396 个 · 按相关度排序
Evaluate and compare technology stacks with TCO analysis, security assessment, and ecosystem health scoring. Use when comparing frameworks, calculating total cost of ownership, assessing migration paths, or analyzing ecosystem viability.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Negotiation frameworks for technology services agreements, B2B contracts, and professional services deals. Use when reviewing or negotiating tech contracts.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Risk-based vendor assessment framework for IT service providers, technology vendors, and third-party partners under DORA, NIS2, GDPR. Provides three-phase process (Initial Screening / Detailed Assessment / Final Evaluation), six-dimension risk scoring (Financial/Operational/Compliance/Security/Reputational/Strategic) with weighted matrices, full DORA Art. 28-30 contractual checklist, NIS2 Art. 21(2) security measures enumeration, GDPR Art. 28 documentation checks, red flags per dimension, trigger-based review criteria, and document templates. Use when: (1) Evaluating new vendors or technology providers, (2) Conducting critical ICT third-party due diligence under DORA, (3) Performing supply chain security assessment under NIS2, (4) Creating vendor onboarding documentation, (5) Establishing ongoing vendor monitoring, (6) Assessing concentration risk, or (7) Generating executive vendor risk reports.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
When we combine gene-editing technology and sequencing technology, we need to reconstruct a lineage tree from alleles generated and calculate the similarity between each pair of groups. FindIndel() and IndelForm() function will help you align each read to reference sequence and generate scar form strings respectively. IndelIdents() function will help you to define a scar form for each cell or read. IndelPlot() function will help you to visualize the distribution of deletion and insertion. TagPro
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Database comparison catalogs, RDBMS vs NoSQL selection criteria, CAP/ACID/BASE theory, OLTP vs OLAP, and technology-specific characteristics
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Guides technology selection and implementation of AI and ML features in .NET 8+ applications using ML.NET, Microsoft.Extensions.AI (MEAI), Microsoft Agent Framework (MAF), GitHub Copilot SDK, ONNX Runtime, and OllamaSharp. Covers the full spectrum from classic ML through modern LLM orchestration to local inference. Use when adding classification, regression, clustering, anomaly detection, recommendation, LLM integration (text generation, summarization, reasoning), RAG pipelines with vector search, agentic workflows with tool calling, Copilot extensions, or custom model inference via ONNX Runtime to a .NET project. DO NOT USE FOR projects targeting .NET Framework (requires .NET 8+), the task is pure data engineering or ETL with no ML/AI component, or the project needs a custom deep learning training loop (use Python with PyTorch/TensorFlow, then export to ONNX for .NET inference).
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Full-spectrum product research pipeline. Runs competitive analysis, technology trend scouting, user feedback analysis, and feature ideation. Trigger on: research, competitive research, market research, feature discovery, what should we build next, technology trends, user feedback, app store reviews, GitHub issues analysis, competitive landscape, product strategy.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Identify the technology stack powering any website — frameworks, CMS, analytics, hosting, CDN, payment processors, and marketing tools. Useful for competitive intelligence, sales prospecting, and technology landscape research.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
World-class accessibility design expertise combining the inclusive design principles of Microsoft's Inclusive Design team, the technical rigor of the W3C WCAG working group, and the lived experience perspective of disability advocates. Accessibility is not a feature - it's a fundamental quality attribute that makes products usable by everyone. Great accessibility design is invisible to those who don't need it and essential to those who do. It benefits everyone: captions help in noisy environments, keyboard navigation helps power users, high contrast helps in bright sunlight. When you design for the extremes, you improve the experience for all. Accessibility is not a checklist - it's a mindset that asks "who are we excluding?" at every design decision. Use when "accessibility, a11y, wcag, screen reader, keyboard navigation, color contrast, alt text, aria, focus management, skip link, assistive technology, inclusive design, ada compliance, section 508, accessible, voiceover, nvda, jaws, tab order, focus trap, accessibility, a11y, wcag, inclusive-design, screen-reader, keyboard-navigation, color-contrast, aria, focus-management, assistive-technology" mentioned.