640 个 · 按相关度排序
Run a full pull request review and post review comments directly to the current branch's GitHub PR. Requires the gh CLI to be installed and a PR to already exist for the current branch. Use when you want review feedback posted to GitHub as PR comments. For local code review without posting to GitHub, use code-review instead. Does not write or update PR descriptions — use update-pr-description for that.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Cut a Han release: update CHANGELOG.md with the changes since the last release, bump and tag every plugin that changed as {plugin-name}--v{version} so a version-constrained dependency can resolve, and publish a GitHub release crediting every merged pull request and closed issue to the people behind it. Use when releasing, cutting a release, shipping a new Han version, publishing release notes, or tagging a version. Always stops for approval before creating any tag, because a pushed tag is never moved. Requires the gh CLI, jq, the claude CLI, and a clean git checkout. This is a repository-maintenance skill for the Han repo itself, not a general review or PR skill — use code-review for local review, post-code-review-to-pr to post a PR review, and update-pr-description for PR bodies.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Generate a PR description from the current branch's changes against a GitHub PR, using the gh CLI. Use when writing, drafting, or updating pull request descriptions, PR summaries, or PR bodies. Does not review code or post review comments — use code-review for local review or post-code-review-to-pr for posting a review to GitHub.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Evidence-based investigation of issues, bugs, API calls, integrations, and other aspects of software development that need a deep dive to find the root cause and solutions. Use when you need to debug, troubleshoot, diagnose, or figure out why something is broken. Does not review code for quality or style — use code-review for auditing changes or post-code-review-to-pr for posting review feedback to GitHub. Does not assess architectural health or structural risk — use architectural-analysis for architectural concerns. Does not research open-ended options, prior art, or how something works when nothing is broken — use research for that. Does not plan the structural change a root cause calls for — use plan-a-change. Does not map bounded contexts or domain boundaries — use ddd-analysis. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback for that.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Code review practices with technical rigor and verification gates. Use for receiving feedback, requesting code-reviewer subagent reviews, or preventing false completion claims in pull requests.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Perform thorough code reviews with actionable, prioritized feedback. Use when a user asks to review code, check code quality, find bugs, review a pull request, audit code for issues, or get feedback on implementation. Covers correctness, security, performance, readability, and best practices across languages.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
The art of reviewing code that improves both the codebase and the developer - sharing knowledge, maintaining standards, and building cultureUse when "code review, PR review, pull request, merge request, review comments, LGTM, review feedback, approve PR, request changes, review checklist, code quality, review standards, code-review, pull-request, PR, quality, standards, feedback, collaboration, mentoring" mentioned.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Code review specialist for quality standards, design patterns, security review, and constructive feedbackUse when "code review, pull request, PR review, code quality, refactor, technical debt, design pattern, best practice, code-review, quality, patterns, security, refactoring, best-practices, pull-request, review, ml-memory" mentioned.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Delegate code review to a subagent running a specific model. Use ONLY when user explicitly names a model to review changes ("review with opus", "use sonnet to review", "review with gemini"). The root agent reconstructs changes from conversation history and spawns a subagent with the code-review skill using the specified model. Do NOT use for general code review (use code-review skill instead), for reviewing PRs from git history, or when no model is specified by the user.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Code review knowledge base: quality, security (OWASP Top 10), error-handling, performance, and test-coverage checklists with severity-ranked output format. Use when reviewing code changes, PRs, or before commits. Loaded automatically by the code-reviewer agent.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Reviews Python boundaries, typing, error handling, tests, dependencies, and supported-version idioms against the target project's contracts and active tools. Loaded by dh:code-reviewer for Python source; uses Python-engineering standards when available and retains standalone checks otherwise.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Reviews skill, agent, and plugin artifacts against their intended consumer's schema and runtime contract. Loaded by dh:code-reviewer for SKILL.md, agent definitions, or plugin manifests; checks discovery, frontmatter, triggers, tools, context cost, bundled references, and caller handoffs.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Reviews browser-rendered HTML, CSS, JSX, TSX, JavaScript, and TypeScript for accessibility, XSS, forms, focus, rendering performance, styles, and lifecycle cleanup. Loaded by dh:code-reviewer when source or framework entrypoints establish frontend execution; composes with TypeScript checks.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Provides TypeScript-specific code review patterns covering strict mode, ESM, type safety, branded types, discriminated unions, async patterns, runtime safety, and common anti-patterns. Activates on detection of tsconfig.json, *.ts, or *.tsx files during code review — loaded automatically by dh:code-reviewer.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
对抗性代码评审：代码质量 / 可维护性 / 时序风险 / 综合友好度 / MAS 对齐度。默认 ruthless 模式，找 EVERY flaw。触发场景：(1) RTL lint 后；(2) 显式 /bb-code-review。
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Process and act on code review feedback. Use when receiving review results.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Design AI-powered code review systems. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-code-review-system related tasks.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before making any completion/success claims. Covers three practices - receiving feedback with technical rigor over performative agreement, requesting reviews via code-reviewer subagent, and verification gates requiring evidence before any status claims. Essential for subagent-driven development, pull requests, and preventing false completion claims.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when legacy prompts or older framework flows reference `code-reviewer` and you need the modern runtime to resolve that capability cleanly.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when legacy prompts or older framework flows reference `code-review-expert` and you need the modern runtime to resolve that capability cleanly.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
中文 review 沟通参考——话术模板、分级标注（必须修复/建议修改/仅供参考）、国内团队常见反模式应对。仅在用户显式 /chinese-code-review 时调用，不要根据上下文自动触发。
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。