality gates, independent reviewer subagent, and auto-fix loop. Use after code changes and before committing, pushing, or opening a PR.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Review code changes by analyzing git diffs, leaving inline comments on PRs, and performing thorough pre-push review. Works with gh CLI or falls back to git + GitHub REST API via curl.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Systematically review pull requests, feature implementations, and code changes to ensure quality, maintainability, security, and adherence to best practices. Use when reviewing code before merging, conducting peer reviews, performing self-reviews, auditing code quality, checking for security vulnerabilities, ensuring consistent coding standards, verifying test coverage, assessing performance implications, evaluating architectural decisions, or providing constructive feedback to improve team code quality.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Review code for AEM Edge Delivery Services projects. Use at the end of development (before PR) for self-review, or to review pull requests. Validates code quality, performance, accessibility, and adherence to EDS best practices.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Review code changes for correctness, completeness, bugs, edge cases, and quality. Load when the user explicitly asks to review code, check a PR, review a diff, audit recent changes, or verify an implementation matches requirements. Also triggers on "review this code", "check this PR", "review my changes", "code review", "did this implement correctly", "audit this diff", or any explicit request for a formal code review. Do NOT load for "review changes for context" or "review what happened" — those are requests to read code, not to perform a formal review.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Author a pull request an AI coding agent can actually get merged: a scoped, coherent diff; a Summary and Test Plan backed by real evidence; correct triage of required-and-blocking CI gates versus external/advisory checks (e.g. a Cloudflare Pages preview build); draft-while-WIP discipline; named fixup commits for real review findings; and a clean landing through a merge queue without force-pushing or bypassing branch protection. Use when opening, updating, triaging red CI on, or landing an agent-authored GitHub PR. NOT for this repo's internal release ceremony, actor embodiments, or contributor mirror-sync mechanics (use port-daddy-internal-dev), tracking backlog/issue lifecycle across a board (use agent-issue-tracker-workflow), or deciding what to build next / sequencing a roadmap (use legible-roadmap-with-sidequests).
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Route a PR review request to the correct tool — code-review plugin (quick parallel scan across all dimensions) or pr-review-toolkit (deep-dive on a specific quality dimension such as type design, error handling, test quality, comments, or simplification). Use when the user asks for a code review, PR review, or mentions a specific quality concern before creating a PR.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
ライブラリ非依存のFlutter/Dartコードレビューチェックリスト。ウィジェットのベストプラクティス、状態管理パターン（BLoC、Riverpod、Provider、GetX、MobX、Signals）、Dartイディオム、パフォーマンス、アクセシビリティ、セキュリティ、クリーンアーキテクチャをカバー。
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when a Spark implementation needs an evidence-based review for correctness, ownership, compatibility, failure handling, maintainability, and unnecessary complexity.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Performs a comprehensive security review of code changes in a GitHub PR or issue. Checks out the branch, analyzes changed files against a 9-category security checklist, and produces PASS/WARNING/FAIL verdicts. Use when reviewing pull requests for security vulnerabilities, hardcoded secrets, injection flaws, auth bypasses, or insecure configurations. Trigger keywords - security review, code review, appsec, vulnerability assessment, security audit, review PR security.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review standards, or mentoring developers.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
PostgreSQL-specific code review assistant focusing on PostgreSQL best practices, anti-patterns, and unique quality standards. Covers JSONB operations, array usage, custom types, schema design, function optimization, and PostgreSQL-exclusive security features like Row Level Security (RLS).
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。