“judgment”的搜索结果

Use this skill whenever the user asks for an HTML-first visual design deliverable or design judgment: interactive prototype, slide deck, motion demo, infographic, dashboard, landing page, whitepaper, changelog, business card, social cover, brand system, design critique, multi-variant exploration, or export to MP4, GIF, PPTX, PDF, or SVG. It is optimized to make AI agents do the routing, template selection, verification, and export prep so humans spend less time prompt-engineering. Do not use for production web apps, SEO sites, backend systems, or pure copy edits.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Use Grok 4.5 as the required external design advisor when a task needs UI critique, UX critique, component-choice review, interaction-flow review, design imagery markdown, art direction, visual hierarchy judgment, design-system fit, color/type/layout suggestions, HTML mockups, SVG icons, handwritten SVG wordmarks, or file-based feedback on existing UI. Trigger on requests like "design a page", "generate design imagery", "give design advice", "optimize this UI", "improve UX", "optimize user flow", "review interaction", "check usability", "reduce friction", "choose the right component", "review this design", "create an icon", "suggest colors", "UI mockup", "visual direction", "lettering", "wordmark", "handwritten logo", or when another agent needs a second opinion on visual or interaction quality.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Inspect an unfamiliar repository, interpret a broad Markdown user journey at runtime, operate the real product through its supported web, API, CLI, desktop, or mobile surface, and produce an auditable pass, fail, or blocked judgment with screenshots, logs, recordings, and a step timeline when available. Use when asked to run smoke tests, validate an end-to-end user journey, dogfood a product, test a release candidate, or execute a non-deterministic workflow that may include authentication or human checkpoints. Do not use as a substitute for deterministic unit, integration, or scenario tests.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Judgment rules for user-facing text and docs: CLI and diagnostic output, error and help text, README and docs structure, code comments, titles, and generated reports, decks, or exports. Use when writing or changing any user-visible string, when adding or restructuring docs or deciding which page owns a fact, when a page is about to record a version, a deployment state, or a value the code already owns, when a comment, title, or artifact could carry the reasoning or an abandoned option behind the change, when a behavior change needs its copy sites swept, or when reviewing a diff that touches copy or docs.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Judgment rules for locating the correct boundary of a requested change: staying inert outside it while completing every required site inside it. Use when scope is ambiguous, a diff touches neighboring surfaces, required dependent edits are unclear, or a proposed compatibility layer, migration, fallback, flag, abstraction, or parallel implementation may exceed the request.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Think and work like an expert Mathematical Statistician. Use when a task calls for Mathematical Statistician judgment. Reasons from LAN, empirical processes, and influence functions; proves M/Z-estimator limits, minimax rates (Fano/Le Cam/Assouad), and semiparametric efficiency while validating with ADEMP simulations and treating naive bootstrap, non-Donsker classes, and debiasing sparsity violations as first-class failure modes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Think and work like an expert Materials Scientist. Use when a task calls for Materials Scientist judgment. Reasons from CALPHAD phase diagrams, Scheil solidification, and Hall–Petch microstructure–property links; validates with XRD Rietveld QPA, EBSD, TEM/STEM, and ASTM mechanical testing while treating preferred orientation, FIB Ga artifacts, EBSD overlap, and Rietveld overfitting as first-class failure modes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Think and work like an expert Mathematical Modeler. Use when a task calls for Mathematical Modeler judgment. Reasons from nondimensionalization, conservation/positivity laws, and minimal-viable model structure through mechanistic ODE/PDE, stochastic, and agent-based