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Applies the product philosophy and leadership frameworks of Steve Jobs, co-founder and CEO of Apple Inc. Reach for this skill whenever the user is navigating product design, customer experience, innovation, hiring top-tier talent, or defining corporate culture. Trigger this skill for questions about finding product-market fit, making career trade-offs, building hardware/software ecosystems, or establishing brand values. Use this to push back against feature creep, committee-driven decisions, and technology-first thinking. Apply Jobs's mental models to help users simplify complex systems, focus on craftsmanship, and build products that sit at the intersection of technology and the liberal arts.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Expert FinOps guidance for cloud, AI, and SaaS technology spend. Covers AI cost management, agentic FinOps, GenAI capacity planning, self-hosted vs managed inference, Anthropic billing, open-weight vendor APIs (DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi, GLM), AWS (EC2, Bedrock, SageMaker, Savings Plans, CUR), Azure (reservations, AHB, OpenAI PTUs), GCP (Vertex AI, BigQuery), OCI, Kubernetes cost allocation, data platforms (Databricks, Fabric F-SKUs, Snowflake), tagging governance, SaaS management (SAM, shadow IT), AI coding tools (Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot, Codex), ITAM, allocation, showback, chargeback, anomaly management, KPIs and benchmarking, waste detection playbooks, workload onboarding and M&A, and GreenOps (cloud carbon, CSRD). Use for any question about technology cost or waste in your estate - expiring commitments or RIs, NAT gateway bills, idle VMs, snapshot sprawl - and for commitment sizing, rightsizing, allocation, SaaS sprawl, AI dev tool spend, or connecting spend to business value. Built by OptimNow.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Structures technology diligence with architecture review, code quality assessment, scalability analysis, and technical debt evaluation. Use when evaluating startup technology, assessing engineering teams, or reviewing technical infrastructure.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Evaluates OFS sector investments with rig count sensitivity, day rate analysis, and technology adoption curves. Use when analyzing oilfield services, evaluating service company economics, or assessing technology uptake.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Guide a person through structured learning of a new topic, technology, or skill. AI acts as learning coach — assessing current knowledge, designing a learning path, walking through material, testing understanding, adapting difficulty, and planning review sessions for retention. Use when a person wants to learn a new technology and does not know where to start, when someone feels overwhelmed by documentation, when a person keeps forgetting material and needs spaced repetition, or when transitioning between domains and needing a gap analysis.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Map the intellectual property landscape for a technology domain or product area. Covers patent cluster analysis, white space identification, competitor IP portfolio assessment, freedom-to-operate preliminary screening, and strategic IP positioning recommendations. Use before starting R&D in a new technology area, when evaluating market entry against incumbents with strong patent portfolios, preparing for investment due diligence, informing a patent filing strategy, or assessing freedom-to-operate risk for a new product.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
"Apply Sociotechnical Systems Theory to analyze and design work systems through joint optimization of social and technical subsystems. Use this skill when the user needs to diagnose why a technology implementation disrupted work practices, design IT-enabled work systems that balance human and technical needs, or when they ask 'why did this system hurt productivity despite being technically sound', 'how do we design work around new technology', or 'why are people resisting this technically superior system'.".
