“contributions”的搜索结果

Review empirical economics papers using criteria modeled on leading journals. Examine causal reasoning, theoretical explanations, regression tables, figures, robustness, and contributions to prior research, then organize potential flaws by severity with concrete suggestions for revision.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Checking an empirical economics paper before submission
• Independently reviewing a paper written with an agent
• Preparing to respond to reviewer comments

Draft research funding proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, and Taiwan NSTC. Organize research aims, methods, expected contributions, budgets, and timelines around each agency’s review criteria and submission requirements, including revisions responding to reviewer feedback.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Drafting a proposal for a specific funding agency
• Explaining research significance and societal benefits
• Aligning budget justifications with the research plan

Coordinate multiple AI agents for research, development, testing, and system analysis. It guides role assignment, communication structures, parallel and sequential tasks, shared memory, progress monitoring, and recovery, bringing separate contributions into reports or coordinated development workflows.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Gather research in parallel and compile a report
• Coordinate application design, implementation, and review
• Run unit, integration, security, and performance tests in parallel

Skeptical review of outside contributions to public repos. Use when reviewing, ranking, or replying to public GitHub pull requests or issues from outside contributors, or when the user says "larp-detector".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

How to develop, modify, and extend the Claude Code codebase following its established programming style, patterns, and conventions. Use this skill whenever working on the claude-code source — adding tools, commands, utils, components, types, hooks, services, or fixing bugs. Also use when the user asks about claude-code architecture, coding standards, file organization, or wants to understand how the codebase works. This skill ensures all contributions match the existing codebase style exactly.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Resolve conflicts and merges when several branches are open against one repo at the same time — the hotspot files every change must touch (registry manifests, a single version field, shared tool config, one aggregated test module, tracked build output), union-vs-recompute-vs-rebuild as three different correct resolutions, generated artifacts that must never be merged, non-deterministic serialization that makes every branch conflict, renumbered identifiers that git cannot show you, and why a clean auto-merge is not a passing test. Use when rebasing or merging a long-lived branch, resolving conflict markers, reviewing a merge commit, deciding what a repo should commit vs generate, or setting up a repo that will take parallel contributions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use when determining author order on research manuscripts, assigning CRediT contributor roles for transparency, documenting individual contributions to collaborative projects, or resolving authorship disputes in multi-institutional research. Generates fair and transparent auth...

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Drafts journal-ready cover letters for manuscript submission. Use when preparing a submission package, communicating the manuscript's contributions and journal fit to editors, or tailoring the novelty framing for a specific journal's scope. Also triggers on "write a cover letter for my paper", "draft a submission cover letter", "help me write to the editor", or "cover letter for [journal name]".

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Draft and review contributions to existing MEX project knowledge in the repo wiki. Use when the user wants to capture a team decision, convention, or architecture note, propose an addition or correction for team review, or invokes /mex-inbox or $mex-inbox. Also supports existing Spec proposals. Keywords: mex, project memory, CLAUDE.md, team memory, drift, inbox. Do not activate for brainstorming alone, routine GROW upkeep, email inboxes, session logs, or handoffs.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Draft and review contributions to existing MEX project knowledge. Use when the user asks to capture a discussion or decision in project knowledge, propose an addition or correction for team review, or explicitly invokes /mex-inbox or $mex-inbox. Also supports existing Spec proposals. Do not activate for brainstorming alone, routine GROW upkeep, email inboxes, session logs, or handoffs.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Build and deliver a raise request that actually works — the evidence, the number, the timing, and the exact words — instead of hoping it gets noticed. Use when asked how do I ask for a raise, I deserve more money, prepare me to ask for a raise, or negotiate a pay increase at my job. Produces a value case built on your actual contributions and market rate, a specific target number with justification, the right timing and person, a script for the conversation, and responses to the likely pushbacks — turning 'I want more' into a business case your manager can say yes to.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Extract and score leads from GitHub repositories by analyzing stars, forks, issues, PRs, comments, and contributions. Produces unified multi-repo CSV with deduplicated user profiles. No paid API credits required.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Multi-agent board meeting protocol running a structured 6-phase deliberation with isolated C-suite contributions to prevent groupthink. Use when making major strategic decisions or resolving cross-functional disagreements.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Help the user turn their Retentioneering ideas, friction reports, bug findings, or feature needs into high-quality upstream contributions: from capturing and validating the idea, through minimal reproductions and issue drafts, to preparing, testing, and submitting a pull request that follows this repository's conventions. Use when the user says they found a bug, wants a feature, wrote a workaround worth upstreaming, or asks how to contribute, open an issue, or make a PR to retentioneering-tools.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Read, decompose, and analyze IEEE-style papers using routed technical-reading workflows. Use when extracting problem setting, object-method-condition logic, contributions, method pipeline, equations, datasets, baselines, metrics, ablations, limitations, replication details, citation role, related-work positioning, implementation notes, or reviewer-style assessment from a paper, PDF, abstract, or manuscript excerpt.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