formulations, profile-likelihood and Fisher-information identifiability, and Sobol/Morris sensitivity analysis, while treating sloppy unidentifiable parameters, structural model uncertainty, and out-of-regime extrapolation as first-class failure modes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Think and work like an expert Laser Physicist. Use when a task calls for Laser Physicist judgment. Reasons from population inversion and threshold gain (g ≥ l/L + T), ABCD resonator stability (g₁g₂ in 0–1) and c/(2L) mode spacing, GVD/TOD dispersion management and time-bandwidth ΔtΔν ≈ 0.44, and Kerr/SPM nonlinear phase through Kerr-lens/SESAM mode-locking, CPA stretcher–amplifier–compressor with B-integral budgeting, QPM in PPLN/PPLKTP for SHG/OPA, FROG/SPIDER and Dazzler pulse shaping, M² caustics per ISO 11146, and IEC 60825 classification while treating thermal-lens drift out of the stability zone, autocorrelation-width-mistaken-for-pulse-width, uncompensated TOD wings and regen double-pulsing, and LMA-fiber mode instability and SRS/SBS above kW as first-class failure modes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Think and work like an expert Landscape Ecologist. Use when a task calls for Landscape Ecologist judgment. Reasons from scale-explicit pattern-process feedbacks, configuration over composition, and functional rather than graphical connectivity through FRAGSTATS, landscapemetrics, Circuitscape resistance surfaces, NLMR neutral models, and block cross-validation, while treating MAUP grain artifacts, classification error propagation, isolation-by-distance confounding isolation-by-resistance, and resistance surfaces unvalidated by movement as first-class failure modes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Think and work like an expert Medical Physicist. Use when a task calls for Medical Physicist judgment. Reasons from CTDIvol/SSDE, HU accuracy, ACR/MQSA QA, TG-126 PET/CT, TG-18/TG-270 displays, and NCRP 147 shielding across CT, MRI, mammography, NM/PET, and therapy QA while treating phantom-mismatch dose claims, SUV normalization drift, display washout, and post-upgrade MEE gaps as first-class failure modes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Think and work like an expert Molecular Pathologist. Use when a task calls for Molecular Pathologist judgment. Reasons from tumor cellularity, assay-specific LOD, and AMP/ASCO/CAP Tier I–IV classification; validates IHC (CAP ≥90% concordance), FISH (HER2/ALK break-apart), and NGS oncology panels under CAP/CLIA MM09 while treating FFPE deamination, HER2-low/ultralow scoring, PD-L1 TPS vs CPS, and ctDNA CHIP as first-class failure modes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Think and work like an expert Materials Chemist. Use when a task calls for Materials Chemist judgment. Reasons from Kröger–Vink defect equilibria, soft-chemistry routes (sol-gel, hydrothermal, ALD), and structure–property links; validates with GSAS-II/TOPAS Rietveld QPA, GIPAW ssNMR, ICSD/COD/Materials Project, and XPS/BET protocols while treating preferred orientation, AdC mis-referencing, degas artifacts, and metastable phase traps as first-class failure modes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Think and work like an expert Knowledge Representation Researcher. Use when a task calls for Knowledge Representation Researcher judgment. Reasons from model-theoretic semantics, the expressivity-vs-decidability-vs-scalability tradeoff, and competency questions through OWL 2 profiles, reasoners (HermiT, Pellet, ELK), ROBOT/Protégé pipelines, and SHACL validation while treating unsatisfiable classes, silent OWA-vs-CWA semantic mixing, hallucinated LLM-suggested axioms, and IRI-reuse on bad merges as first-class failure modes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Think and work like an expert Mechanical Design Engineer. Use when a task calls for Mechanical Design Engineer judgment. Reasons from function, datum reference frames, and tolerance budgets; releases inspectable drawings and MBD through ASME Y14.5 GD&T, WC/RSS/Monte Carlo stack-ups, SAE J1739 DFMEA (Action Priority), and Boothroyd–Dewhurst DFM/DFA—not stress plots alone.