132 个 · 按相关度排序
Restructure and improve Isabelle or Coq proofs to enhance readability, modularity, and maintainability without changing semantics. Use when proofs are long and monolithic, have repeated patterns, use unclear naming, lack documentation, or when the user asks to refactor, clean up, improve, or reorganize their formal proofs.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Reorganizes markdown documents into well-structured, consistent format while preserving content and improving readability. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Fix heading hierarchy issues (skipped levels, multiple h1s), (2) Generate or update table of contents, (3) Standardize formatting (lists, code blocks, emphasis, links), (4) Improve grammar and spelling, (5) Add missing standard sections (installation, usage, etc.), (6) Remove redundant or duplicate content, (7) Restructure technical docs, READMEs, or long-form content for better organization and flow.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Run the weak-agent adversarial test harness against docx-cli. Spawns weak exercise agents (Haiku by default, Sonnet to probe, or a local agent harness's pre-produced runs) to perform real document tasks over six scenarios — five editing (MNDA form-fill + font fidelity, invoice table-edit/restructure + logo replace, résumé styling, contract redlining + commenting, contract finalize via accept/reject + comment reply/resolve) and one authoring (T. S. Eliot poetry journal: multi-column, verse, footnotes, links, figure) — renders every result with Word, has opus judge them against ground-truth rubrics, measures each exercise's tool economy, token cost, wall-clock, and correctness (from transcripts for Claude, the exercise.json ledger for the local harness), and synthesizes a prioritized ergonomics report. Use when the user says 'adversarial review', 'test docx-cli with weak agents', 'run the haiku harness', 'weak agent test', or wants to re-run yesterday's adversarial process.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Turn whatever the agent just produced — a conversation, an analysis, an artifact, a markdown file — into a live shareable URL in seconds, published as-is via ReportRoom. Use when the user says "share this", "give me a link", "put this online", "make this a page", "send this to someone". This is the fast, verbatim path — for a restructured, designed report use report-publisher; for a view-tracked proposal use proposal-tracker.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Restructure existing code safely without changing externally observable behavior. Composes context, design, architecture, code quality, and testing guardrails into a characterization-first refactoring workflow. Use when the user says 'refactor this', 'clean this up', 'untangle this module', 'move this to the right layer', 'simplify this code', or 'improve this structure'.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Restructure and optimize alert rules for monitoring platforms (Sentry, PagerDuty, Datadog, OpsGenie). Use when someone asks to "reduce alert noise", "fix alert fatigue", "create alert rules", "set up escalation policies", "tune alerting thresholds", or "create on-call runbooks". Generates platform-specific alert configurations and tiered escalation policies.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when the user wants to rename, extract, split, move, or restructure code safely. Examples: "Rename this function", "Extract this into a module", "Refactor this class", "Move this to a separate file"
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Restructure code without changing observable behavior: rename, extract, inline, move, deduplicate, or replace an internal implementation with an equivalent one. Prove parity through unchanged pre-existing tests. Not for new behavior, bug fixes, explanation-only questions, or committing finished work.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Restructure code without changing observable behavior: rename, extract, inline, move, deduplicate, or replace an internal implementation with an equivalent one. Prove parity through unchanged pre-existing tests. Not for new behavior, bug fixes, explanation-only questions, or committing finished work.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
When the user wants to plan, map, or restructure their website's page hierarchy, navigation, URL structure, or internal linking. Also use when the user mentions "sitemap," "site map," "visual sitemap," "site structure," "page hierarchy," "information architecture," "IA," "navigation design," "URL structure," "breadcrumbs," "internal linking strategy," "website planning," "what pages do I need," "how should I organize my site," or "site navigation." Use this whenever someone is planning what pages a website should have and how they connect. NOT for XML sitemaps (that's technical SEO — see seo-audit). For SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data, see schema.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when the user wants to rename, extract, split, move, or restructure code safely. Examples: "Rename this function", "Extract this into a module", "Refactor this class", "Move this to a separate file"
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
