“experiment”的搜索结果

Use to run an autoresearch-style experiment loop — improve a measurable artifact by trying changes, measuring against one objective metric, keeping if better and reverting if not, on an isolated git branch with a logged trail. Trigger on "/experiment", "run an experiment loop", "autoresearch X", "tune/optimize X against a metric", "hill-climb X". Follows references/sops/experiment-loop.md. Enforces the autonomy gate (objective metric + reversible sandbox + no PHI/external) before any unsupervised looping.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Pre-pipeline aggregator that scans AI agent cache directories (.claude, .cursor, .antigravity, .openclaw) or any user-specified directory for experimentation logs, extracts insights and numeric results, and formats them as PaperOrchestra-ready inputs (idea.md + experimental_log.md). TRIGGER when the user says "aggregate my agent logs for paper writing", "extract experiments from my coding agent history", "prepare PaperOrchestra inputs from my cache", "turn my agent logs into a paper", mentions a folder or directory they want to use as the basis for a paper, or wants to run PaperOrchestra but only has scattered agent experiment histories rather than structured inputs. Run this BEFORE paper-orchestra. Also called automatically by paper-orchestra when workspace/inputs/idea.md or workspace/inputs/experimental_log.md are missing.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Design product experiments to test hypotheses. Use when the user says "run an experiment", "A/B test this", "build-measure-learn", "validate this assumption", "test this hypothesis", "we don't know if this will work", "minimum viable test", "lean experiment", or wants to reduce risk before fully building a feature - even if they don't explicitly say "experiment". For sample sizes, power calculations and significance testing, use ab-test-design instead.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Structures biological experiments so inference is valid by construction, covering Fisher's principles (randomization, replication, local control), the experimental-vs-observational unit distinction and pseudoreplication (Hurlbert 1984; Lazic 2018), randomization mechanics (complete, restricted, stratified, rerandomization, run-order), blocking layouts (randomized complete block, Latin square, incomplete block), factorial designs and interactions, and the split-plot/nested error strata hidden inside multi-batch genomics. Use when deciding the experimental unit and what counts as a replicate, planning randomization and run order, choosing a blocked/factorial/split-plot/nested layout, avoiding pseudoreplication in cell-culture or animal studies, or specifying the random-effects structure of the analysis model. For assigning samples to sequencing batches/lanes/plates and batch-effect correction see experimental-design/batch-design; for regulated clinical-trial randomization see clinical-biostatistics.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Configures the rollout shape of a PostHog experiment — the variant split (50/50, 80/20, A/B/C ratios), the overall rollout percentage that gates how many users enter the experiment, and the disambiguation when a percentage like "roll out to 25%" could mean either. Use when the user mentions a rollout percentage, variant split, or traffic distribution; gives a ratio like 60/40, 70/30, or 80/20; asks "who sees the test variant?"; wants to increase, decrease, or change the rollout or split on a draft or running experiment; weighs equal vs uneven splits; or proposes a mid-experiment split change (often an anti-pattern that needs reset or end-and-restart).

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Structures biological experiments so inference is valid by construction, covering Fisher's principles (randomization, replication, local control), the experimental-vs-observational unit distinction and pseudoreplication (Hurlbert 1984; Lazic 2018), randomization mechanics (complete, restricted, stratified, rerandomization, run-order), blocking layouts (randomized complete block, Latin square, incomplete block), factorial designs and interactions, and the split-plot/nested error strata hidden inside multi-batch genomics. Use when deciding the experimental unit and what counts as a replicate, planning randomization and run order, choosing a blocked/factorial/split-plot/nested layout, avoiding pseudoreplication in cell-culture or animal studies, or specifying the random-effects structure of the analysis model. For assigning samples to sequencing batches/lanes/plates and batch-effect correction see experimental-design/batch-design; for regulated clinical-trial randomization see clinical-biostatistics.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Structures biological experiments so inference is valid by construction, covering Fisher's principles (randomization, replication, local control), the experimental-vs-observational unit distinction and pseudoreplication (Hurlbert 1984; Lazic 2018), randomization mechanics (complete, restricted, stratified, rerandomization, run-order), blocking layouts (randomized complete block, Latin square, incomplete block), factorial designs and interactions, and the split-plot/nested error strata hidden inside multi-batch genomics. Use when deciding the experimental unit and what counts as a replicate, planning randomization and run order, choosing a blocked/factorial/split-plot/nested layout, avoiding pseudoreplication in cell-culture or animal studies, or specifying the random-effects structure of the analysis model. For assigning samples to sequencing batches/lanes/plates and batch-effect correction see experimental-design/batch-design; for regulated clinical-trial randomization see clinical-biostatistics.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Turn assumptions, funnel opportunities, and product questions into a prioritised, feasibility-checked experiment backlog. Filters by traffic reality, metric latency, and method feasibility — not just ICE/RICE scoring. Maintains a living portfolio with status (idea → designed → running → readout → archived). Load when the user says "what should we test next", "build an experiment backlog", "prioritise our tests", "where should we experiment", "what's worth testing", or when the experimentation orchestrator routes here.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Structures biological experiments so inference is valid by construction, covering Fisher's principles (randomization, replication, local control), the experimental-vs-observational unit distinction and pseudoreplication (Hurlbert 1984; Lazic 2018), randomization mechanics (complete, restricted, stratified, rerandomization, run-order), blocking layouts (randomized complete block, Latin square, incomplete block), factorial designs and interactions, and the split-plot/nested error strata hidden inside multi-batch genomics. Use when deciding the experimental unit and what counts as a replicate, planning randomization and run order, choosing a blocked/factorial/split-plot/nested layout, avoiding pseudoreplication in cell-culture or animal studies, or specifying the random-effects structure of the analysis model. For assigning samples to sequencing batches/lanes/plates and batch-effect correction see experimental-design/batch-design; for regulated clinical-trial randomization see clinical-biostatistics.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Search scientific papers by topic or DOI, a paper’s identifier, and organize evidence extracted from full text. Connect claims with experiments, reported statistics, limitations, and source locations for literature reviews and evidence tables.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Find papers relevant to a research question
• Check experimental details beyond abstracts
• Build evidence tables with traceable sources