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Partner, channel, and ecosystem marketing for B2B SaaS — and the design of the partner program itself. Use this skill for co-marketing with technology alliances and channel partners, integration launches, joint campaigns and content, partner tiering and enablement, cloud-marketplace go-to-market (AWS, Azure, GCP listings, private offers, committed-spend drawdown), and for channel program architecture: whether to launch a partner program at all, which motions to run (referral, technology, services/SI, reseller), partner unit economics, margin and SPIF design, partner recruitment and certification ramp, and the rules of engagement that settle a contested deal. Also triggers on: partner marketing, co-marketing, channel, reseller, VAR, MSP, distributor, OEM, alliance, ecosystem, integration launch, marketplace listing, AWS Marketplace, private offer, MDF, joint webinar, co-branded, channel conflict, rules of engagement, deal registration, partner program design, should we build a partner program, partner economics, partner P&L, partner CAC, margin stacking, SPIF, rebate, partner recruitment, partner onboarding, partner certification, partner tiers, our partners signed up and never sold anything.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Chief Technology Officer — deciding build vs buy for a core system, choosing whether an architecture bet is worth a full rewrite, sizing an SLA/uptime commitment against engineering cost, structuring engineering teams around a product roadmap, or writing the technical risk section of a board update.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when a decision needs deep multi-source technical research with cited evidence — technology evaluation, ecosystem comparison, standards/spec fact-finding, "how do others solve X". Triggers on "research X", "deep dive on X", "evaluate X vs Y", "find best practices for X". NOT for library/API doc lookup (see mk:docs-finder); NOT for one-shot URL fetch (see mk:web-to-markdown); NOT for internal codebase discovery (see mk:scout); NOT for project-only Q&A (see mk:ask-me); NOT for comparing solution designs (see mk:brainstorming); NOT for root-cause debugging (see mk:investigate); NOT for wiki ingestion of sources (see mk:wiki-research).
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Expert-level battery technology covering electrochemistry, lithium-ion battery physics, battery management systems, degradation mechanisms, and next-generation battery chemistries.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Knowledge base from the DoD Manufacturing Readiness Level (MRL) Deskbook (Version 2022, OSD ManTech / Joint Service–Industry MRL Working Group). Use for assessing and managing manufacturing maturity and producibility risk in defense acquisition: the 10-level MRL scale and its non-linear, target-not-grade nature; the five demonstration environments (laboratory → production-relevant → production-representative → pilot line → production line); the nine manufacturing-risk threads and sub-threads; how MRL targets map onto Adaptive Acquisition Framework milestones (MRL 4/6/7/8/9); conducting an MRL Assessment; building a Manufacturing Maturation Plan; putting MRL maturity into contract language (Section L/M, SOW, AS6500A, DIDs); tailoring criteria for S&T, single-system, ship, sustainment, and industry contexts; and screening operational-technology cybersecurity. Manufacturing-readiness focused — it measures producibility risk and frames mitigation; it is NOT a technology-readiness (TRL) guide, a full systems-engineering process model, a cost-estimating or schedule guide, or a deep cybersecurity audit method (see sibling packs for those).
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Technical research methodology with YAGNI/KISS/DRY principles. Phases: scope definition, information gathering, analysis, synthesis, recommendation. Capabilities: technology evaluation, architecture analysis, best practices research, trade-off assessment, solution design. Actions: research, analyze, evaluate, compare, recommend technical solutions. Keywords: research, technology evaluation, best practices, architecture analysis, trade-offs, scalability, security, maintainability, YAGNI, KISS, DRY, technical analysis, solution design, competitive analysis, feasibility study. Use when: researching technologies, evaluating architectures, analyzing best practices, comparing solutions, assessing technical trade-offs, planning scalable/secure systems.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Library of accessibility personas representing people with various disabilities, impairments, and situational limitations. Use this skill when users ask about disability types, accessibility personas, user needs for specific conditions, how people with disabilities use technology, assistive technology users, or designing for accessibility. Triggers on requests about blindness, deafness, cognitive disabilities, motor impairments, low vision, screen readers, sign language, autism, ADHD, temporary disabilities, or any question about "how would a person with X use this".
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Comprehensive technology-agnostic prompt generator for documenting end-to-end application workflows. Automatically detects project architecture patterns, technology stacks, and data flow patterns to generate detailed implementation blueprints covering entry points, service layers, data access, error handling, and testing approaches across multiple technologies including .NET, Java/Spring, React, and microservices architectures.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。