smina molecular docking CLI. AutoDock Vina fork with customizable scoring functions, native SDF/MOL2/PDB ligand input, autoboxing, local energy minimization, and per-atom score breakdowns. Pipeline: receptor PDBQT prep -> ligand prep (RDKit/OpenBabel) -> dock via autobox or explicit grid -> rescore/minimize with custom scoring -> rank poses by affinity. Choose smina over Vina when you need custom scoring terms (--custom_scoring), local optimization of an existing pose (--local_only), per-atom contributions (--atom_term_data), or SDF/MOL2 ligands without manual PDBQT conversion. For unknown binding sites use diffdock; for the Python-bindings/Vinardo workflow use autodock-vina-docking.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Turn vague or partially formed AI, computer-science, data-driven, and engineering-method research directions into evidence-grounded, falsifiable, paper-ready Research Idea Briefs through heuristic questioning, staged confirmation, literature positioning, novelty attack, and method-figure planning. Use when the user needs to clarify a research idea, formalize inputs/outputs/objectives/constraints, frame background and motivation, select 3-5 anchor papers, identify a defensible gap, derive 2-3 contributions, stress-test novelty, or design an input-to-output method framework and core-paper figure. Also trigger on requests such as 明确科研 idea、启发式梳理 idea、互动追问科研问题、梳理论文创新点、定义研究任务、找对标论文、把研究方向变成论文方案、画方法框架图. Do not use as the primary workflow for running experiments, exhaustive systematic reviews, drafting full manuscript sections, or polishing finished prose.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Source technical and professional talent by combining LinkedIn profiles, GitHub contributions, and company intelligence. Identifies candidates with specific skills, assesses expertise depth, and provides outreach context for recruiting teams.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Research GitHub user profiles including repositories, contributions, languages, stars, and activity patterns. Useful for developer talent sourcing, open-source community research, and technical due diligence on engineering teams.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Prepare a meeting-ready alternative-investments brief for a client, household, IRA, trust, or named account before a review — pulls the alts book from iCapital or Addepar (positions, NAV vs. commitment, called and unfunded amounts, contributions/distributions/subscriptions/redemptions, lockups, and the platform's own IRR/TVPI/DPI/RVPI) and sits it beside the liquid book and IPS target from the connected portfolio system (Orion Connect, Addepar, or Envestnet), then flags cash needed for capital calls, alts % vs. target, concentration, unfunded concentration, and stale as-of data. Cites the source platform on every figure and keeps disclosures on the page. Does not recommend funds, forecast NAVs/IRRs, or simulate allocation changes. Triggers on "alts brief", "/alts-brief", "prep the [client]'s alts review", "what's going on with [client]'s PE/private investments", "how's [client] doing on their alts", or any request to review a household's alternative investment positions before a meeting.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Implement and route HitKeep contributions through the repository-owned hk developer platform. Use for any HitKeep code, UI, API, database, analytics-feature, seed, screenshot, documentation, integration, or release-preparation change, as well as setup, local development, builds, smoke tests, and contributor workflow discovery.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Reads and analyzes academic papers (arXiv preprints, conference / journal PDFs, Zotero items) at three configurable depths: quick skim (2 min), standard read (10 min), or deep analysis (30 min). Produces structured digests covering problem, method, key innovation, results, limitations, reproducibility, hidden assumptions, and connections to the user's other work. Use when the user shares an arXiv link, PDF, or paper title and asks to read / summarize / digest / TL;DR / analyze / review / critique / explain / break down a paper, asks about a paper's contributions / methods / results / equations / figures, wants to compare two papers side by side, or needs a reading note for their records.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Schools of historical thought, methodology debates, and the philosophy of history. Covers the major historiographical traditions (Annales, Marxist, feminist, postcolonial, subaltern, world-systems), their methodological commitments, their contributions and limitations, and the enduring debates about objectivity, narrative, and the nature of historical knowledge. Use when evaluating how different historians approach the same subject, understanding why historical interpretations change over time, or assessing the theoretical framework underlying a historical argument.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Drafts or audits a scientific paper's introduction: real-world motivation, evidence audit, theory-to-if-then funnel with a named estimand, bridges across experiments, and calibrated contributions. Use to write, frame, or critique an introduction.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。