Plan A/B tests to compare page or messaging changes. Helps define hypotheses, choose success metrics, estimate sample sizes, allocate traffic, and interpret results, while also organizing a repeatable process for prioritizing and documenting experiments.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Compare headline or button-copy variants
• Plan sample sizes and test duration around available traffic
• Analyze results alongside metrics that must not worsen

Create and run evaluations in Arize using an LLM as the judge. Define scoring criteria, connect them to actual data fields, evaluate recorded operations or experiment results, and set up continuous scoring for new data.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Check answers for unsupported claims
• Score experiment results for correctness
• Continuously evaluate new production records

Guides experiments that inspect and change internal model values using nnsight. Covers local PyTorch models and remote experiments through NDIF, including replacing intermediate values to test how particular layers affect a model’s predictions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Inspecting layer outputs and attention patterns
• Replacing internal values to compare predictions
• Running large-model experiments through NDIF

Plan and evaluate product A/B tests with clear hypotheses, success metrics, sample size estimates, and stopping rules. Rank proposed experiments and interpret results using effect sizes and uncertainty to support practical product decisions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Turn a product improvement idea into a testable hypothesis
• Estimate the sample size needed for an A/B test
• Rank experiments by impact, confidence, and ease

Route product questions to a specialist for prioritization, research, analytics, experiments, or implementation. Support recurring discovery by tracking interviews and assumption tests, checking how customer needs connect to proposed solutions, and returning results with a concise digest.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Prioritizing features with an explicit framework
• Planning product experiments and sample sizes
• Tracking weekly interviews and assumption tests

Plan A/B tests that compare page variations, from headlines to pricing layouts. Define a hypothesis, choose success metrics, calculate sample size and duration, and prepare launch checks and results reports to support decisions.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Comparing landing page headlines
• Testing signup button changes
• Planning pricing page experiments

Turn a new product idea into a testable hypothesis and two or three simple experiments. Define target customers, expected actions, measurement methods, and success thresholds to assess demand through behavior such as sign-ups, pre-orders, or paid commitments.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Testing demand before building a new product
• Planning landing page or waitlist experiments
• Checking willingness to pay through pre-orders

Structure problem solving around clear goals, competing explanations, experiments, and measurable results. Use the cycle to diagnose bugs, validate features, compare prompts, or evaluate an early product, then choose the next step based on evidence.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Diagnosing a bug with a quick investigation
• Comparing prompt structures through experiments
• Defining success criteria for a feature

Reviews research ideas, papers, and experimental results through repeated critical discussion. Identifies unsupported claims, missing experiments, and weaknesses in the paper’s story, then records agreed conclusions, evidence requirements, and prioritized improvements in a review document.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Reviewing research claims before submission
• Planning the minimum additional experiments
• Matching possible results to defensible claims

Coordinate a research project from a broad topic through literature review, idea selection, experiments, and iterative review. Produce a research summary for writing, with optional paper drafting and PDF compilation, while recording stage progress for later resumption.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Taking a broad research topic through experiments and review
• Coordinating experiment implementation and result collection
• Preparing an evidence-based handoff for paper writing

Get critical feedback from Claude on research ideas, papers, and experimental results. Through multiple review rounds, identify unsupported claims, missing experiments, and narrative weaknesses, then document agreed conclusions and a prioritized improvement plan.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Finding logical gaps in a research idea
• Planning additional experiments after review
• Checking whether paper claims match the evidence

Get critical feedback on research ideas, papers, and experimental results from an external AI reviewer. Repeated discussions help identify unsupported claims, plan missing experiments, and document agreed improvements with priorities and estimated computing costs.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Find gaps in research claims and evidence
• Plan additional experiments within a computing budget
• Review a paper's structure before submission

Turn a broad research direction into ranked ideas, a refined proposal, and an experiment plan. The workflow combines literature searches, novelty checks, small pilot experiments, and Gemini review to assess evidence and identify useful next steps.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Explore concrete ideas within a broad research topic
• Check how proposed ideas differ from prior work
• Compare promising ideas through small pilot experiments

Have Gemini critically review research developed with Codex. Multiple rounds of discussion examine logical gaps, missing experiments, and narrative weaknesses, then turn the findings into experiment plans, paper outlines, and documented research priorities.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示英语简介。

• Get Gemini feedback on research developed with Codex
• Identify logical gaps and missing experiments
• Develop a paper outline through review discussions