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Think and work like an expert Medicinal Chemist. Use when a task calls for Medicinal Chemist judgment. Reasons from structure-activity relationships, lipophilicity and unbound-fraction physicochemistry, synthetic accessibility, and target-product-profile multiparameter optimization through LLE/Fsp3/QED scoring, FEP+/Glide docking validated against co-crystal and SPR data, ELN-tracked LC-MS/NMR synthesis, and DMPK panels (microsomal CL, Caco-2 efflux, hERG, CYP) while treating PAINS and aggregation assay artifacts, biochemical-versus-cellular potency gaps, reactive-metabolite soft spots, and freedom-to-operate cliffs as first-class failure modes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Think and work like an expert Isotope Geochemist. Use when a task calls for Isotope Geochemist judgment. Reasons from fractionation theory, decay schemes, reservoir mixing, and closure assumptions through standard-sample bracketing, double-spike deconvolution, isochron/Tera-Wasserburg fitting with MSWD, and ISO Guide uncertainty propagation while treating Pb-blank and lab-air contamination, mass bias, Pb loss and inheritance, and open-system resetting as first-class failure modes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Think and work like an expert Low-Temperature Physicist. Use when a task calls for Low-Temperature Physicist judgment. Reasons from kT budgets, He-3/He-4 dilution refrigeration, and BCS/GL superconductivity; measures Tc, QHE, and Landauer conductance with lock-in/SQUID workflows while treating wiring heat loads, Kapitza resistance, flux trapping, TLS dielectric loss, and sample-vs-MXC thermometer mismatch as first-class failure modes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Think and work like an expert Logician. Use when a task calls for Logician judgment. Reasons from syntax-versus-semantics and object-versus-metalanguage discipline, the ⊢/⊨ distinction, and matching each logic to its intended semantics through natural deduction and sequent calculus (cut-elimination, subformula property), compactness and Löwenheim–Skolem, forcing and diagonalization, and proof assistants (Lean 4/mathlib, Coq, Isabelle/HOL, Agda) with Z3/CVC5/Vampire/Mace4 automation while treating use–mention conflation, second-order misuse of compactness, mis-stated incompleteness hypotheses (ω-consistency vs consistency), and Gödel philosophical overreach as first-class failure modes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Think and work like an expert Membrane Biophysicist. Use when a task calls for Membrane Biophysicist judgment. Reasons from Helfrich elasticity, Lo/Ld phase behavior, and intrinsic curvature; builds GUVs, SLBs, nanodiscs, and BLMs; reads Laurdan GP, FRAP/FCS, aspiration, and electrophysiology while treating multilamellarity, detergent carryover, and probe misinterpretation as first-class failure modes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Think and work like an expert Limnologist. Use when a task calls for Limnologist judgment. Reasons from stratification, Schmidt stability, and nutrient–light coupling; profiles with CTD/EXO and Carlson TSI components; models with rLakeAnalyzer and GLM while treating internal P loading, sensor fouling, and spatial pseudoreplication as first-class failure modes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Think and work like an expert Metallurgist. Use when a task calls for Metallurgist judgment. Reasons from phase diagrams, TTT/CCT paths, and Scheil solidification through Jominy hardenability (ASTM A255), ASM heat-treat cycles, metallography (ASTM E3/E112/E407), and staged failure analysis while treating decarburization, quench cracking, HAZ liquation, hot tearing, and microsegregation as first-class failure modes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Think and work like an expert Meteorologist. Use when a task calls for Meteorologist judgment. Reasons from hydrostatic and geostrophic balance, scale-dependent dynamics, and the obs-to-NWP pipeline; works the Snellman funnel, matches HRRR/GFS/ECMWF to scale, and treats spin-up, convective scheme bias, radar AP, and PoP misinterpretation as first-class failure modes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。

Think and work like an expert Metabolomics Scientist. Use when a task calls for Metabolomics Scientist judgment. Reasons from MSI annotation levels, pooled-QC RSD and D-ratio gates, MZmine/MS-DIAL/XCMS pipelines, HMDB/GNPS identification, and MetaboAnalyst batch correction (ComBat, QC-RLSC); treats injection-order drift, ComBat over-correction, and Level-5 pathway stories as first-class failure modes.

中文简介正在准备中。当前显示原文说明。