When the user wants to plan, map, or restructure their website's page hierarchy, navigation, URL structure, or internal linking. Also use when the user mentions "sitemap," "site map," "visual sitemap," "site structure," "page hierarchy," "information architecture," "IA," "navigation design," "URL structure," "breadcrumbs," "internal linking strategy," "website planning," "what pages do I need," "how should I organize my site," or "site navigation." Use this whenever someone is planning what pages a website should have and how they connect. NOT for XML sitemaps (that's technical SEO — see seo-audit). For SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data, see schema.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
File notes into the right folder in the user's Obsidian vault and audit/reorganize its structure, via the `obsidian` CLI and the `00_Index/Folder_Map.md` map note. Use when a note needs filing, when the user asks where a note belongs, or wants to tidy, deduplicate, audit, or restructure folders. Requires the Obsidian app to be running.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Write, restructure, classify, and review documentation with the Diataxis framework. Use when the user asks to create, improve, audit, or reorganize documentation of any kind: knowledge bases, help centers, onboarding guides, process docs, manuals, runbooks, product or API docs, tutorials, how-to guides, references, explanations. Also use when the user mentions Diataxis, docs taxonomy, or documentation architecture, or asks why a document feels confusing. Also use for Simplified Technical English (ASD-STE100) or controlled-language rewrites of English technical docs. Not for marketing, legal, sales, press, or fiction writing unless the user wants a Diataxis-style analysis.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Design or review org structure - spans of control, reporting lines, role clarity, headcount plan, and team topology. Use when asked to "design our org", "should we restructure", "what is the right team structure", or "plan headcount for next year".
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Drafts or audits a scientific paper’s introduction and framing — the real-world "why", an evidence audit, the funnel from theory to a falsifiable if-then with a named estimand, bridges across experiments, and a contribution list matched to the design. Use when the user asks to write, restructure, or critique an introduction, motivate or frame a paper, repair a gap-in-the-literature opening, sharpen or calibrate a contribution claim, or connect experiments into one argument. Sentence-level flow and wording are out of scope.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Generates professional PyPI-compliant README files in Markdown or reStructuredText. Use when creating a Python package README for PyPI publication, converting between README.md and README.rst formats, validating markup with twine check before publishing, configuring the readme field in pyproject.toml, integrating sphinx-readme to generate PyPI-compatible RST from Sphinx docs, troubleshooting rendering errors on PyPI, or previewing README rendering locally with grip or docutils.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Silently restructures the user's natural-language prompt into the format the model CURRENTLY running this skill handles best, then answers. On activation it identifies which model family is executing it (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Llama, DeepSeek, Mistral, Qwen, Grok, Perplexity, Kimi, GLM, Command, Nova, or Phi) and loads that one model's official strategy — so the optimization always matches the model that actually runs it. Activate with /prompt-refine. Use when users want better answers without learning prompt engineering.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Restructure and enrich the tdmcp documentation site for artists — categorized/collapsible sidebar (EN+PT), interactive goal-based guide home, new step-by-step tutorials, copy-prompt/level-badge components. Use whenever the user asks to make the docs more interactive, easier to navigate, better organized, add categories/subcategories, add tutorials, improve docs UX/IA, or for follow-ups: re-run, continue, fix QA findings, add one more tutorial, re-organize a section, or update the docs structure. NOT for syncing docs with a release (tdmcp-docs-roadmap-update) or cookbook entries (tdmcp-cookbook-examples).
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Assesses post-emergence equity with clean balance sheet analysis, improved capital structure, and re-rating potential. Use when evaluating post-reorg equity, analyzing emergence opportunities, or assessing restructured company value.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Use when the user wants to rename, extract, split, move, or restructure code safely. Examples: "Rename this function", "Extract this into a module", "Refactor this class", "Move this to a separate file"
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Maintain CHANGELOG.md — add new version entries, keep the Unreleased section, cut a release, or restructure the whole file — following the Keep a Changelog format and Semantic Versioning.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Fundraising Pitch Deck Specialist. Use to build, review, or restructure a founder deck for pre-seed through Series A, with a clear narrative arc, investor-grade slide logic, and explicit asks.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。
Draft or restructure research-paper sections, refine local prose, and audit manuscript-wide consistency. Use for evidence-grounded academic writing and revision, not independent acceptance-risk review or official rebuttal management.
中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。